Jump to content

Are we about to lose Steve Johnson?


Aglets

Recommended Posts

Source: http://www.masnsports.com/steve_melewski/2012/05/a-decision-is-looming-for-steve-johnson-and-the-orioles.html

Dude has an ERA for the year under 3.00 and a WHIP under 1.00.

I understand he's no Dylan Bundy, but are the Orioles really going to be playing with fire here? I don't think they can afford to let this guy just walk away even if he may just end up being Berken 2.0 some day. The way we are pitching at the big league level right now, Johnson's turn might be coming this summer.

Would you like to see him added to the 40 man to prevent him from exercising his opt out?

I'd rather see him over Mahoney, Tillman, or maybe Adams on the 40 man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Source: http://www.masnsports.com/steve_melewski/2012/05/a-decision-is-looming-for-steve-johnson-and-the-orioles.html

Dude has an ERA for the year under 3.00 and a WHIP under 1.00.

I understand he's no Dylan Bundy, but are the Orioles really going to be playing with fire here? I don't think they can afford to let this guy just walk away even if he may just end up being Berken 2.0 some day. The way we are pitching at the big league level right now, Johnson's turn might be coming this summer.

Would you like to see him added to the 40 man to prevent him from exercising his opt out?

I'd rather see him over Mahoney, Tillman, or maybe Adams on the 40 man.

I would remove Adams or Mahoney from the 40 man. You have to eventually reward a guy that is putting up good numbers at AAA (even though he probably won't be anything more than a #5 starter or long reliever).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I am mistaken, they don't need to remove anyone as there are only 38 on the 40-man (not 39)

http://mlb.mlb.com/team/roster_40man.jsp?c_id=bal

Looking at the roster again, I think this is correct. Guys on the 60 day DL don't count right?

So hopefully Duquette just gives him one of those spots there and this isn't even a conversation piece. He does seem to want to have it go down to the wire though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is pretty easy. Add him to the 40-man roster. He's pitched well enough to be given an opportunity this year if a need arises and with Pomeranz' injury, that one less guy ahead of him on the deep depth chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the roster again, I think this is correct. Guys on the 60 day DL don't count right?

So hopefully Duquette just gives him one of those spots there and this isn't even a conversation piece. He does seem to want to have it go down to the wire though.

Right.

Looks like Miguel Gonzalez is about to get a spot on the 40 man. So there appears to be one final spot open for Steve Johnson still, pending more roster action.

Actually, the 40-man was at 39, not 38. Exposito wasn't listed for some reason. Melewski was correct.

So, with the addition of Gonzalez the 40 is full once again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right.

Actually, the 40-man was at 39, not 38. Exposito wasn't listed for some reason. Melewski was correct.

So, with the addition of Gonzalez the 40 is full once again.

OK, cool, thanks for the clarification. I didn't notice that the Expo was missing.

So with a full 40 man, this thread becomes much more interesting again. Someone has to GO if we are to make room for Steve Johnson.

I'll stand by my original 3 (Tillman, Mahoney, Adams) and I might even add Expo to the mix in terms of guys that I think we could DFA to make room for Steve.

Or, obviously, we can add B-Rob to the 60 Day DL but if they haven't done THAT by now it seems like they are not going to period unless he has a serious setback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see the O's DFA'ing Nick Johnson in order to make room for Steve. The Major League position player situation gets complicated with the return of Reimold and Reynolds (and Roberts?). Kind of hard to carry a 1B/DH on the bench, especially one who hasn't been hitting - and doubt either side (O's or Johnson) are very interested in him continuing on for Norfolk. Would have to imagine Nick is out the door before someone like Joe Mahoney or Zach Phillips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Source: http://www.masnsports.com/steve_melewski/2012/05/a-decision-is-looming-for-steve-johnson-and-the-orioles.html

Dude has an ERA for the year under 3.00 and a WHIP under 1.00.

I understand he's no Dylan Bundy, but are the Orioles really going to be playing with fire here? I don't think they can afford to let this guy just walk away even if he may just end up being Berken 2.0 some day. The way we are pitching at the big league level right now, Johnson's turn might be coming this summer.

Would you like to see him added to the 40 man to prevent him from exercising his opt out?

I'd rather see him over Mahoney, Tillman, or maybe Adams on the 40 man.

You could put stu on the 60 day disabled list. He could pitch in the minors in 40 days. An oblique will take that long for a pitcher. He felt it go pop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave and I had a real nice talk about this subject. I won't go into detail, but if Steve had not gotten hurt, I am sure he would have shopped himself. I suspect that is not something he would want to do with the fact that he is coming close to the top of the depth chart for the Orioles. He is a good kid and a nice pitcher. I wish him the best wherever he end up and whatever his choice is. Buck obviously has an interest in keeping him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've got to keep him. His numbers this year have been stellar and it's hard to believe it, but he's still only 24. He's really made some nice adjustments since last year. I know his upside may be limited but I don't see much in Norfolk that I would pick over him. Put him on the 40.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get this whole thread. Does Steve Johnson have an opt out clause? He's not on the 40 man. We can't lose him until the end of the season if he's a 6 year minor league FA.

Read the article. :)

While no one is saying much publicly right now, Johnson reportedly has an out clause in his contract that would allow him to get out of his contract and leave the organization if he is not put on the 40-man roster by June 1.

The deadline for the O's to add him is midnight Friday. After that it is Johnson's choice whether to stay or leave his hometown team. If the O's elect to not put him on the 40-man and another team is ready to do that, Johnson could opt to go to the other club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • A good manager would have instructed him to bunt Well not for nothing, but I would like 100 dollars for every time a Good Manager did not bunt with first and second with nobody out. Now if the SF pitcher was LH, I would be onboard. If they were down by 1, maybe. Why would you not let Mullins hit there?
    • Putting aside the issue of “not counting” stats that don’t fit the argument, I’m curious who he would have had hit there. What were the other options? Eloy Jimenez (1 for his last 23) Coby Mayo (3 for 37 with 21 Ks as a pro) Jackson Holliday (0 for last 22 vs LHPs  with 12 Ks) Livan Soto (~.600 career AAA OPS vs LHPs)   Not saying Slater was some slam dunk pick, but I honestly don’t really even understand how folks can criticize Hyde for those types of decisions anymore. Every lever he has available to pull is clearly marked *WRONG* in flashing red lights. 
    • Is it really the injuries?  
    • People born in 1984 are 40 now and have never seen the O’s get past the ALCS
    • Really tired of the losing, but even more tired of the team not playing the game the right way. Giants losing by a run get men on 1st and 2nd no outs, and their next guy lays down a nice bunt. Kremer slips fielding the roller and next thing you know they got bases loaded no outs, and a couple minutes later three runs have crossed the plate. We have the same situation in the 7th inning and our best bunt guy up to bat, and what does Hyde do? He has Mullins (0-3 at that point w/o hitting the ball out of the infield) swing away. WTF. Mullins strikes out, and our runners are eventually stranded.    At the very least Mullins should shown bunt. He didn’t. A good manager would have instructed him to bunt. Hyde didn’t. His team lost the game, and more importantly his team deserved to lose. That’s what really pisses me off. 
    • Rivera and Soto should be playing over Holliday and Mayo until Westburg and Urias return. It's what Buck would have done in 2014.
    • Many of us aren’t all that young anymore…
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...