Jump to content

For Chris Davis' and Baseballs sake, should "The Shift" be banned?


33rdst

Recommended Posts

This team will need a real First baseman in 2016. Christian Walker not the answer his D at first was awful last year when he played. Hardy was having problems throwing to a 6 foot tall first baseman.

Is your opinion of his defense based off of what you saw in the majors? If so that is idiotic to come to a conclusion on such a small sample.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Davis couldn't hit the fastball last year that was his problem not the shift.

Did there have to be one problem, at the exclusion of all others?

Maybe the shift knocked some signifcant # of points off his OPS, while his inability to get around on fastballs did as well.

It seems like people always have a tendency to try to identify ONE problem whenever there is a failure. Did the Ravens lose because of their secondary, or their playcalling, or ....?

I guess it's human nature to try to find one (and exactly one) scapegoat for every negative situation. But negative situations, or positive situations, are like everything else in life the product of a complex set of factors. Whenever I see an argument about "the reason the team lost is X", "no, the reason the team lost is Y", I almost have to laugh. What exactly are people arguing about. X & Y probably both contributed to the loss, and there is no single reason anything happens. Life is never that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely not. Hitters should learn to adjust to defensive positioning.

Also defining what constitutes a "shift" would be probamatic. Would lines be drawn on the field and players told not to cross these line? Or would this be a judgment call for the umpires to make?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely not. Hitters should learn to adjust to defensive positioning.

Also defining what constitutes a "shift" would be probamatic. Would lines be drawn on the field and players told not to cross these line? Or would this be a judgment call for the umpires to make?

Could the O's have Machado and Schoop switch positions everytime a left handed pull hitter came up?

Could make for a messy scorecard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a stupid idea to have illegal defense or restrict where a team can place their fielders. If a player were to hit 100% of their balls in the air to a 50 ft radius circle in the field, I would put all my non-pitcher/non-catcher fielders in that circle. That is strategy. It doesn't make sense to put them elsewhere. Then it would be up to the hitter to figure out how to not hit to that circle. The same thing applies to the shift. If a batter never hits to the left of second base, why put fielders over there. It is the batters fault that he does not take advantage of the 90 degrees of field that are given to him to hit. Yes, there are traditional positions in baseball, but the only place that a team is forced to place a fielder is on the mound and behind the plate. Where a team places all the other 7 players is up to that fielding team. Placing those players on the field is part of strategy. If a player doesn't like the fact that they put the shift on them, then they need to adapt or find a way to hit to another part of the field. If they cannot adapt, then I don't feel sorry for them. To change a rule because of the inadequacy of certain players to hit is a bad idea. The article acts like it is such a disadvantage to lefties, but it is only for those lefties who exclusively pull toward those shifted positions. The article uses Chris Davis as the classic example, but teams were putting that shift on Chris Davis in 2013 and he could beat it. In my opinion, Chris Davis looked like he hit the ball with more "authority" in 2013. When they put the shift in place in 2013, I was always amazed how Chris Davis would somehow seem to find a way to still beat it. Furthermore, a disadvantage for righties is that they have always had a few feet further to get down the first base line because their batters box is further from first base, but we never changed the location of first base to make it an even distance for lefties and righties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually Davis didn't beat the shift in 2013. He was effected more by shifts then any other player.

Of course when the ball goes over the fence it doesn't matter where the infielders are.

Sure a lot of things going on there. More Ks per AB for one. Also, 5% fewer flyballs and 7% lesser HR/FB in 2014 than 2013. Still more GB's and LD's (certainly as a percentage of balls put in play) were hit into the shift in 2014 than 2013. A 94 point drop in babip (from 2013 to 2014) isn't all from Flyballs and homeruns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The shift has been around since the 1920s.

It'll be in vogue until players make it a liability by changing the way they hit from pull hitters to all-field hitters. Then the shift will go out of vogue, and then hitters will start to pull hit again.

There isn't anything new under the sun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Utterly ridiculous idea.

Whats next pitchers can only throw 3 pitches cause all those extra pitches are hard hit?

If CD wont or cant hit the opposite way or simply learn how to bunt to make defenses pay because it will limit his power numbers then thats on him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
    • Or maybe he just is hesitant because he knows it’s best to give up a single than letting it get by you for a triple or inside the park homerun. I highly doubt Cowser gives a crap about WAR. There is nothing in the guy’s demeanor, personality, or anything that suggests he chases stats and places himself above the team. To say otherwise is quite ridiculous at best, and malicious at worst. He is a rookie and he will get more comfortable as he plays. With that comfortability will come trusting his ability more and more. Why even suggest a thing like you are suggesting? Just pathetic quite frankly on your part.
    • On the spot?  Maybe.   Even at full health, people would have accepted not winning the division because of the pace the Yankees are on.   We have a comfortable lead for the WC so if the Orioles can continue winning at a reasonable pace with Burnes/GRod/Kremer/Irvin/Povich/Suarez.   As far as the playoffs go, there’s only a few starters that inspire confidence in a playoff series that will be available.   Elias isn’t trading Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo.  He just isn’t.   He can get relievers without giving up top prospects.  The question is, can he get someone like Crochet without giving up those top 3?   Crochet, despite innings concerns, gives you a playoff starter plus someone who’ll be here after Burnes is gone. However, Crochet is an A.J. Preller type of move, not an Elias type of move.   If Povich looks the part of a ML starter AND no more starters go down, I could see Elias standing pat on the starters and fortifying the back end of the bullpen.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after the fourth round. San Diego Padres Compensation for Josh Hader. The Astros forfeited their second-round pick for signing Hader. San Diego Padres Compensation for Blake Snell. The Giants forfeited their third-round pick for signing Snell. Toronto Blue Jays Compensation for Matt Chapman. The Giants forfeited their second-round pick for signing Chapman.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did not exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after Competitive Balance Round B.   Los Angeles Angels Compensation for Shohei Ohtani. The Dodgers forfeited their second- and fifth-round picks for signing Ohtani.
    • picks If a team that loses a qualifying free agent is a revenue-sharing recipient and the free agent signs for at least $50 million, the team will be awarded a pick between the first round and Competitive Balance Round A.   Minnesota Twins Compensation for Sonny Gray. The Cardinals forfeited their second-round pick for signing Gray.
    • The answer appears to be, yes, you can receive more than one compensation picks. Angels -- Shohei Ohtani: Pick after Competitive Balance Round B Blue Jays -- Matt Chapman: Pick after Round 4 Cubs -- Cody Bellinger: Pick after Competitive Balance Round B Padres -- Blake Snell: Pick after Round 4 Padres -- Josh Hader: Pick after Round 4
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...