Jump to content

Ask Greg Bader: Opening a Dialogue with Orioles fans


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 268
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm sure Greg can't wait to use what little free time he has to answer all these questions.

This is what he said he wanted. To enter discourse with the loyal fan base who not only spends money with the Orioles, but pays money to support a site dedicated to their success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Bader:

Several people have noted that the youth of the Baltimore area no longer have interest in the Orioles. You do understand, don't you, that doing community charity work is not the answer to this disinterest, that the only thing that will change this is winning. Right? Some of your responses have led me to believe that perhaps the organization has lost sight of the importance of Wins and Losses. The Orioles aren't a philanthropic institution -- they're a baseball team -- and it's Wins and Losses that matter to its fans.

That's how I feel. Is that how you feel?

Thanks,

justD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several people have noted that the youth of the Baltimore area no longer have interest in the Orioles. You do understand, don't you, that doing community charity work is not the answer to this disinterest, that the only thing that will change this is winning. Right? Some of your responses have led me to believe that perhaps the organization has lost sight of the importance of Wins and Losses. The Orioles aren't a philanthropic institution -- they're a baseball team -- and it's Wins and Losses that matter to its fans.

That's how I feel. Is that how you feel?

I don't think anyone at the Orioles understands that you become a benefactor to the community when you have been successful at what your customers pay you to do. I don't believe that Peter Angelos is an individual with bad intent..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several people have noted that the youth of the Baltimore area no longer have interest in the Orioles. You do understand, don't you, that doing community charity work is not the answer to this disinterest, that the only thing that will change this is winning. Right? Some of your responses have led me to believe that perhaps the organization has lost sight of the importance of Wins and Losses. The Orioles aren't a philanthropic institution -- they're a baseball team -- and it's Wins and Losses that matter to its fans.

That's how I feel. Is that how you feel?

I was one who, as a teacher, discussed the disinterest of the youth. However, I tied winning heavily into the equation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone at the Orioles understands that you become a benefactor to the community when you have been successful at what your customers pay you to do. I don't believe that Peter Angelos is an individual with bad intent..

Maybe bad intent to ruin a franchise. Knowingly or unknowingly he has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly, you are probably correct. Being an optimist, I hold out hope that there are one or two people in the organization who have some sense and a heart.

That maybe one or two do care, but I doubt by the product on the field and lack of voice or vision or viability by ownership, that the majority do not care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • For one thing, they don’t have Bautista shutting things down in the 9th inning or extra innings.   Second, 30-16 just doesn’t happen every year.  I’m actually pretty encouraged that the O’s have played .650 baseball without winning a disproportionate number of close games.    
    • Four more shutout innings for Chace last night, 2 hits, 3 walks, 6 strikeouts.   His ERA is 0.91, WHiP 1.21, K/9 12.7.   The only blemish is his 5.2 BB/9.   He’s pitched 8 games and has only allowed runs in two of them.   Yesterday he threw 45 of 68 pitches for strikes.  For some reason the O’s kind of have him under wraps, as he’s only been allowed to exceed 70 pitches twice, back in April.  He’s also been kept to four inning outings.  They’re clearly being very careful with the 20-year old (turns 21 in three weeks).  In fairness, they did need to shut him down for a month late last summer, so I’m guessing it’s more season load management than game-by-game decisions.   In any event, it’s been a promising campaign for Chace.    
    • I mean, I don't want to denigrate your experience, but I think you're underestimating the power potential of elite athletes.  The leg strength required to send a grown man 20 mph from a dead stop is the same leg strength required to do a deadlift, or do a squat.  Can your buddy run a 4.5 40?
    • The Orioles were 30-16 in one-run games in 2023. They are 6-6 this year so far. Orioles magic hasn’t been there this year, at least so far. What changed?
    • I can’t even believe the grasping of straws going on here.  Why don’t we just bring up every guy at Norfolk who has an .800+ OPS, since they’re obviously better than their major league counterparts?  Oh wait, everyone at Norfolk has an .800+ OPS! As to Mullins, yes he’s looked awful at the plate for a month, but the O’s are nowhere near the point of regularly benching him or pinch hitting for him in key situations vs. RHP.   You know why?   Because even good players have slumps, and the best way to get them out of it is to keep playing them until they emerge from them.  And Mullins has a long enough track record where the odds of him coming out of this eventually are decent.  Not 100%, but a lot more likely than not.  I mean, the guy had an .859 OPS the first 3 weeks of the season.  That guy didn’t have some instantaneous physical decline that has turned him into the second coming of Chris Davis permanently.  I know it’s frustrating to watch him right now.  I’m as frustrated as anyone.   But every major league team would be doing what the Orioles have been doing, for another 4-6 weeks at a minimum.  
    • But it doesn't really matter if correlation implies causation, because we can at least infer that people with fast 40 times have a good chance of being able to squat 2.5x their body weight, regardless of whether there is a causative relationship.  And we have verifiable data thay many football players at skill positions are able to squat large amounts of weight that would be out of reach of many other people even given the same amount of training and diet.  So with both if these things in hand we can safely assume that these lifting numbers are achievable for most elite athletes, which Holliday qualifies as.  So I don't think we should be shocked or skeptical that he's able to pull these numbers.    I'd also be shocked if there wasn't a causative relationship between 40 times and lifting heavy.  Lifting large amounts of weight requires powerful muscles in the legs.  Running really fast also requires powerful muscles in the legs.  You can get in the weeds about muscle fiber type but to me if you're good at one, there's a great chance thay you're at least moderately good at the other.
    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...