Jump to content

What should a statue of Brooks look like?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm with the crowd that thinks the #'s are more than acceptable...and that by deciding to do a statue you create a slippery slope on who gets one, and who doesn't.

Plus the #'s kind of make OPACY different...and I like that.

The Orioles may not have done the best job in honoring the past at every occasion...but for someone who attends an Orioles game, and knows nothing about the history of the organization, you walk away with quite a lot of info to seep into your brain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would you distinguish who gets a statue and who doesn't? The O's obviously decided that you couldn't really start choosing among the five people who have gone into the Hall of Fame wearing an Orioles hat, so they went with the giant numbers instead of five statues. That seems logical enough to me. I mean, you could make arguments why one of these guys deserves it more than the others, but frankly it would be a divisive issue. If you put it to a vote of all Oriole fans, I doubt you'd get a majority voting for any one of the five.
You give it to Brooks because he wore the uniform as a player longer than anyone. He was the start of it all, winning MVP and gold gloves before the others arrived here.

All this talk about divisiveness. Please.

Where are the statues to Raymond Berry, Art Donovan, Gino Marchetti, or Lenny Moore outside M&T bank stadium.

One statue. Unitas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are plenty of guys who bat left and throw/write right, but I think that throwing with one hand and writing with the other is much more rare. As to your dad, well that's pretty freaky.

Both my (adopted) son and I throw right and write left. I batted left and so does he; although his coach started trying to switch him to right for better contact.

Our only difference is that he's also left footed.

I could tell Brooks wrote lefty the first time I saw his signature somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You give it to Brooks because he wore the uniform as a player longer than anyone. He was the start of it all, winning MVP and gold gloves before the others arrived here.

All this talk about divisiveness. Please.

Where are the statues to Raymond Berry, Art Donovan, Gino Marchetti, or Lenny Moore outside M&T bank stadium.

One statue. Unitas.

But when I think of the Orioles...Brooks isn't the 1st player to come to mind. Granted I wasn't alive when he was playing...and I was when Cal was....

but Cal personifies this city, and this organization...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But when I think of the Orioles...Brooks isn't the 1st player to come to mind. Granted I wasn't alive when he was playing...and I was when Cal was....

but Cal personifies this city, and this organization...

Nah, Soprano is exactly right...

It's not about you. Just like it's not about somebody younger than you who would say "But I don't remember Cal, for me it's BRob".

It's about the history of this modern baseball in Baltimore...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cal is from this area.

Cal still lives in this area.

Cal owns one of the Orioles MiL affiliates.

Cal was better at what he did than Brooks was at what he did.

This is nothing against Brooks, as I probably have been around him way more than anyone on this site other than Roy...He was a great player on great teams but he just wasn't as accomplished as Ripken was and he doesn't have the local ties.

I still feel the statue should be Palmer, Brooks and Cal....Oh and btw, why is it automatically Brooks over Palmer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither do I, and I don't know your age but say you are 40, would you respect a 10 year old telling you that you "know nothing about anything and are stupid'?:scratchchinhmm::eek::( That would be the equivilent of what was going on here.

Someone who wasn't even born until Brooks had long retired, while I was around watching Brooks daily playing baseball from 1963 through his entire career, telling me I know nothing about the man (or anything else for that matter). Tell me that wouldn't tick you off at least a little bit?

OldFan, you seriously need to stop. You're out of control in this thread. I'm trying to figure out how this dispute began, and it appears that you came into this thread with guns blazing, looking for a fight, and succeeded in creating one over completely innocuous comments/jokes. Nobody was denigrating Brooks, nobody is questioning your knowledge of Brooks, and yet you're devolving into an inexplicable "Respect your elders! Kids today!" rant that has nothing to do with anything.

Please stop trying to ruin a thread that's meant to be a tribute to one of the Orioles' all-time greats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OldFan, you seriously need to stop. You're out of control in this thread. I'm trying to figure out how this dispute began, and it appears that you came into this thread with guns blazing, looking for a fight, and succeeded in creating one over completely innocuous comments/jokes. Nobody was denigrating Brooks, nobody is questioning your knowledge of Brooks, and yet you're devolving into an inexplicable "Respect your elders! Kids today!" rant that has nothing to do with anything.

Please stop trying to ruin a thread that's meant to be a tribute to one of the Orioles' all-time greats.

Rep City...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cal is from this area.

Cal still lives in this area.

Cal owns one of the Orioles MiL affiliates.

Cal was better at what he did than Brooks was at what he did.

This is nothing against Brooks, as I probably have been around him way more than anyone on this site other than Roy...He was a great player on great teams but he just wasn't as accomplished as Ripken was and he doesn't have the local ties.

