Jump to content

Rutgers


NJOriolesFan

Recommended Posts

Well the loser of this game(assuming it's close) will probably be just as deserving as a team such as Florida or Notre Dame. I just don't care for the most recent loser factor in the rankings. Yeah, maybe it should play a role, but not as much as it does.

I don't see why the loser of the OSU/Mich game is deserving of anything, much less a possible rematch for the national title.

Assuming Arkansas & Florida run the table and meet in the SEC championship game with 1 loss, I'd argue the winner should be the front runner for the National Championship spot and the loser should get consideration for an at large BCS bid. Based on the fact that they play an extra game, plus it's the two top teams in the conference at that.

Big 10/Pac 10 need to step up and play a conference championship like the SEC/Big12/ACC. Not having to play for a conference championship game is extemely unfair, IMO.

Arkanasas/Florida could finish the regular season as a 1 loss team and have to play each other in a pre-post season game, and the loser gets punished even though they would have had the same record as Mich/OSU had it not been for an extra game.

I've always felt either everyone should play a conference championship game or no one does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't see why the loser of the OSU/Mich game is deserving of anything, much less a possible rematch for the national title.

Assuming Arkansas & Florida run the table and meet in the SEC championship game with 1 loss, I'd argue the winner should be the front runner for the National Championship spot and the loser should get consideration for an at large BCS bid. Based on the fact that they play an extra game, plus it's the two top teams in the conference at that.

Big 10/Pac 10 need to step up and play a conference championship like the SEC/Big12/ACC. Not having to play for a conference championship game is extemely unfair, IMO.

Arkanasas/Florida could finish the regular season as a 1 loss team and have to play each other in a pre-post season game, and the loser gets punished even though they would have had the same record as Mich/OSU had it not been for an extra game.

I've always felt either everyone should play a conference championship game or no one does.

While you may be a Vol, I agree w/ you here.

I also think there is a big ABC/ESPN bias against the SEC, but I won't get into conspiracy theories now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While you may be a Vol, I agree w/ you here.

I also think there is a big ABC/ESPN bias against the SEC, but I won't get into conspiracy theories now.

CBS has the contract for the SEC, there's no bias, just maybe less coverage because of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why the loser of the OSU/Mich game is deserving of anything, much less a possible rematch for the national title.

Assuming Arkansas & Florida run the table and meet in the SEC championship game with 1 loss, I'd argue the winner should be the front runner for the National Championship spot and the loser should get consideration for an at large BCS bid. Based on the fact that they play an extra game, plus it's the two top teams in the conference at that.

Big 10/Pac 10 need to step up and play a conference championship like the SEC/Big12/ACC. Not having to play for a conference championship game is extemely unfair, IMO.

Arkanasas/Florida could finish the regular season as a 1 loss team and have to play each other in a pre-post season game, and the loser gets punished even though they would have had the same record as Mich/OSU had it not been for an extra game.

I've always felt either everyone should play a conference championship game or no one does.

If USC wins out, I don't see how you can put Arkansas above them in the title game, don't even see an arguement for it. USC went to Arkansas and beat them 50-14! And it's not like USC has played a cream puff schedule with Ark, Nebraska, Cal, and ND on their schedule along with the rest of the PAC-10. BTW, Florida hasn't played that tough of a schedule considering they're in the SEC, and they haven't been too convincing either.

Concerning your second statement which I bolded, the only reasons those conferences play a conference title game is money and the fact that they can't play every team during the regular season. Blame those conferences for any unfairness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My first correct prediction !!!

Great call.

Now it will be interesting to see where Michigan is ranked tommorow in the BCS. I wouldn't be shocked if their still #2. Will either be them or USC. Even if Michigan falls to 3rd or 4th, they have a decent shot at getting back to #2 with USC still having two rivalry games with ND and at UCLA, and Florida still having to play FSU and the SEC title game. I'd be very surprised if Arkansas or ND is above Michigan tommorow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If USC wins out, I don't see how you can put Arkansas above them in the title game, don't even see an arguement for it. USC went to Arkansas and beat them 50-14! And it's not like USC has played a cream puff schedule with Ark, Nebraska, Cal, and ND on their schedule along with the rest of the PAC-10. BTW, Florida hasn't played that tough of a schedule considering they're in the SEC, and they haven't been too convincing either.

Concerning your second statement which I bolded, the only reasons those conferences play a conference title game is money and the fact that they can't play every team during the regular season. Blame those conferences for any unfairness.

