Jump to content

What should a statue of Brooks look like?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Well, you and your pal Mackus need to learn what the word "respect" means. Apparently it is missing from your vocabulary (or brains) when it comes to Brooks Robinson.:eek::(:rolleyestf:

You might want to learn the word "fun"... as it appears to be missing from your vocabulary :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply
This is what his statue looks like out front on 5 Brooks Robinson's Way at Sovereign Bank in York,PA.

http://www.yorkrevolution.com/brooksrobinson.cfm

Sorry, it's not a very good pic, but it shows Brook's in the middle with a young girl to the left and young boy to the right on him. He's signing an autograph for them.

Another pic of him standing along of the statue further down the page.

I never knew, until looking at this statue, that Brooks writes left-handed. Upon review, the Norman Rockwell painting also shows him signing left-handed.

It seems very unusual to find someone who writes left-handed but throws right-handed. My gosh, what if he had learned to throw left-handed as a kid, he never would have been a third baseman!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those on here that actually have 1/2 a brain...

If we give Brooks a statue, Cal Ripken almost has to have one, he's the most recognizable name associated with the Orioles and their history. He also was responsible for 2131, which was voted the #1 moment in baseball history, so yea, I'd give one to him before anyone else (and I'd probably prefer to just have one for him). I also think Frank Robinson, while not an Oriole for as long, deserves one too (and, yes, I think FRobby was a better overall player than Brooks, sue me).

As for Mackus' post about Robocop. It made me laugh. It's funny. A sense of humor is a good thing, trust me.

Fortunately, 99.9% of the people on this site know this.

:rolleyes:

I am glad to know you have surveyed at least 99.9% of the people on this site. How long did that task take you? I bet you would fail a lie detector if you answered that question. What a joke. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never knew, until looking at this statue, that Brooks writes left-handed. Upon review, the Norman Rockwell painting also shows him signing left-handed.

It seems very unusual to find someone who writes left-handed but throws right-handed. My gosh, what if he had learned to throw left-handed as a kid, he never would have been a third baseman!

My father wrote right handed, threw left-handed, batted left-handed, golfed right-handed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never knew, until looking at this statue, that Brooks writes left-handed. Upon review, the Norman Rockwell painting also shows him signing left-handed.

It seems very unusual to find someone who writes left-handed but throws right-handed. My gosh, what if he had learned to throw left-handed as a kid, he never would have been a third baseman!

I knew this. Brooks I believe had to learn to play that way as he couldn't get a left handed glove when he was a kid as I recall.

I actually started trying to play baseball as a righty but kept taking the glove off of my left hand to throw the ball (up against a wall) and finally my dad saw that I was left handed. As a toddler my mother kept forcing me to eat with my right hand and also that is how I learned how to write (with my right hand). To this day the only things I do right handed are eat (use silverware) and write. Everything else I do as a natural left hander.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My father wrote right handed, threw left-handed, batted left-handed, golfed right-handed.

There are plenty of guys who bat left and throw/write right, but I think that throwing with one hand and writing with the other is much more rare. As to your dad, well that's pretty freaky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those on here that actually have 1/2 a brain...

If we give Brooks a statue, Cal Ripken almost has to have one, he's the most recognizable name associated with the Orioles and their history. He also was responsible for 2131, which was voted the #1 moment in baseball history, so yea, I'd give one to him before anyone else (and I'd probably prefer to just have one for him). I also think Frank Robinson, while not an Oriole for as long, deserves one too (and, yes, I think FRobby was a better overall player than Brooks, sue me).

As for Mackus' post about Robocop. It made me laugh. It's funny. A sense of humor is a good thing, trust me.

Fortunately, 99.9% of the people on this site know this.

:rolleyes:

I am glad to know you have surveyed at least 99.9% of the people on this site. How long did that task take you? I bet you would fail a lie detector if you answered that question. What a joke. :(

Well of course I wasn't being literal you silly goose!:laughlol:
Then don't make false statements. That is called lying, misleading, or fabricating.
Yes if you lack the cognitive ability to differentiate between stone-cold truth and obvious hyperbole...which you apparently do not. Which, frankly, does not surprise me.

Just go away.

Ok, this is getting silly, and the kind of exchange I just hate.

Let's get back to Pedro Cerrano's substantive point. How would you distinguish who gets a statue and who doesn't? The O's obviously decided that you couldn't really start choosing among the five people who have gone into the Hall of Fame wearing an Orioles hat, so they went with the giant numbers instead of five statues. That seems logical enough to me. I mean, you could make arguments why one of these guys deserves it more than the others, but frankly it would be a divisive issue. If you put it to a vote of all Oriole fans, I doubt you'd get a majority voting for any one of the five.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<img src=http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/business/consuminginterests/blog/testudo.jpg></img> .

That would also be a fitting statue for Andy MacPhail... :D

Anyway the statue for Brooks should be this IMO:

<img src=http://www.spawn.com/toys/baseball/cooperstown/brobinson/images/cooperstown_brobinson_photo_01_dl.jpg></img>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, this is getting silly, and the kind of exchange I just hate.

