Jump to content

Orioles attendance so far -- not encouraging


Frobby

Recommended Posts

So let me get this straight, you haven't worked there since 2003, you have no idea what the exact percentage is, and you're saying I'm completely off when I gave you a percentage the year AFTER you stopped working there? Good grief. You come off high and mighty, bash someone for being COMPLETELY off, yet you:

1. Don't have the data

2. Haven't worked there in nearly 8 years

3. Are claiming 85%, when at the very least *1* year was around 60%

And you're still ignoring small sample sizes in regards to my data about the weather. The economy plays a huge part (why is attendance down across baseball, skip?). Hell, you just pointed out a point that actually counterfeits your "losing" idea, because if that one Red Sox game is well attended, it drives the sales up quite a bit. Hell, why are you ignoring the weather altogether? I'm going to post again, because you're doing your same spiel (ignore the points that you can't counterargue):

owever, what you ignore (and HAVE been ignoring) is that there are short term factors in play.

If in 5 home games, the weather was terrible for 2 of them, would the average attendance be accurate against the entire year? I'm curious if you'd even answer this. There have been 23 games, at the point of this thread we've had the following games:

3 against the Tigers

3 against the Rangers

4 against the Twins

3 against the Yankees

1? against the BoSox

For a total of: 14 games. That is 17% of the home games of the season. Not exactly the end all determinant. And even better:

1 of the Yankees games were postponed

1 of the Rangers games were postponed and made up the following game during a double header

1 of the Yankees games had crappy weather the entire day

2 other games had poor weather

That's a total of 5 of the 14 home games with bad weather, or 35% of the home games.

Weather plays a part in short term statistical data. It's just the way it works, because large variances in attendance can affect the average. It's not hard to understand. THEN, you throw in the following:

1. The Red Sox poor start. When the Red Sox are not playing well, their fans do not come out. Period. Look at the average attendance at Red Sox games that correspond to their losing (traveling, obviously not at home).

2. Economy. Ticket sales are down across ALL of MLB. There are only 9 teams out of 30 (see: 30%) that actually have attendance that is up. Hell, one of the teams that have attendance that is down is the Yankees.

3. Weather as said above (short term, can't use it once the year is over)

4. Losing

Anyways, thanks for at least posting that you haven't worked there in 8 years and you have no idea what the percentage is. I appreciate that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
So let me get this straight, you haven't worked there since 2003, you have no idea what the exact percentage is, and you're saying I'm completely off when I gave you a percentage the year AFTER you stopped working there? Good grief. You come off high and mighty, bash someone for being COMPLETELY off, yet you:

1. Don't have the data

2. Haven't worked there in nearly 8 years

3. Are claiming 85%, when at the very least *1* year was around 60%

And you're still ignoring small sample sizes in regards to my data about the weather. The economy plays a huge part (why is attendance down across baseball, skip?). Hell, you just pointed out a point that actually counterfeits your "losing" idea, because if that one Red Sox game is well attended, it drives the sales up quite a bit. Hell, why are you ignoring the weather altogether? I'm going to post again, because you're doing your same spiel (ignore the points that you can't counterargue):

Anyways, thanks for at least posting that you haven't worked there in 8 years and you have no idea what the percentage is. I appreciate that.

I don't need to know the exact percentage to know exactly how things work.

As for not being there for 8 years...As I said, they have done more and more of the in season packages, which could effect the numbers..I am not sure.

However, I have sold several engagement rings to people who work down there or have recently left down there...I have talked to them, many times, about ticket sales, etc....same stuff always said.

I know you struggle with common sense but common sense tells the person of even average intelligence that a huge majority of tickets are sold preseason...in most years.

You provided an example where the % was much less...That's good. It shows that it can happen.

But treating an exception as a rule is foolish.

Season tickets will ALWAYS be the lifeblood of the organization in terms of ticket sales...that is the case for every team, in every sport.

That is where a huge majority of your tickets are sold. I will say that in 20 years, 28 years after working there. I don't need to work down there to understand common sense issues. I don't need an exact % to understand common sense issues.

Now, and I have stated this several times over the years, perhaps the Orioles walk up numbers have increased since I was down there..with season ticket sales suffering so much(because they gave sucked), they may get more fans walking up now vs before...that's certainly possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't know the exact percentages, don't play the game. Period. I said it was over the majority, and I was right. You blathering at the mouth about 85% is just inane without proof.

You are discounting my posts again:

owever, what you ignore (and HAVE been ignoring) is that there are short term factors in play.

