Jump to content

Pressbox: Paul Folk - "Who fits?"


weams

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Who would be a better fit for the Orioles, Chris Davis, Yoenis Cespedes, or Justin Upton? <a href="https://twitter.com/PaulWFolk">@PaulWFolk</a> breaks it down. <a href="https://t.co/ZIqKLeABCA">https://t.co/ZIqKLeABCA</a></p>— PressBox (@PressBoxOnline) <a href="

">January 8, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The MLB free-agent market has been slow to develop, especially for position players, as the offseason drags into January. One big name came off the board when outfielder Alex Gordon re-signed with the Kansas City Royals Jan. 6, but three prominent sluggers -- first baseman Chris Davis and outfielders Yoenis Cespedes and Justin Upton -- remain available.

Davis' camp has been mostly quiet since he reportedly rejected a seven-year, $150 million offer from the Orioles in December. Cespedes and Upton, meanwhile, have reportedly been in contact with several teams but haven't found a suitable match. Some analysts have speculated that Cespedes and Upton are waiting to see where Davis lands, as they could be potential solutions for the Orioles if Davis signs elsewhere.

So let's imagine that the Orioles have the finances to sign one -- and only one -- of the three players. Which should they choose? Let's rank how Davis, Cespedes and Upton compare to each other in several categories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Who would be a better fit for the Orioles, Chris Davis, Yoenis Cespedes, or Justin Upton? <a href="https://twitter.com/PaulWFolk">@PaulWFolk</a> breaks it down. <a href="https://t.co/ZIqKLeABCA">https://t.co/ZIqKLeABCA</a></p>— PressBox (@PressBoxOnline) <a href="
">January 8, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Upton, Cespedes and then Davis. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upton, Cespedes and then Davis. IMO

Only if the Upton deal is a multi-year deal.

Trumbo plays first in 2016 and maybe Mancini or Walker gets some time and proves to be the first baseman starting in 2017. If not, maybe Trumbo can be signed to an extension. Since Mancini and Walker are closer to the majors than other position prospects, I'd rather let Davis walk and see if the O's can take care of 1B internally. First base is not currently a hole that needs to be filled.

Upton fills a hole in the lineup and shouldn't cost as much as Davis. With some of the money saved the O's could sign Alvarez to DH. He, Upton and Trumbo will supply more runs that Davis and whoever the O's put in the open outfield spot and whoever the DH is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Duquette on Sirus just echoed what Paul said. He says Davis is causing the log jam for Upton and Cespedes. He says the Orioles are the only team that has said they are willing to give at least a 5yr/100+ contract. Other teams are more in for a three year commitment.

So Upton and Cespedes have to wait around to see if Davis signs with Baltimore.

For me the priority is:

Davis because he is lefthanded and helps balance the O's lineup

Cespedes because he requires not draft choice

Upton is last because he requires a draft choice.

However none of them is a possibility. The O's need a starter. How that plays out may be more important then which bat they get. Especially with Pedro Alvarez and Trumbo being rough equal to what Davis and Paredes were last year.

Mancini may be the O's best position prospect that could be ready sometime in 2016 but there are two other players that are intriguing. Rickard as a leadoff hitter/right fielder and Dariel Alvarez in right. I am anxious to see how all three of those players perform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Duquette on Sirus just echoed what Paul said. He says Davis is causing the log jam for Upton and Cespedes. He says the Orioles are the only team that has said they are willing to give at least a 5yr/100+ contract. Other teams are more in for a three year commitment.

I don't see how it's possible that Justin Upton doesn't have bidders who are willing to go 5+ years. He'll be 29 years old next season. I find it pretty hard to believe with Cespedes, too. There has to be more to the story than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how it's possible that Justin Upton doesn't have bidders who are willing to go 5+ years. He'll be 29 years old next season. I find it pretty hard to believe with Cespedes, too. There has to be more to the story than that.

I think we have to consider that player salary inflation that has occurred with Greinke, Price and Heyward in late 2015 may have an affect on salary arbitration cases in early 2016. GMs have to wondering what the cost to their budget will be. For instance, Manny was projected to get 5.9m by MLBTR. Is that still valid or will it raise?

So as what has just happened to market prices sinks in to ball clubs executives they are being a little more caution on how they spend in the new year. Guys that wanted 5 years and over 100m may find that shorter contracts will be offered. JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have to consider that player salary inflation that has occurred with Greinke, Price and Heyward in late 2015 may have an affect on salary arbitration cases in early 2016. GMs have to wondering what the cost to their budget will be. For instance, Manny was projected to get 5.9m by MLBTR. Is that still valid or will it raise?

So as what has just happened to market prices sinks in to ball clubs executives they are being a little more caution on how they spend in the new year. Guys that wanted 5 years and over 100m may find that shorter contracts will be offered. JMO

As I understand it, free agent signings are not a basis for arbitration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how it's possible that Justin Upton doesn't have bidders who are willing to go 5+ years. He'll be 29 years old next season. I find it pretty hard to believe with Cespedes, too. There has to be more to the story than that.

It's a question of demand. What teams really need an OF enough to pay 5/100M +? Maybe DET. Not LAA, STL, TEX, CHW, was, or SF.Who else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only if the Upton deal is a multi-year deal.

Trumbo plays first in 2016 and maybe Mancini or Walker gets some time and proves to be the first baseman starting in 2017. If not, maybe Trumbo can be signed to an extension. Since Mancini and Walker are closer to the majors than other position prospects, I'd rather let Davis walk and see if the O's can take care of 1B internally. First base is not currently a hole that needs to be filled.

Upton fills a hole in the lineup and shouldn't cost as much as Davis. With some of the money saved the O's could sign Alvarez to DH. He, Upton and Trumbo will supply more runs that Davis and whoever the O's put in the open outfield spot and whoever the DH is.

This would be my preference as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upton is not going to sign a one-year deal. Fantasy land. He won't miraculously fall into our laps...

We either sign Davis and a retread pitcher to complete with the great Vanimal or we get Pedro Alvarez and a starter (Doug Fister comes to mind).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upton is not going to sign a one-year deal. Fantasy land. He won't miraculously fall into our laps...

We either sign Davis and a retread pitcher to complete with the great Vanimal or we get Pedro Alvarez and a starter (Doug Fister comes to mind).

I agree. Upton will not sign a one year deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upton is not going to sign a one-year deal. Fantasy land. He won't miraculously fall into our laps...

We either sign Davis and a retread pitcher to complete with the great Vanimal or we get Pedro Alvarez and a starter (Doug Fister comes to mind).

Davis and a retread will cost much more than Alvarez and Fister, so I don't see this as an either/or

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...