Jump to content

Interesting Hobgood article


SrMeowMeow

Recommended Posts

Saying it has been two seasons is severely mistaking the facts. Hobgood only made 8 starts for 26.2 innings in 2009. He only has 116 innings in his whole career with an approximate 4.68 ERA.

To call that a bust is just wrong.

Maybe I am wrong but really not what you want to see out of your high first round draft pick. Seems most people were correct and he was way way overdrafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I saw an article recently suggesting that this was an issue for most minor-league clubs. The players, due to low salaries and per-diems, are essentially forced to subsist on fast- and junk-food.

Drungo often mentions that a salary cap would simply allow a club like the Yankees to throw unlimited resources into their minor-league clubs. I wonder why there isn't a team out there trying to do that now?

Hobgood was paid a $2,500,000 signing bonus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. Besides there's a big difference between not eating right and overeating. I'm sure most minor leaguers don't eat right and look to be in top shape. That's not the same as just eating way too much.

If the article is correct, it sounds like Hobgood gained 30 or more pounds from last October (after the season) to March (spring training). If that is true, then the O's should have roasted the pounds off of him. I posted an article last spring about Hobgood getting in better shape, working with a trainer at the end of the offseason, etc., and there was no mention of him weighing 270 lbs when he came to spring training. I haven't seen that info anywhere. Either he and the O's really downplayed this in the spring or the article is mistaken. If true, then it's pretty disgusting. If not true, then the high school kid who wrote the article is way off base. Crap, my doctor just chewed my butt out for gaining four pounds in the last year. I imagine the Orioles went nuts if he really gained 30 pounds in the offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do people constantly want to give this guy excuses?

- he is big boned

- his genes has caused him to be big

- his weight gain came with added muscle

- he is working on other pitches so he can succeed is why his numbers are down

- maybe it is the O's front office for not providing a nutrisinst

etc...

What's next, he has a good personality?

He is a man and a professional plan and simple! He isn't a poor 20 year old junior hanging out in a frat house on some college campus. He didn't have a choice where he was picked, but for a person that suppose to have "off the charts makeup", I am clearly disappointed. I really want the guy to come into spring training and prove us all wrong.

Can we repeat Tony's mantra "Actions speak louder than words"!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A scout reported to Tony that he sat 92-94 one game this season. That would be awesome if he could be there next season consistently.

When FB velocity varies from game to game by three to five MPH, it's usually a sign of severe mechanical inconsistency. We get used to the idea of MLB pitchers hitting the same velocity game after game. They might lose a little bit as the season goes on, but if a big league pitcher sits at 91-93 with his four-seamer today, you can usually count on it being around 91-93 next time out.

But in the lower minors there is often a lot more variation, because frequently younger pitchers don't yet have their mechanics locked down.

This isn't to knock Hobgood, nor to make excuses,. It's just the way it is. I have no doubt that Hobgood is sitting on a 94 MPH fastball when everything is going right. But I am also sure that he and the coaches had some frustrating days this summer when his mechanics were all over the place. His future as a high-level pro player probably depends on him being able to work that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...