Let's get back to Pedro Cerrano's substantive point. How would you distinguish who gets a statue and who doesn't? The O's obviously decided that you couldn't really start choosing among the five people who have gone into the Hall of Fame wearing an Orioles hat, so they went with the giant numbers instead of five statues. That seems logical enough to me. I mean, you could make arguments why one of these guys deserves it more than the others, but frankly it would be a divisive issue. If you put it to a vote of all Oriole fans, I doubt you'd get a majority voting for any one of the five.

I like the idea of an infield with statues of all the Orioles retired numbers

-Frank Robinson at the plate

-Cal at SS

-Murray at 1B,

-Brooks Robinson at 3B

-Palmer on the mound

-Earl walking out to the mound

Should be enough room to put Wieters behind the plate as well... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Statues are for communists, Nazis, the 19th century, and crappy baseball teams like the Pirates and Nationals (oh wait, :scratchchinhmm:).

The only statute I want outside OPACY is this:

muhammad-ali.jpg

With Matt Wieters's face on Ali's body and Chuck Norris as Sonny Liston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have something like 10 statues(including Ernie Harwell) in Detroit..who says the Orioles cant have a statue park as you walk into the plaza?

Id have one for Brooks, then Cal, then Earl, then Frank, then Palmer, then Eddie...it would be beautiful?

Oh I forgot..the Orioles have that perpetutal "spending freeze".

They do have one.

EDIT: To bring full-circle the thread: What a Brooks Robinson statue at Oriole Park looks like.

<img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/51/177967651_41be573424.jpg"></img>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • The lack of power of Beavers is a concern.  It’s a bit of a concern with Holliday too. 
    • Mullins does outperform his expected numbers quite frequently and while he's in one of his patented slumps, his "run values" as a player makes him right about average, mainly because his defense at a valued position up the middle is so good. The Orioles don't have one single player in Double-A of higher who can play plus defensive center field besides Mullins. that's going to give him a long leash on his offensive struggles. Most players are streaky. Some fans seem to only have a 3-4 week tolerance for players who struggle before they start to get antsy and call for the player to get less playing time or to bring up the "prospect of choice" to replace them. Mullins is still a valuable player on a contending team because of his defense in CF. He's going to get on a hot streak with the bat at some point and he settle back into the .710 OPS player that he probably is at this point in his career with the bat. Not every batter 1-9 is going to be an average major league hitter or better, but until the Orioles find an outstanding defensive CFer to replace him, he's going to get a very long leash this year.
    • Besides the guy who said he prayed everyday that McKenna is off the team, perhaps you can point us to the "amount of bile directed at McKenna?" I see most people discussing his merits, whether he will be taken or not, or whether he might be better off in the KBO. Unless you believe saying that you hope he's claimed is "ridiculous amounts of bile" or "vilifying him." This seems to be a JLC-level over reaction and an over simplification of the actual comments made in this thread IMHO.
    • O'Hearn in right.  It's the Buck All Stars.
    • Last year Peacock had a Sunday morning package from May through Early September, with all the games at 11:30 AM or noon ET.   And they were exclusive to Peacock paying customers and  blacked out on MLB app no matter where you were, like the Friday Apple games. This year Roku is taking over that package.   Some differences: Roku is free.  (Though you do have to use an app on your TV or smart device to watch it). The games will NOT be blacked out on MLB TV. A few of the games will not be so early. One similarity is that I believe the games won't be on MASN, only Roku with their own announcers.   If you have MLB TV you can watch them; if you don't and normally watch MASN, you'll have to watch via the Roku app. Anyway, the Orioles are in a couple of the games, with the gametimes moving to earlier on those Sundays: May 19, Red Sox @ Cardinals, 1:05pm May 26, Blue Jays @ Tigers, 11:35am June 2, Twins @ Astros, 1:05pm June 9, Giants @ Rangers, 1:05pm June 16, Cardinals @ Cubs, 1:05pm June 23, Diamondbacks @ Phillies, 11:35am June 30, Pirates @ Braves, 11:35am July 7, Diamondbacks @ Padres, 4:10pm July 14, Yankees @ Orioles, 11:35am July 21, Brewers @ Twins, 1:05pm July 28, Reds @ Rays, 11:35am August 4, Giants @ Reds, 12:05pm August 11, Angels @ Nationals, 11:35am August 18, Marlins @ Mets, 12:05pm August 25, Nationals @ Braves, 12:05pm September 1, Dodgers @ Diamondbacks, 4:10pm September 8, Rays @ Orioles, 12:05pm September 15, Reds @ Twins, 1:05pm
    • I’d say Mateo has been playing well compared to expectations for him.  You can say his SLG is “inflated,” but it is what it is.  And his defense has been way better than “fine” of late.  He’s playing a stellar 2B.  He’s our best defensive 2B and it isn’t close.  Going into tonight’s game he’d been worth 0.7 rWAR, 0.5 fWAR in 25 games.  Hard to argue that’s not playing well.  
    • I didn't think this would be a possibility at the beginning of the season, but Elias might very well end up shopping for a veteran outfielder that can hit. Mullins and Hays have struggling at the plate since July 2023. Cowser has fallen off a cliff after his red hot start and hasn't adjusted yet to pitchers throwing him more breaking pitches. While the Orioles have young prospects who have promise. You can't expect them to step up this year to be a major reason this team makes a deep playoff run. Maybe Cowser or Kjerstad answers the call, but I think this team would benefit from an established veteran if Mullins/Hays continue to not hit.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...