Jump to content

Orioles Receiving Interest In Wei-Yin Chen, Discussed Trade With Angels


oriolesacox

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Some have asked if listening on Kendrick means Os dont like Schoop. No, but Schoop does have minor lg options. An area of poss upgrade</p>? Dan Connolly (@danconnollysun) <a href="
">December 6, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That is very good to know. Hopefully we can use Chen to get a power hitter, or get some very good prospects for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd really like to see the O's make room in the rotation for Masterson. On a one year deal to reestablish value he could be next year's Nelson Cruz (though I'm certain it'd take more than 8 million). Trading Chen would be a good way to accomplish that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be supportive of dealing Chen this offseason for some help in the lineup - having six starters is great, and I'd love to keep all six (due to the near certainty of injury or ineffectiveness), but I'm just not sure it will be a luxury we can afford going into this season given some of our other needs. Chen is a guy whose value is probably never going to be higher, so may be able to get a decent haul in return. Only issue is we'd end up with 5 righty starters, which is far from ideal; I know Buck tried to sequence his starters and hold guys out versus certain teams to create more favorable matchups. Wouldn't be able to do that at all this year, and would underscore the need for effective lefties out of the pen, too.

Those negatives aside, still in favor of listening to what's out there and pulling the trigger if attractive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not big on trading a starter unless we get an ideal return. I would prefer prospects. Our farm is top heavy and could use improvement. I think Chen is the guy who would be the best one to trade. But I'd only do it if they have confidence in Bundy, Wilson, Berry, or Wright making 2016 starts. Maybe they go bring in Johan again.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not big on trading a starter unless we get an ideal return. I would prefer prospects. Our farm is top heavy and could use improvement. I think Chen is the guy who would be the best one to trade. But I'd only do it if they have confidence in Bundy, Wilson, Berry, or Wright making 2016 starts. Maybe they go bring in Johan again.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In June the O's have a 1st round pick, sandwich pick for Cruz, maybe a competitive balance pick (not sure of that). All all there other pick. They probably have money picks than money to paid them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In June the O's have a 1st round pick, sandwich pick for Cruz, maybe a competitive balance pick (not sure of that). All all there other pick. They probably have money picks than money to paid them.

Second round competitive balance pick. It is trade-able. It has nothing to do with any free agents though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In June the O's have a 1st round pick, sandwich pick for Cruz, maybe a competitive balance pick (not sure of that). All all there other pick. They probably have money picks than money to paid them.

I thought the more picks you have, the easier it is to play around with the money and sign players? Like last year, losing two picks not only hurt due to the loss of picks, but it hurt the amount of money the O's had to be creative with the rest of their picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chen is my favorite O's pitcher. I'd hate to see him go. He's grossly underrated by people on this site who constantly call him garbage.

I don't see him called garbage on here a lot. I would like to see him moved if we can get players of value back. If not, I have no problem going into next season with Chen in the rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...