Jump to content

Front Office issues


eddie83

Recommended Posts

Another article about Buck and Dan having tension as well as execs upset that Dan wasn't compensated for not going to Toronto. Execs say it was bush league that he wasn't allowed to leave. Also talk of budget.

If there are issues they need to be resolved now. This talk isn't healthy.

http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2015/09/19/ben-cherington-sees-fruits-his-labor-from-afar/CECkc8QALvvq4UOuI03GKJ/story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Nick Cafardo was also the source of the last story and I don't regard this as reporting anything new. I don't feel bad for Duquette at all, considering that Angelos ripped up his three-year deal after the 2012 season and extended him to 2018. Contracts are a two-way street. I'm not worried about "tensions," I'm worried because the O's are in a tenuous position with players leaving, a limited budget and a weak farm system. It's going to take an excellent offseason to get us back in contention in 2016. A lot of things will have to go right, no matter who the GM is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Not allowing Duquette to pursue the Toronto job that went to the Indians’ Mark Shapiro has generally been considered bush league by baseball executives. When a GM has a chance to improve his position, the common courtesy is to not stand in his way. Angelos, however, prevented it, and according to a major league source never compensated Duquette for the lost opportunity."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Not allowing Duquette to pursue the Toronto job that went to the Indians’ Mark Shapiro has generally been considered bush league by baseball executives. When a GM has a chance to improve his position, the common courtesy is to not stand in his way. Angelos, however, prevented it, and according to a major league source never compensated Duquette for the lost opportunity."

And when it is painfully obvious the other team, in this case a division rival, tampered with the GM? (btw Dan isn't a GM)

Dan was under contract and he most likely had prohibited communications with another team.

I don't see why he should be rewarded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And when it is painfully obvious the other team, in this case a division rival, tampered with the GM? (btw Dan isn't a GM)

Dan was under contract and he most likely had prohibited communications with another team.

I don't see why he should be rewarded.

Is it fair to say that the other 29 teams would of let Dan go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick Cafardo was also the source of the last story and I don't regard this as reporting anything new. I don't feel bad for Duquette at all, considering that Angelos ripped up his three-year deal after the 2012 season and extended him to 2018. Contracts are a two-way street. I'm not worried about "tensions," I'm worried because the O's are in a tenuous position with players leaving, a limited budget and a weak farm system. It's going to take an excellent offseason to get us back in contention in 2016. A lot of things will have to go right, no matter who the GM is.

He talked to DD in the article about Hunnington. If there weren't any issues then why didn DD refute them?

Buck is strong minded and it isn't suprising that he wouldn't see eye to eye with any GM. Regardless of whether Angelos should have let DD go or not if there is lingering resentment then that isn't healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it fair to say that the other 29 teams would of let Dan go?

Didn't he just win executive of the year? Didn't the Orioles just start winning once he got the job? Aren't the Blue Jays in same division? Didn't the news of Torontos interest break days before the winter meetings in a very sensitive time of the offseason? There are a lot of details that those with an agenda to make the O's look bad will just happen to look past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He talked to DD in the article about Hunnington. If there weren't any issues then why didn DD refute them?

Buck is strong minded and it isn't suprising that he wouldn't see eye to eye with any GM. Regardless of whether Angelos should have let DD go or not if there is lingering resentment then that isn't healthy.

I'm sick of that attitude. He signed a 6-year deal that Angelos didn't have to give him. I'm sure he's disappointed Angelos didn't let him go, but I don't consider it bush league for a team to hold a guy to a contract, especially when they already gave him a better deal once that provided tremendous long term security. Duquette should do his job professionally regardless of any disappointment on his part, and frankly, I think he has done that. I'm not one of those people who believes Dan would have done anything differently for the Orioles last winter if Toronto hadn't come knocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sick of that attitude. He signed a 6-year deal that Angelos didn't have to give him. I'm sure he's disappointed Angelos didn't let him go, but I don't consider it bush league for a team to hold a guy to a contract, especially when they already gave him a better deal once that provided tremendous long term security. Duquette should do his job professionally regardless of any disappointment on his part, and frankly, I think he has done that. I'm not one of those people who believes Dan would have done anything differently for the Orioles last winter if Toronto hadn't come knocking.

Of course ever word of this is true. Fact. Good logic and insight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sick of that attitude. He signed a 6-year deal that Angelos didn't have to give him. I'm sure he's disappointed Angelos didn't let him go, but I don't consider it bush league for a team to hold a guy to a contract, especially when they already gave him a better deal once that provided tremendous long term security. Duquette should do his job professionally regardless of any disappointment on his part, and frankly, I think he has done that. I'm not one of those people who believes Dan would have done anything differently for the Orioles last winter if Toronto hadn't come knocking.

What his attitude should or shouldn't be based on your opinion or mine isn't relevant. I am not accusing him of ditching his responsibilities but that doesn't mean everyone is happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What his attitude should or shouldn't be based on your opinion or mine isn't relevant. I am not accusing him of ditching his responsibilities but that doesn't mean everyone is happy.

It also does not mean that some hack from Boston knows better than Frobby does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls. The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...