Jump to content

Control and Cliff Lee and Daniel Cabrera?


Leitch

Recommended Posts

An article in Baseball Prospectus today by Eric Seidman about the pitchers over history who have improved their control by a significant amount and actually maintained their newfound control had some interesting nuggets in it.

It's part of a series of articles regarding Cliff Lee's 2008 season and how it happened:

While revisiting the 2008 dominance of Cliff Lee last week, we investigated how pitchers with similarly large spikes in ground-ball rates have fared in subsequent seasons. The results weren't pretty, and showed that massive rate increases in this area have been few and far between since 1954, and a very low percentage of these pitchers have been able to sustain these higher rates.

Last week was about GB%, this week was about Lee's huge gains in control. Good stuff overall, but check this out:

Between 1954 and 2008, only 10 pitchers have reduced their walk rate and increased their ground-ball rate to such an extent in the same season.
Player             Years   GB1  GB2  UBB1  UBB2Ray Lamb          1971-72  .49  .61  3.52  2.01Mike Norris       1979-80  .48  .56  5.23  2.56John Denny        1982-83  .66  .74  4.48  1.78Al Leiter         1997-98  .40  .49  5.17  3.22Dwight Gooden     1999-00  .35  .47  5.01  3.51Steve Sparks      1999-00  .43  .52  5.00  2.51Kevin Appier      2000-01  .43  .52  4.24  2.61[b][i][u]Daniel Cabrera    2006-07  .41  .49  6.26  4.49[/u][/i][/b]Cliff Lee         2007-08  .36  .45  3.24  1.33Carlos Villanueva 2007-08  .37  .48  3.94  2.41
Only Daniel Cabrera and John Denny fell within the +0.30 maximum UBB/9 increase, and only Cabrera and Steve Sparks produced similar ground-ball rates. Cabrera is the only other qualifying pitcher we have on record who had these changes and sustained them in consecutive years.

While we spent years getting on Cabrera for his lack of control and this and that and the pitchforks really started coming out after last season, I don't think many acknowledged or even realized what exactly Cabrera accomplished.

Obviously, it wasn't enough, as his stuff, strikeouts, power allowed and hits allowed went so far backward that his gains in control and GB% couldn't cover, but nonetheless I found this interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL. The only reason D'Cab is on that list is because he was such a horrible pitcher to begin with... he set the bar sooo unbelievably low that up was the only way he could go... getting positively recognized for a 4.49 BB/9....smart man...

:rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes sense to me because he started throwing less hard with a 2 seamer rather than a 4 seamer. So since he threw softer he had better control and since it was a 2 seamer, it sunk meaning that the hitters would then hit the ball on the ground......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I always thought that if you weren't around 10:1 you weren't trying hard enough.
    • Adley was a nearly finished product when picked, if not for tradition and service time stuff he could have been in the majors shortly after he left college. Gunnar needed 1000+ minor league plate appearances as a high school pick. Ask this same question about the 1990-2017 Orioles with their development system. They certainly could have found a way to screw up Gunnar, would have been harder with Adley.
    • I don’t think it was weird at all.  EDC said it but I thought it unfolded as expected.  You knew the QBs would go. You knew tons of OT and WR would go.   This was always going to be an offense dominated first round. The Oline and WR depth is in every round. I suspect that they go Oline twice or Oline/WR tonight.  Obviously you never know how the board falls but I think that’s what is likely.   This is mainly going to be an offense draft. EDC said a few weeks ago that they will draft a RB.  My guess is that the RB goes sometime in day 3. They will come out of this draft with at least 2 more Olineman, one WR and one RB.  I suspect they take a safety at some point as well. The question will be do they take 9 players.  The Ravens didn’t feel this was a draft with as many draftable players as years past, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they make some kind of a trade. 
    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...