Jump to content

A couple of requests for Joe Jordan


Recommended Posts

Concerning the O's first round pick:

1) No surprises. This draft appears deep enough that several of the highly touted prospects that will be available would be good picks. Don't try to out do everyone with a surprise pick.

2) Pick a college player. Help for the major league team in the short team is preferable to waiting 5 years. Example Aaron Crow who is currently in the Royals pen instead of Hobgood in A Ball. (If its a HS player he better project to be in the majors in 2 years). The O's window for contending with the current group of young players would benefit from having help in 2 years.

Past that, good luck Joe. Good luck is always a good thing to have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very high on either Bundy or Bubba at #4. It be nice to have another premium prospect like Manny in our system and in my mind Sterling is the best position prospect behind Rendon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Concerning the O's first round pick:

1) No surprises. This draft appears deep enough that several of the highly touted prospects that will be available would be good picks. Don't try to out do everyone with a surprise pick.

2) Pick a college player. Help for the major league team in the short team is preferable to waiting 5 years. Example Aaron Crow who is currently in the Royals pen instead of Hobgood in A Ball. (If its a HS player he better project to be in the majors in 2 years). The O's window for contending with the current group of young players would benefit from having help in 2 years.

Past that, good luck Joe. Good luck is always a good thing to have.

You could just as easily give an example showing a college pitcher who never made it compared to a high school pitcher who became a big star. I tend to agree with you that I'd prefer a more majors-ready player, but I don't think your example really illuminates anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what you are saying is that our system does not need another Manny Machado if one was available?

Joe Jordan is who he is because he trusts his scouts and has good judgement. If you don't trust JJ, that's fine. Otherwise, let him do his job and pick his players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Concerning the O's first round pick:

1) No surprises. This draft appears deep enough that several of the highly touted prospects that will be available would be good picks. Don't try to out do everyone with a surprise pick.

2) Pick a college player. Help for the major league team in the short team is preferable to waiting 5 years. Example Aaron Crow who is currently in the Royals pen instead of Hobgood in A Ball. (If its a HS player he better project to be in the majors in 2 years). The O's window for contending with the current group of young players would benefit from having help in 2 years.

Past that, good luck Joe. Good luck is always a good thing to have.

I've heard the Orioles are looking very hard at a few college arms for their top pick. Hopefully that holds true since I agree with you, unless you have an opportunity for a "can't miss" Machado type high school pick, the Orioles need to lean college heavy in this draft, especially with their 1st few picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard the Orioles are looking very hard at a few college arms for their top pick. Hopefully that holds true since I agree with you, unless you have an opportunity for a "can't miss" Machado type high school pick, the Orioles need to lean college heavy in this draft, especially with their 1st few picks.

Totally agree Tony...They need some "help you soon" picks if they make sense.

I am hoping that Rendon is slipping some and we can get him...That would be a dream pick IMO.

If not, Hutlzen sounds like the guy to get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This small quote was noted in an ESPN Insider blog:

Rice third baseman Anthony Rendon and UCLA right-hander Gerrit Cole remain the top two prospects but that doesn't necessarily mean they'll go 1-1 and 1-2.

Other names in the conversation include Virginia southpaw Danny Hultzen, Cole's teammate and fellow right-hander Trevor Bauer, and perhaps Gardner-Edgerton star centerfielder Bubba Starling. But this is a draft class full of potential impact talent, so we won't fixate on the top few picks in this week's look at the stock market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard the Orioles are looking very hard at a few college arms for their top pick. Hopefully that holds true since I agree with you, unless you have an opportunity for a "can't miss" Machado type high school pick, the Orioles need to lean college heavy in this draft, especially with their 1st few picks.

At Fanfest, MacPhail said that he basically leaves the picks up to Jordan, but that he (MacPhail) typically preferred to use the top pick on a pitcher unless there was a clearly superior hitter available, and that Jordan knows this. I'm sure a college pitcher would suit MacPhail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Concerning the O's first round pick:

1) No surprises. This draft appears deep enough that several of the highly touted prospects that will be available would be good picks. Don't try to out do everyone with a surprise pick.