I still feel the statue should be Palmer, Brooks and Cal....Oh and btw, why is it automatically Brooks over Palmer?

Not everything is a number.

You remember Cal, you don't remember Brooks. That's what it comes down to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cal is from this area.

Cal still lives in this area.

Cal owns one of the Orioles MiL affiliates.

Cal was better at what he did than Brooks was at what he did.

This is nothing against Brooks, as I probably have been around him way more than anyone on this site other than Roy...He was a great player on great teams but he just wasn't as accomplished as Ripken was and he doesn't have the local ties.

I still feel the statue should be Palmer, Brooks and Cal....Oh and btw, why is it automatically Brooks over Palmer?

This is a good point, but at the same time it's hard for you or I, or anyone else who wasn't around when Brooks played, to say who is more important to the franchise. I don't think there is a right or wrong answer. That's why I would say we don't need a statue of anyone. I like the numbers, but would like to see them look a little nicer, with maybe a write up beside them of why they are honored.

Also, I like JTrea's suggestion of the infield, but that seems like it would be too big to actually put anywhere around OPACY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a good point, but at the same time it's hard for you or I, or anyone else who wasn't around when Brooks played, to say who is more important to the franchise. I don't think there is a right or wrong answer. That's why I would say we don't need a statue of anyone. I like the numbers, but would like to see them look a little nicer, with maybe a write up beside them of why they are honored.

Also, I like JTrea's suggestion of the infield, but that seems like it would be too big to actually put anywhere around OPACY.

I like the numbers as well, and would like new numbers statues. I think they are cooler than a statue of the actual person would be. I'd like to see them in bronze though, or whatever the Ruth statue is made out of, and look at bit more artistic rather than just block numbers in stainless steel.

If they do statues, I think it might be kinda cool to have them in the bullpen picnic area. I agree if they do the statues, that they should do a statue for everyone who's number is out front, not just for Brooks. Brooks was great, but I don't think he deserves any more recognition than any of the other guys out there. They are all Orioles legends, and should be honored as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not everything is a number.

You remember Cal, you don't remember Brooks. That's what it comes down to.

Please don't try to tell me what I do and do not know...you have no business trying to figure anything out in my mind.

I fully understand the impact of Brooks as a player and a person..Just because I didn't watch him doesn't mean I don't understand that so please, take your nostalgia bs and go elsewhere.

There is no disputing what i said.

The best argument for Brooks is that he won more but let's face it, he played on better teams and in a different era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Why? In 9 starts he’s only given up 3 ERs twice.  He’s been darn good.   Seems pretty easy to imagine him mowing down just about anyone he faces.   
    • I think getting a hard throwing reliever is going to be a top priority for Elias at the trade deadline. The bullpen has done well, but it's missing a guy you can bring in who can overpower hitters. During the playoffs in a tight spot with runners on 2B and 3B it would be good to have an option like the team had in Bautista last year.
    • I agree. They baby all the pitchers now.
    • Gunnar is OPSing .113 points higher v. LHP than RHP this year.  He’s one of the best hitters in the game, a potential MVP and will be rightfully batting lead-off everyday he plays this year.  
    • I'd like to see Westburg lead off vs. LHers, Gunnar vs. RHers.
    • 49 runs last 13 games. Bound to happen. 3.77 rpg. That said club has gone 9-4.    I will say you can see some things taking shape as we go along.    -Holliday would fit perfect on the club. Mateo is hitting well vs LHP. He was solid last year. Can play Holliday here and there vs LHP but would make sense to platoon them. No I’m not advocating they rush him back now but you can limit his exposure as long as Mateo keeps playing well. Hopefully another month to 6 weeks he is ready to go.    - O’Hearn keeps hitting. Makes sense to start McCann mainly vs LHP. That way when Adley doesn’t start it’s vs LHP and he can DH. If you DH Adley vs a RHP that means O’Hearn has to play OF which lessens his value.    -Cowser is struggling some but not to the extent some are saying. That said Hays is going to play and not that he is a big splits guy but it makes sense to sit Cowser some vs LHP.    - I still think Mayo makes sense as a late season call up mainly to DH vs LHP. Adley will be catching most of the big games late in year and obviously in playoffs. If the club is fortunate to have big lead in September than the kid can get even more at bats. I can see a scenario where vs a LHP in playoffs he is in the starting lineup at DH.  - Issue with Mullins is who plays CF in his place? We have nobody. Sure you can play Hays or Cowser there here and and there but not regular. He is a proven player and if rest of lineup does what they are capable of can afford to give him some time. Would not shock me to see Elias acquire a Michael Taylor type at deadline.  I like our lineup but we haven’t been walking much. Kinda odd. Not like it hasn’t worked but something to follow. Overall I’m not worried. Part of sport. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...