If in 5 home games, the weather was terrible for 2 of them, would the average attendance be accurate against the entire year? I'm curious if you'd even answer this. There have been 23 games, at the point of this thread we've had the following games:

3 against the Tigers

3 against the Rangers

4 against the Twins

3 against the Yankees

1? against the BoSox

For a total of: 14 games. That is 17% of the home games of the season. Not exactly the end all determinant. And even better:

1 of the Yankees games were postponed

1 of the Rangers games were postponed and made up the following game during a double header

1 of the Yankees games had crappy weather the entire day

2 other games had poor weather

That's a total of 5 of the 14 home games with bad weather, or 35% of the home games.

Weather plays a part in short term statistical data. It's just the way it works, because large variances in attendance can affect the average. It's not hard to understand. THEN, you throw in the following:

1. The Red Sox poor start. When the Red Sox are not playing well, their fans do not come out. Period. Look at the average attendance at Red Sox games that correspond to their losing (traveling, obviously not at home).

2. Economy. Ticket sales are down across ALL of MLB. There are only 9 teams out of 30 (see: 30%) that actually have attendance that is up. Hell, one of the teams that have attendance that is down is the Yankees.

3. Weather as said above (short term, can't use it once the year is over)

4. Losing

Go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't know the exact percentages, don't play the game. Period. I said it was over the majority, and I was right. You blathering at the mouth about 85% is just inane without proof.

You are discounting my posts again:

Go for it.

Are you on your period or something? I am not discounting anything.

BTW, what percentages have you provided? You showed one season. I have years of declining attendance tied into losing and I worked down there and still have contact with some in the ticket office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you on your period or something? I am not discounting anything.

BTW, what percentages have you provided? You showed one season. I have years of declining attendance tied into losing and I worked down there and still have contact with some in the ticket office.

Aside from 2004, I don't. But neither do you. You've worked there. Either you get the results or I call my contacts on Monday. No biggie. They should be able to confirm your 85% number easily right?

Anyways, you're discounting my post because you refuse to respond to the meat of it and instead choose to focus entirely on the weather and a number that you can't even prove yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive me, SG. But, while I understand that the "vast majority" of tickets are sold prior to the beginning of the season, and the importance of selling season tickets . . . I do not understand why it is not important, or worth their while, for the Orioles to hustle a bit and try to sell as many tickets as possible during the season.

Yeah, attendance is down across MLB. Don't you think it is time to start thinking outside of the box and stop relying on the "that's how we have always done it" mentality?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me, or are the giveaways this year worse than ever? I didn't notice any giveaways for kids. I remember when I was little, they would advertise giveaway nights on tv and I would always beg my dad to take me to those games. Wonder if that's the Orioles fault or advertisers not wanting to spend the money? Maybe the O's could split the cost with advertisers, or maybe work with multiple advertisers to put two ads on one hat or something. Or a mini bat with 100 ads on it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aside from 2004, I don't. But neither do you. You've worked there. Either you get the results or I call my contacts on Monday. No biggie. They should be able to confirm your 85% number easily right?

Anyways, you're discounting my post because you refuse to respond to the meat of it and instead choose to focus entirely on the weather and a number that you can't even prove yet.

Actually, I am not responding to the rest of your post because really, I have nothing else to say. I don't disagree with the economy issue and things like that.

This all started because of your idiotic weather stuff...I have harped on that because you keep mentioning it as if its important after a few games in April and that the attendance has some great effect because of it...You are wrong.

I have no idea what your ticket person can confirm. When I was down there, they never showed us exact numbers...its all a guess based off of info that I know.

But, as I said, perhaps because the team has sucked so bad and they have lost so many season ticket holders, that maybe they get more walk up now than before...Maybe they sell more of those packages in season than before.

But what I do know is that the lifeblood of the ticket sales is season tickets and group sales and that, in the recent past(within the last 5 years or so), the Orioles were averaging around a 3000 walk up, which gives you somewhere in the area of 225-250K walk up ticket sales a year.

So, if you have 1.8M fans and you get 250K in walk ups, that is only about 14% of your ticket sales, which is why i said 85% sold preseason...But that is probably off because when i said that, i didn't consider the 6 pack stuff and little promos like that. But I would bet that walk up% is pretty close to accurate at this point.

Perhaps the dugout club stuff has greatly increased?

I don't know...But I do know for a 100% fact that the reason for the huge decline in attendance is because the team has sucked. There is no doubt about that. You can talk about the economy and things like that but if this team had been winning, then the stadium would be more full game in and game out.

You may not like that simplisitic answer but that doesn't make it less true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive me, SG. But, while I understand that the "vast majority" of tickets are sold prior to the beginning of the season, and the importance of selling season tickets . . . I do not understand why it is not important, or worth their while, for the Orioles to hustle a bit and try to sell as many tickets as possible during the season.

Yeah, attendance is down across MLB. Don't you think it is time to start thinking outside of the box and stop relying on the "that's how we have always done it" mentality?

Who said this isn't important?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...