Jump to content

Adam LaRoche To Washington


Brendan25

Recommended Posts

No Adam isn't a MOO hitter IMO. He is a 2 or 5 hitter. He doesn't get on base enough.

When i think MOO hitter, I think of a guy that gets on base and has a high RBI total (meaning they can drive in runs and hit with runners on).

Also when I say MOO I think 3 or 4 hitter.

That's why I don't like the term; it's too vague for my taste. I think most people on the board include no. 5 hitters in their definition (after all, that's the true middle of the order).

Average AL production at no. 3: .264/.343/.457

Average AL production at no. 4: .274/.348/.463

Average AL production at no. 5: .261/.318/.442

Mike Morse (career): .295/.347/.492. That sounds like a MOO hitter to me, no matter where you slot him. The last two years, he has mostly batted either 4th or 5th.

Jones had a higher OPS than the average no. 3 or 4 hitter last year, but his OBP was a little lower than is typical at those slots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply
How does JTrea justify grouping Smoak with Stanton and Willingham? Smoak is 26 years old - he's strictly a 1Bman coming off a year with a .654 OPS and has a lifetime OPS around .680. Maybe he'll come around some year, but he's strictly a long-shot.

He wanted to draft Smoak instead of Matusz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You aren't getting Morse for just Patton.

Quote is from Bowden on Twitter.

Why not? Contract/value-wise, Patton is probably worth more than Morse. And certainly so to the Nationals, since Morse is on their bench. If another team wants to overpay by even more than that, let them. I would be surprised if Morse brings much more value than Patton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if he has a low BABIP this year or a low LD%? His OBP will go down. I want my MOO to be a guy that can draw a walk when he needs to. His BB:K ratio is atrocious
His BABIP and LD% has beed faily consistent as well. If healthy what you see is what you get, at least for a year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Four more shutout innings for Chace last night, 2 hits, 3 walks, 6 strikeouts.   His ERA is 0.91, WHiP 1.21, K/9 12.7.   The only blemish is his 5.2 BB/9.   He’s pitched 8 games and has only allowed runs in two of them.   Yesterday he threw 45 of 68 pitches for strikes.  For some reason the O’s kind of have him under wraps, as he’s only been allowed to exceed 70 pitches twice, back in April.  He’s also been kept to four inning outings.  They’re clearly being very careful with the 20-year old (turns 21 in three weeks).  In fairness, they did need to shut him down for a month late last summer, so I’m guessing it’s more season load management than game-by-game decisions.   In any event, it’s been a promising campaign for Chace.    
    • I mean, I don't want to denigrate your experience, but I think you're underestimating the power potential of elite athletes.  The leg strength required to send a grown man 20 mph from a dead stop is the same leg strength required to do a deadlift, or do a squat.  Can your buddy run a 4.5 40?
    • The Orioles were 30-16 in one-run games in 2023. They are 6-6 this year so far. Orioles magic hasn’t been there this year, at least so far. What changed?
    • I can’t even believe the grasping of straws going on here.  Why don’t we just bring up every guy at Norfolk who has an .800+ OPS, since they’re obviously better than their major league counterparts?  Oh wait, everyone at Norfolk has an .800+ OPS! As to Mullins, yes he’s looked awful at the plate for a month, but the O’s are nowhere near the point of regularly benching him or pinch hitting for him in key situations vs. RHP.   You know why?   Because even good players have slumps, and the best way to get them out of it is to keep playing them until they emerge from them.  And Mullins has a long enough track record where the odds of him coming out of this eventually are decent.  Not 100%, but a lot more likely than not.  I mean, the guy had an .859 OPS the first 3 weeks of the season.  That guy didn’t have some instantaneous physical decline that has turned him into the second coming of Chris Davis permanently.  I know it’s frustrating to watch him right now.  I’m as frustrated as anyone.   But every major league team would be doing what the Orioles have been doing, for another 4-6 weeks at a minimum.  
    • But it doesn't really matter if correlation implies causation, because we can at least infer that people with fast 40 times have a good chance of being able to squat 2.5x their body weight, regardless of whether there is a causative relationship.  And we have verifiable data thay many football players at skill positions are able to squat large amounts of weight that would be out of reach of many other people even given the same amount of training and diet.  So with both if these things in hand we can safely assume that these lifting numbers are achievable for most elite athletes, which Holliday qualifies as.  So I don't think we should be shocked or skeptical that he's able to pull these numbers.    I'd also be shocked if there wasn't a causative relationship between 40 times and lifting heavy.  Lifting large amounts of weight requires powerful muscles in the legs.  Running really fast also requires powerful muscles in the legs.  You can get in the weeds about muscle fiber type but to me if you're good at one, there's a great chance thay you're at least moderately good at the other.
    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...