Jump to content

Let me see if I understand our strategy correctly....


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

Is the hyperbole really necessary?

OP laid out some valid critiques of this organization based off of a long standing track record. I don't understand why people get so bent out of shape over people identifying this teams shortcomings. This team needs quality pitching - and in this climate you have to spend to get said pitching. Either that or develop it. The Orioles do neither. Now go ahead and point to Ubaldo as an example....

You have a good sense of humor, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Seems to me that if his post didn't bend you at least a bit out of shape then you wouldn't have interjected yourself into the discussion. ;)

Nope. Look at the statement made before getting bent out of shape. "I call things as I see them", which is what I was doing.

I also tend to agree with OP just a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of fixing our poor starting rotation (which will soon be even worse with Chen's departure):

Our "plan" is to simply hope that the pitchers we have will magically become better.

We're too cheap to sign quality free agent starters.

Our farm system hasn't produced any quality starters.

(We traded away decent starting prospects Arrieta, Hader, Davies).

So we'll simply hope what we have will be better! Love it!

Actually, it seems pretty obvious (to me) that the plan is to bolster the bullpen and make it as strong as possible so we can stop trying to get 6 innings out of pitchers who can only go five. That worked for the Royals last year, as their starters threw less innings than any other rotation in the league and yet they reached the playoffs. Given the price of free agent starting pitching and the number of holes to be filled, this seems like a reasonable approach this year. If Gausman continues to develop and Tillman returns to 2014 form, it just might work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of fixing our poor starting rotation (which will soon be even worse with Chen's departure):

Our "plan" is to simply hope that the pitchers we have will magically become better.

We're too cheap to sign quality free agent starters.

Our farm system hasn't produced any quality starters.

(We traded away decent starting prospects Arrieta, Hader, Davies).

So we'll simply hope what we have will be better! Love it!

So what exactly do you want them to do this winter? I think they will acquire someone to replace Chen -- the quality of that replacement remains to be seen. It could be someone on roughly Chen's level, it could be someone with upside but who is much more risky than Chen, or it could be a dumpster dive. Beyond that, yes, I think they are going to have to hope that as a group, Tillman, Gonzalez, Jimenez and Gausman perform significantly better than last year. And while there's no guarantee that it will happen, it wouldn't be a huge shock if it did happen. Stuff like that happens every single year in baseball, in both directions, better or worse with the same basic group of guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what exactly do you want them to do this winter? I think they will acquire someone to replace Chen -- the quality of that replacement remains to be seen. It could be someone on roughly Chen's level, it could be someone with upside but who is much more risky than Chen, or it could be a dumpster dive.

I can't speak for OP, but for me if the Orioles made the commitment necessary to acquire a comparable replacement to Chen that would quiet a lot of the "this team is cheap" crowd - including myself. If the O's can come away with a Kazmir or a Leake, or at least display a willingness to spend that kind of money, I think that would satisfy a lot of the detractors. If the Orioles come away with Vance Worley as the only potential addition to the rotation, I think a lot of people will be upset, and with good reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't speak for OP, but for me if the Orioles made the commitment necessary to acquire a comparable replacement to Chen that would quiet a lot of the "this team is cheap" crowd - including myself. If the O's can come away with a Kazmir or a Leake, or at least display a willingness to spend that kind of money, I think that would satisfy a lot of the detractors. If the Orioles come away with Vance Worley as the only potential addition to the rotation, I think a lot of people will be deservedly upset.

I disagree.

I'm not sure if a 200 million budget would be enough to quiet all the "this team is cheap" crowd. After-all the Dodgers spend more then that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't speak for OP, but for me if the Orioles made the commitment necessary to acquire a comparable replacement to Chen that would quiet a lot of the "this team is cheap" crowd - including myself. If the O's can come away with a Kazmir or a Leake, or at least display a willingness to spend that kind of money, I think that would satisfy a lot of the detractors. If the Orioles come away with Vance Worley as the only potential addition to the rotation, I think a lot of people will be upset, and with good reason.

I don't think attempting to quiet those who complain about how little money the Orioles spend should be part of the O's strategy. Just win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree.

I'm not sure if a 200 million budget would be enough to quiet all the "this team is cheap" crowd. After-all the Dodgers spend more then that.

Well, I guess I am speaking with reasonable people in mind. I don't believe the Orioles need to spend like the Dodgers -or even the Nationals - to be successful. I do get a little tired of them getting cheap in the starting pitching market with their self imposed mandates on contract length and unwillingness to pay the big dollars for guys who are worth it. The Orioles are never going to be an organization that are consistent players for the guys getting huge contracts, but you can't tell me we can't splurge every once in a while. Zimmerman's deal with the Tigers is something this team could have done, and he would have filled a huge need, and got a seemingly reasonable contract - why are the Orioles never players for guys like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think attempting to quiet those who complain about how little money the Orioles spend should be part of the O's strategy. Just win.

I agree with this statement.

If the Orioles would fix some of their organizational issues the complaints would cease, from rationale fans at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"That market's moving pretty quick," Duquette said. "The top end of the market, the prices are staggering, staggering. I don't know it sustains itself. We'll see. It tells me we need to develop Kevin Gausman and Mike Wright and Ty Wilson and do everything we can to help them become good major league pitchers."

And yes, to expect greatness from mediocrity is insanity. Case in point:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/n/norribu01.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...