Jump to content

Jason Hammel has a No-Hitter through 7 Innings


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think part of the reason many of us here on the OH respect this tradition (ok, superstition, if you like), is because it reflects not just an understanding of the game, but a greater understanding of how players play the game. I can pretty much guarantee everyone that by or after the 5th inning, the words "no-hitter" were not spoken by anyone in the O's dugout. If it's your contention that it's a silly observance, well, hey, you're probably right, and can we can all debate the merits of your stance. But if you were a player at any level in any dugout and you did that, and the pitcher lost his no-hitter, you'd likely get reminded of this tradition in a not-so-friendly manner by one of your teammates.

I learned this playing little league at the age of 12, when I said something about my pitcher's no-hitter, which he lost in the 9th inning. Our third baseman took my glove after the game and threw it in a nearby pond. Ha Ha. I explained this all to my dad when I got home. He took me to get a new one almost immediately and said, "I think you learned your lesson. Don't ever talk about a no-hitter when your pitcher's got one going..."

OK, fair enough. The next time we have a pitcher with a no-no, I promise that I won't say a word on the game thread or on the main board.

And then, when our pitcher does hang on for the complete-game no-hitter, you can say that it was because I didn't jinx him. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, fair enough. The next time we have a pitcher with a no-no, I promise that I won't say a word on the game thread or on the main board.

And then, when our pitcher does hang on for the complete-game no-hitter, you can say that it was because I didn't jinx him. ;)

Money. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know what a lot of people's drink of choice is on this site, WINE! :D

But really, some people take superstitions too seriously. Just watch the game, whatever happens, happens. Only the players decide what happens. There are no baseball Gods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, fair enough. The next time we have a pitcher with a no-no, I promise that I won't say a word on the game thread or on the main board.

And then, when our pitcher does hang on for the complete-game no-hitter, you can say that it was because I didn't jinx him. ;)

Attaboy. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at the game and was talking about thee no hitter after the third. Superstitions are silly

I was at the game and referred to it as "That thing we're not talking about."

I began texting friends in the sixth saying things like, "I'm not saying anything about it, but go check the amount of hits that Hammel has allowed."

I guess what I'm saying is it was more fun finding creative ways to talk about it without talking about it. Also, :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh come on. Everyone knows the superstition is the ballplayers making mention of it. Fans are excluded.

You know, between Ancient Runes, Potions, and Defense against the Dark Arts, some people just couldn't fit Baseball Mysticism into their schedules.

Sure am glad you audited the course, though ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TO take a bit of the heat off the OP Thorne opened his stupid mouth and said point blank Hammel has a no hitter through 7 innings . I knew that idiot wouldn't be able to control himself and one Hammel pitch later, boom.!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TO take a bit of the heat off the OP Thorne opened his stupid mouth and said point blank Hammel has a no hitter through 7 innings . I knew that idiot wouldn't be able to control himself and one Hammel pitch later, boom.!
In defense of announcers, I have to cut them some slack, that I wouldn't give to the OP. Thorne and his like have a responsiblity to report the news of the game. Many people could be tuning in, in the middle of things.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In defense of announcers, I have to cut them some slack, that I wouldn't give to the OP. Thorne and his like have a responsiblity to report the news of the game. Many people could be tuning in, in the middle of things.

Meh, 90% of announcers aren't going to say anything. At least not come right out directly and say "Hammel has a no hitter through 7. Hint around it , yes, but not come out directly and say it.

I think it was Palmer, not Thorn.

No, as they were running off the field after the top of the inning Thorne says "Hammel has a no hitter through 7".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vin Scully has always announced it after 7. He never says a word until they are going into the 8th, when he makes it a point to let everyone know because we could be watching history.

I think the last two innings are fair game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...