Jump to content

Adam LaRoche To Washington


Brendan25

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't see interest from Boston. In fact, reports yesterday were that they were close to finally finishing the Napoli deal.

Seattle can offer Furbush + ???

New York could offer Boone Logan, but he's only under contract through 2013.

Where/how would NYY utilize Morse?

I would think the stiffest competition will be Tampa and Seattle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morse roaming the spacious OF of Safeco would be...interesting.....

I go back to two years ago, when we obtained Reynolds and Hester for Hernandez and Mickolio, and Hardy and Harris for Jacobson and Hoey. Based on those deals, I'd say Patton for Morse is fair. Honestly, it favors the Nats.

I'd be very happy with that trade but listen to the the teams that are being mentioned a interested in Morse. Yankees, Boston, Indians, Tampa, Mariners. If half of them are for real the price could go up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morse roaming the spacious OF of Safeco would be...interesting.....

I go back to two years ago, when we obtained Reynolds and Hester for Hernandez and Mickolio, and Hardy and Harris for Jacobson and Hoey. Based on those deals, I'd say Patton for Morse is fair. Honestly, it favors the Nats.

I doubt the Nats are holding up the Hardy trade as a basis for their hopes. The Reynolds trade is perhaps a good barometer. I think Hernandez was worth more than Patton but I'm probably influenced by what I now know Hernandez has become.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morse roaming the spacious OF of Safeco would be...interesting.....

I go back to two years ago, when we obtained Reynolds and Hester for Hernandez and Mickolio, and Hardy and Harris for Jacobson and Hoey. Based on those deals, I'd say Patton for Morse is fair. Honestly, it favors the Nats.

It's fair but it depends on what other teams are offering. We may have to add a MiL prospect.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Morse a better 1B solution then Davis?

Neither play a great defensive game.

Davis has more power. Morse has shown consistency (relatively).

If Morse is acquired there is depth at 1B, whereas right now is Chris Davis backed up by a bunch of not 1B man.

But, with Morse do you DH Davis? If so he doesn't improve at 1B and we have this same debacle next year.

The depth and bat Morse brings makes him a good target, but I think giving up much more then Patton for 1B depth is hard to swallow. Although some other team will likely offer more for him. Hence...we aren't getting him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt the Nats are holding up the Hardy trade as a basis for their hopes. The Reynolds trade is perhaps a good barometer. I think Hernandez was worth more than Patton but I'm probably influenced by what I now know Hernandez has become.

I'd agree Hernandez was worth more than Patton. But at the time, Reynolds was worth more than Morse is worth now, IMO. He was a potential 3-year solution at 3B, younger than Morse, and less expensive in the first year than Morse will be next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where/how would NYY utilize Morse?

I would think the stiffest competition will be Tampa and Seattle.

DH, currently all they have there is Nunez. ARoid is not oplaying much if at all this year. They haven't even operated on his hip yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken Rosenthal ‏@Ken_Rosenthal

Source: #Nationals speaking to 5-6 teams about Morse. Earning $7M this season, then eligible for free agency.

You can just forget about the O's folks.

We will see. This is a huge part of DD off season. He has been talking about add a MOO bat since October. I expect him to in on Morse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morse would be a DH, not a 1B, in Baltimore.

Maybe, its would be a defensive competition in ST, methinks. Morse vs. Davis. In the end I bet they both get a decent number of games at 1B and DH.

But I'd like to see what Davis can do as a consistent 1B, we might have that position locked up for the next few years if he is given the chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If Elias could somehow magically combine Stowers and Kjerstad into one player, then the O's would really have something.  I think Kjerstad has a special bat, but his defense anywhere leaves a lot to be desired.  I don't know if Stowers can keep his Ks low enough to be an everyday player, but the O's should find out before Santander hits free agency.
    • Read the ninth post on page one I wrote. That should have been the last post in this dumpster fire of a thread. Lol
    • What if he bats .100 for the next month?
    • I agree. And I think he has a higher upside than Kjerstad because he's actually a very good fielder. He's a guy that I think deserves regular playing time.
    • Back when we DFA'd Bauman, I said the right move would have been sending down Akin. He's just not very good. Sure he'll tease you with a month or two of good ball but he's very average. Cano is Cano. He had his 15 minutes of fame. He intimidates no one. And that's what you need from a high leverage guy. Vieira --- no need mincing words here --- he's not just a project, he stinks. Everyone has tried to fix his command issue and everyone has failed.  On the other hand, while he's no Bautista I don't mind rolling with Kimbrel this year. I like Coulombe. I think Perez, Webb and Tate are "ok".  The overall issue is that this bullpen isn't the bullpen a championship squad needs. Elias should have known that. Maybe he thought the offense and starting pitching would make up for our bullpen deficiencies. No team is perfect, I get that. I just don't know how a guy as bright as Elias thought this bullpen would be good enough coming out of Spring Training. Let's hope he makes some moves to get us a couple quality relievers.
    • From my understanding of the data the impetus for pulling pitchers early is not (usually) due to pitcher fatigue or pitcher injury risk, but rather because they're not as good the 3rd/4th time thru the lineup.  But I think I'd rather have our starters go from good to mediocre the 3rd time thru the lineup, versus trusting the crappy members of our bullpen with the ball.  Granted Akin had a bad game today and he had been pretty good, but we also tried to have Cionel get thru 2 innings and he gives up a leadoff triple.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...