Jump to content

O's Willing to Trade Wieters Via Ken Rosenthal


andrewrickli

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Sources: <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Orioles&src=hash">#Orioles</a> willing to trade Wieters. Both Wieters and Chris Davis two years away from free agency and represented by Scott Boras.</p>— Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) <a href="

">November 13, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/400672985524502528

If we trade MW, do we sign a Salty or Ruiz?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Sources: <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Orioles&src=hash">#Orioles</a> willing to trade Wieters. Both Wieters and Chris Davis two years away from free agency and represented by Scott Boras.</p>— Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) <a href="
">November 13, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/400672985524502528

If we trade MW, do we sign a Salty or Ruiz?

Salty is a guy whos OBP is going to be below 300. He wont have the Green Monster to smash balls off of. This could get interesting.

I was told the complete opposite from a player with knowledge. He said, they aren't going anywhere, but it shows how fast things can change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This goes against everything I was told, but Rosenthal seems to think differently.

Rosenthal's tweet says that he hears the Orioles are willing to trade Wieters. All it says about Davis is that he, like Wieters, is 2 years away from free agency. He doesn't say that the Orioles are willing to trade Davis. Am I missing something?

https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/400672985524502528

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel sure that the O's would rather sign Wieters long term. But if he will not sign, a trade while his value is high this off season is something that Wieters would be forcing them into.

Exactly, and this may be a play to see if they cant expedite the extension talks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel sure that the O's would rather sign Wieters long term. But if he will not sign, a trade while his value is high this off season is something that Wieters would be forcing them into.

I am not sure the bolded is true. I do think that the O's see a difficult Arb situation this year with Matt. When was that last time an Arb player took a salary pay cut?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you may be misrepresenting what Rosenthal tweeted unless he said it elsewhere. His tweet was:

"Orioles willing to trade Wieters. Both Wieters and Chris Davis two years away from free agency and represented by Scott Boras."

Nowhere in that tweet does he say that the Orioles are willing to trade Davis. It just states that Davis is 2 years away from FA. To me that means they have 2 big contracts coming up in 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coming off a poor year theres no way Boras will let Wieters extend for less money.

Trade now or forever hold your peace.

Less money? I think both Boras and DD will look at Wieters as a 750 OPS guy. Not valuing him at his 2013 stats. So its realistic money not less money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure the bolded is true. I do think that the O's see a difficult Arb situation this year with Matt. When was that last time an Arb player took a salary pay cut?

I am sure the O's aren't looking to cut Matt's salary. He will get an increase. The question is how much and for a long term contract, how long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure the O's aren't looking to cut Matt's salary. He will get an increase. The question is how much and for a long term contract, how long.

Without extension, they will either have to offer him a 1 yr deal or go to Arb. I believe his 2013 salary was $5.5mm. Not completely sold the he would get an increase if it goes to Arb and my guess is that they aren't excited to give him a raise after 2013. Boras isn't going to negotiate a long term contract coming off the season he just had. Kind of a bad situation really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • There probably was no "right" choice and absolutely no "absolutely right choice" I was on record wanting to choose Abrahms and my logic was simple, a 1:1 is a chance to pick a HOF type talent A college catcher was a safe pick and Adley is having a nice career but he is clearly not a MVP/HOF type player.
    • Agreed, Akin is pitching too well to be optioned until there’s no other choices. Tate should certainly be optioned before him. The only reason I could see Akin needing to be optioned is if BOTH Means and Irvin end up in the pen (with Bradish, Kremer and Suárez starting). That’s possibly the best 5 SP right now if they believe Suárez > Means/Irvin. In which case you really can’t have 5 lefty RP and only one RHP to go with Kimbrel and Cano. Otherwise, they should carry 4 lefty RP (with one of Means/Irvin as the long man) before optioning Akin. 
    • The answer to the question is obviously no. Now if the question was would Gunnar have been worthy #1 pick the answer seems obvious that he would have been.    But taking him where he went allowed the Orioles to maximize their draft which is what every team hopes to do.    You can argue whether Adley was the right pick but if Gunnar went first there is no way the two picks work as well for Baltimore. 
    • 1080i video is redrawn a half frame (field) at 60 times per second.  Progressive footage like 1080p is 30 whole frames per second but often converted to interlaced format for transmission. If you are doing this on an ongoing basis, here's a suggestion: download the free version of one of the numerous non-linear editors out there like Avid or DaVinci Resolve and throw the clip on a timeline for your measurement.  Manually clicking through hundreds of frames seems like it would be needlessly cumbersome not to mention slow.  
    • This. I don’t get the Akin going down talk (even though it seems more based off his option remaining than performance). Right now Akin is arguably our 4th most trusted reliever (can argue with Webb) based off his usage and his peripherals are clearly in the top 4 with Cano, Kimbrel, and Coulombe. He might not be a setup guy but he’s a solid piece to have in the middle innings.   Akin’s K-BB% is nearly double that of Baumann’s in both of their careers as relievers. He K’s more, walks less, and gets more chases and whiffs.   Keeping Baumann over Akin even for a week isn’t a move that winning teams make. Not to trash him, but Baumann is just not good, so who cares if he gets claimed? He’s not trusted at this point late in close games unless the bullpen is overused, so if you lose him and need a replacement later in the year you have Heasley, Charles, and Tate (if he gets optioned). Then you also have Wells who should be a bullpen guy when he comes back. Having the flexibility is good but keeping one of your worst relievers just because he doesn’t have an option doesn’t seem like a good way to solve a log jam. 
    • Witt had hit tool questions on draft day, and Abrams was much less of a sure thing than Adley. Based on information known at the time, we absolutely made the right choice with Adley.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...