I say Michigan and Ohio State should play again, but if not I agree with you. USC clearly deserves it assuming they beat the terribly overrated Notre Dame team, and UCLA. They didnt look very good tonight,but found a way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great call.

Now it will be interesting to see where Michigan is ranked tommorow in the BCS. I wouldn't be shocked if their still #2. Will either be them or USC. Even if Michigan falls to 3rd or 4th, they have a decent shot at getting back to #2 with USC still having two rivalry games with ND and at UCLA, and Florida still having to play FSU and the SEC title game. I'd be very surprised if Arkansas or ND is above Michigan tommorow.

Thanks, and Thank God we dont have to hear any more about the Big East. I think Michigan will still be #2, but it'll be tough to hold off USC with the two games you mentioned still to come. Even though I think Notre Dame isnt in the same class as any of these teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep - good call with the Rutgers loss.

The craziness with the BCS is just pathetic. They really need to get their act together and figure out a playoff system. Go ahead and use the bowls, and rotate the title game if necessary - keep the corporations happy.

Why couldn't you take the conference winners and a number of "at-large" bids and give everyone a shot at the national championship? I'm missing the flaw in this idea. /shrug

Good games today though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep - good call with the Rutgers loss.

The craziness with the BCS is just pathetic. They really need to get their act together and figure out a playoff system. Go ahead and use the bowls, and rotate the title game if necessary - keep the corporations happy.

Why couldn't you take the conference winners and a number of "at-large" bids and give everyone a shot at the national championship? I'm missing the flaw in this idea. /shrug

Good games today though.

It really is crazy...There are a lot of really good teams out there and a lot of overrated ones as well. These would be weeded out with a playoff system, yet at the same time give a chance to a really good team that had a few fluke losses a chance to win a title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep - good call with the Rutgers loss.

The craziness with the BCS is just pathetic. They really need to get their act together and figure out a playoff system. Go ahead and use the bowls, and rotate the title game if necessary - keep the corporations happy.

Why couldn't you take the conference winners and a number of "at-large" bids and give everyone a shot at the national championship? I'm missing the flaw in this idea. /shrug

Good games today though.

One of the announcers of the OSU-Michigan game made an incredibly stupid comment on why the playoff system would be bad for college football. He said that there would be no reason for the coaches not to rest their star players for that game.:eek: There is no way in hell the star players would get rested in a OSU-UM game, especially considering they'd have at least 3 weeks off before the playoffs start.

BTW, concerning playoffs, I think anymore than 8 teams would be a huge mistake, and would prefer to keep it at 4 teams or maybe 6 at the most with the top 2 teams getting a bye. I think it's pretty rare to have more than 4 teams with a legit right to play for the title, and it's probably never more than 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really is crazy...There are a lot of really good teams out there and a lot of overrated ones as well. These would be weeded out with a playoff system, yet at the same time give a chance to a really good team that had a few fluke losses a chance to win a title.

I don't think that team should have a chance to play for the title. The regular season has to retain great importance imo, and letting a team compete for the title who lost 3 games greatly takes away from that importance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the announcers of the OSU-Michigan game made an incredibly stupid comment on why the playoff system would be bad for college football. He said that there would be no reason for the coaches not to rest their star players for that game.:eek: There is no way in hell the star players would get rested in a OSU-UM game, especially considering they'd have at least 3 weeks off before the playoffs start.

BTW, concerning playoffs, I think anymore than 8 teams would be a huge mistake, and would prefer to keep it at 4 teams or maybe 6 at the most with the top 2 teams getting a bye. I think it's pretty rare to have more than 4 teams with a legit right to play for the title, and it's probably never more than 6.

I heard that, it was Bob Davie and you're right, it made no sense.

I think there should be a sixteen team playoff, there certainly is enough time for it. My god, Ohio State and Michigan now get 6 weeks off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that team should have a chance to play for the title. The regular season has to retain great importance imo, and letting a team compete for the title who lost 3 games greatly takes away from that importance.

I hear you, but a Team like Texas or Auburn who are certainly talented enough should get a chance to redeem a few tough losses early in the season. Texas lost last weekend actually, but you see my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear you, but a Team like Texas or Auburn who are certainly talented enough should get a chance to redeem a few tough losses early in the season. Texas lost last weekend actually, but you see my point.

I don't think so unless you want to see the importance of the regular season greatly diminished. Auburn has also lost recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...