2) Pick a college player. Help for the major league team in the short team is preferable to waiting 5 years. Example Aaron Crow who is currently in the Royals pen instead of Hobgood in A Ball. (If its a HS player he better project to be in the majors in 2 years). The O's window for contending with the current group of young players would benefit from having help in 2 years.

Past that, good luck Joe. Good luck is always a good thing to have.

Counterexample: Crow who has already been transitioned to relief over Mike Trout who is the #2 prospect in baseball. Give me a superstar in five years over a reliever in two.

Not to say I definitely want Starling or Bundy, but to say the Orioles should only look at college players is beyond foolish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Counterexample: Crow who has already been transitioned to relief over Mike Trout who is the #2 prospect in baseball. Give me a superstar in five years over a reliever in two.

Not to say I definitely want Starling or Bundy, but to say the Orioles should only look at college players is beyond foolish.

Crow may not stay in the pen.

My post is about this years draft, so are you saying that Starling or Bundy are superstars? I have not heard that any of the high school players measure up to Machado. If that is true then a college player looks like the best pick to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the subject of picking college players, you guys don't remember 2007?

http://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?query_type=franch_year&team_ID=BAL&year_ID=2007&draft_type=&

I remember following this draft here and people being a little concerned that we drafted I think 7 high schoolers in the entire draft. It was college guy after college guy for the first 15 rounds (though with some JCs thrown in). And so far all we have to show for it are the first two picks, Wieters and Arrieta. Now, to be fair, we didn't have picks in rounds 2-4. But we also followed that up with a college heavy draft in 2008 (16 HSers if I counted correctly) and all we have to show for that is Matusz. And the three best prospects after him from that draft were high schoolers (Hoes, Bundy and Avery), two of them picked in rounds 2-3.

For every Aaron Crow there's probably four dozen Tim Bascoms. I realize that's a round 1 vs round 4 comparison, so I will throw out the name Chris Smith and go hide under something while you guys throw things at me for speaking his name. ;)

I have a general preference for college players, all things being equal, especially at the top of the board, but you can't go crazy with it and overlook HS guys who are good risks in the right situation. Even in rounds 2-5 there are going to be college players whose upsides maybe aren't where you want them to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crow may not stay in the pen.

My post is about this years draft, so are you saying that Starling or Bundy are superstars? I have not heard that any of the high school players measure up to Machado. If that is true then a college player looks like the best pick to me.

Have you been paying any attention at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In his ESPN chat today, Keith Law said that the Orioles were thought to be in on Jed Bradley but that they may have cooled on the lefty. He keeps hearing college arm for the O's, possibly Bauer, but that Bundy is as advanced as some of the college arms so they may go with him. FWIW, Law is very high on Bundy. On Bauer, he says every team, except Seattle, in the top eight is probably looking at Bauer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the subject of picking college players, you guys don't remember 2007?

http://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?query_type=franch_year&team_ID=BAL&year_ID=2007&draft_type=&

I remember following this draft here and people being a little concerned that we drafted I think 7 high schoolers in the entire draft. It was college guy after college guy for the first 15 rounds (though with some JCs thrown in). And so far all we have to show for it are the first two picks, Wieters and Arrieta. Now, to be fair, we didn't have picks in rounds 2-4. But we also followed that up with a college heavy draft in 2008 (16 HSers if I counted correctly) and all we have to show for that is Matusz. And the three best prospects after him from that draft were high schoolers (Hoes, Bundy and Avery), two of them picked in rounds 2-3.

For every Aaron Crow there's probably four dozen Tim Bascoms. I realize that's a round 1 vs round 4 comparison, so I will throw out the name Chris Smith and go hide under something while you guys throw things at me for speaking his name. ;)

I have a general preference for college players, all things being equal, especially at the top of the board, but you can't go crazy with it and overlook HS guys who are good risks in the right situation. Even in rounds 2-5 there are going to be college players whose upsides maybe aren't where you want them to be.

I am only talking about the 1st round. After that it a different story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...