Jump to content

Orioles Interested In Ryan Shealy


Boca Bird

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 415
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I must be missing something here. If Shealy is a DH-type and not a good 1B, then why do we need him? If we trade Javy for him we not much better at DH, if at all, and then we need a good backup catcher. If we trade someone else we seem to have an excess of DHs.

IMO, if we are going to trade Javy, we need a 1B or a LF, with Markakis playing RF and Gibby DHing. In the long run, Gibby is likely a better DH than Shealy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Shealy rumor is pretty hot. The Rockies like Javy Lopez, but don't know if that's a one-for-one they are talking about.

Posted by: Roch Kubatko | June 23, 2006 at 12:17 PM

Link: http://blogs.baltimoresun.com/sports_custom_roch/2006/06/taking_deep_bre.html#comments

Interesting, I wonder why it is hot?

Is it because of message boards like this? The paper? Or some rumblings from the warehouse?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be pretty upset if we deal Olsen for Shealy. We may have young arms but none of them are proven yet, Olsen's only been in the system for a year and should be able to move up fairly quickly.

The Rockies have their hands tied with Shealy. If they want prospects give them Johnson and another Finch-type.

Johnson, Finch-type and Hawkins...

Lopez and Finch-type or Johnson...

But don't give up a bargaining chip for a blocked product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must be missing something here. If Shealy is a DH-type and not a good 1B, then why do we need him? If we trade Javy for him we not much better at DH, if at all, and then we need a good backup catcher. If we trade someone else we seem to have an excess of DHs.

IMO, if we are going to trade Javy, we need a 1B or a LF, with Markakis playing RF and Gibby DHing. In the long run, Gibby is likely a better DH than Shealy.

I think you actually raise an interesting point.

Shealy is young enough and talented enough that he is worth getting even if it creates a log jam...

However, a problem of roster flexibility and defense again comes up...

My question becomes: Does the acquisition of Shealy mean that we should be looking to move Gibbons as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be pretty upset if we deal Olsen for Shealy. We may have young arms but none of them are proven yet, Olsen's only been in the system for a year and should be able to move up fairly quickly.

The Rockies have their hands tied with Shealy. If they want prospects give them Johnson and another Finch-type.

Johnson, Finch-type and Hawkins...

Lopez and Finch-type or Johnson...

But don't give up a bargaining chip for a blocked product.

One could say Olsen is a blocked product also...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be pretty upset if we deal Olsen for Shealy. We may have young arms but none of them are proven yet, Olsen's only been in the system for a year and should be able to move up fairly quickly.

The Rockies have their hands tied with Shealy. If they want prospects give them Johnson and another Finch-type.

Johnson, Finch-type and Hawkins...

Lopez and Finch-type or Johnson...

But don't give up a bargaining chip for a blocked product.

The Orioles won't be the only team interested in Shealy, that's for sure. Sometimes we all forget this fact. The Rockies won't have any problem moving Shealy as he will be cheap for a while now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I think it’s pretty natural for kids to take special notice of the guys with speed who make exciting plays like steals and triples and defensive “web gems.” Seems like the kids now are higher on guys like Mateo and Mullins than the grownups, and I think that was the case with Brian Roberts back in the day too. As for clutch, in going through some of the clutch numbers, one guy who stood out as a possible fit for us is Alex Bregman. He has a career 144 wRC+ with runners on base and a .294 BA with RISP — I tend to care a little more about BA when a hit scores a run. His postseason heroics are also pretty well-known. Not sure what you’d have to pay him, and I’m pretty sure signing him would necessitate the Holliday-to-CF move. But if they’re not willing to play in the Soto sandbox financially, Bregman would be a veteran guy with championship pedigree and (importantly) ties to Mike/Sig that could put him near the top of their list. 
    • Just to be as clear as possible, when they were doing better early in the season, they were swinging more, not less. 4/1 - 6/30: 7.2 BB%, 49.3% swing rate, 29.8% out of zone swing rate, 22.2% whiff rate, .316 OBP 7/1 - 9/30: 8.7 BB%, 47.8% swing rate, 29.0% out of zone swing rate, 22.4% whiff rate, .315 OBP 2023: 8.4 BB%, 47.8% swing rate, 29.9% out of zone swing rate, 23.0% whiff rate, .321 OBP They took less walks early in the year, they swung more often at both balls and strikes early in the year, and their OBP/whiff rates were essentially identical in both halves.  The notion that they turned into free-swinging hackers in the second half — and that’s why they failed — seems to be pretty commonly held here, but it’s not backed by any data. They were actually more patient at the plate in this season’s second half than they’ve ever been during the Adley era.
    • Meant to say I wouldn't mind him managing the Orioles. I always liked him as a manager. 
    • It is a foolish hope to expect a full season out of Rodriguez. Kremer is fine, and I’m glad to have him. Suarez was better in most meaningful stats, but we don’t know what Suarez is going to do. He could possibly be just a flash in the pan. Povich is trade or depth. We need depth. Our 2025 -ready pitchers all have potential problems. but now we also need outfielders and infielders
    • A very good move as long as he is healthy. Surprised he wanted to come back. I would had mind here. A HOF manager
    • I think we sign one pitcher who is pretty much guaranteed a starting spot, hopefully a strong #1/#2 type, and then sign a couple guys to complete with Povich, Suarez (not sure his contract status) and Rogers for the #5 spot behind Eflin, signee, Grayson and Kremer.   With Grayson's injury history, I hope we get a decent arm or two that we can either stash in AAA or in the bullpen who can start when injuries inevitably happen.  Povich will be in that mix, but performance will hopefully determine who get is.  I'm encourages by his end of the year results, but certainly don't expect big things from him next year.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...