Jump to content

SBNation story about Leo Mazzone


Ori-Al

Recommended Posts

With the latest injured Oriole pitcher sparking fear of TJ surgery, I thought this article about former O's and Braves pitching coach Leo Mazzone would be of interest. Maybe his program of more throwing with less intensity might actually be better for pitchers. The way they're babied now in the minors and majors doesn't seem to be reducing injuries.

https://www.sbnation.com/longform/2015/5/13/8585249/leo-mazzone-profile-feature

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it probably all starts with how they throw in little league/high school/college.

Anything that minor and major league coaches do to try to thwart potential injury off at the past by correcting said pitcher's flawed mechanics is often just delaying the inevitable trip to Dr. Andrews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But even though the [Orioles] organization had been dogged in their pursuit of Mazzone (Perlozzo says his connection to Mazzone helped him land the manager job in the first place: ?At the time, I thought they were more interested in getting Leo than getting me.?), they questioned his methods almost from the beginning, when the medical staff suddenly canceled Camp Leo. ?The doctors and trainers said I couldn?t have anyone on the mound until they passed a physical,? says Mazzone. ?In Atlanta we did everything we could to keep the players on the field. In Baltimore, they did everything they could to keep them off.?

Oh boy. There's some interesting tidbits in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad his career ended on a down note. He sounds like a complex guy.

I don't know if complex is exactly how I would describe him. Some (maybe many) players these days can't take the direct, in-your-face coaching style. Many players just aren't used to his type of approach anymore. I don't know if that is the reason he hasn't been employed in so long or not but there certainly has to be some connection to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh boy. There's some interesting tidbits in there.

I kept telling people the lean years in Baltimore had less to do with the talent (though we had problems there too) and more to do with horrible management / development. The warehouse was a terrible work environment then.

Perlozzo introduced Mazzone to the team at spring training by essentially reciting the coach’s Atlanta r?sum?, and Mazzone could already sense the eye rolling that only worsened as time went on. “Nobody wanted to listen to our philosophy from Atlanta,” Mazzone says. “Other coaches were like ‘I’m tired of you talking about the Braves.’ It was a good ol’ boys club and these good ol’ boys had been losing for a long time. They didn’t particularly care for me coming in there with the contract that the Orioles gave me. They didn’t like it at all. They were scared to death.” Mazzone remembers driving up to the ballpark one day to find the orange cone Perlozzo had put out to mark Mazzone’s special parking spot crushed to bits — he suspects at the hands of another coach.

Jeez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mazzone believes the modern game’s infatuation with velocity is one of, if not the primary reason for the recent plague of Tommy John elbow-ligament replacement surgeries. “Now everybody seems to be getting a pass on all the sore arms,” he says. “I don’t get it. If we’d have had all the breakdowns that are happening now, there would have been a lot of pitching coaches fired.

Maybe we shouldn't worry so much about how Dylan Bundy is hitting the radar gun during his rehab??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe we shouldn't worry so much about how Dylan Bundy is hitting the radar gun during his rehab??

The issue is that the genie is out of the bottle. Some pitchers can dial it back a notch or two and still be effective. Maddux, Smoltz, Glavine probably fit in that mold. But I think a lot more pitchers are like Tommy Hunter. When pacing themselves to go 6 or 7 innings they're 5.00 ERA guys. If they paced themselves to go 9 in today's environment they'd be 6.00+ ERA guys. If you tell them to air it out and only face a limited set of batters they're much, much more effective. When Mazzone told Daniel Cabrera to dial it back all that happened was he was a guy with poor control and an average fastball. Tell Kurt Birkins and Brian Burres to throw at 80% and you get shelled like the 2007 Orioles. If baseball truly thought this tactic was going to lead to fewer injuries and a better game they'd incentivize it - they'd change some rules like limiting the number of pitchers on the roster, expanding the strike zone, deadening the ball, making bats thicker and heavier. It worked in the 60s because the strike zone was knees-to-shoulders, nobody worked out, teams had a lot of defensive specialists, parks were bigger, and a lot of hitters sacrificed power for contact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kept telling people the lean years in Baltimore had less to do with the talent (though we had problems there too) and more to do with horrible management / development. The warehouse was a terrible work environment then

Jeez.

If that happened that's being very petty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why you'd even sign this guy if you weren't willing to give him full control of pitching development in the organization, including the health of the players. The Orioles spent a lot of money getting him of all pitching coaches and then kind of hamstrung him with regards to the throwing program. How on Earth could they let the health staff cancel the throwing programs. That kind of stuff is the exact reason he was hired, basically to provide his own opinion and expertise on working out and training pitchers.

One of endless examples of bad-decision making during the 00's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...