Jump to content

The Case for P. Alvarez


CaptainRedbeard

Recommended Posts

All I can say about Pedro Alvarez is this: IMO, he is the highest upside guy on the market. I think in OPACY and the AL east he is a monster power hitter that could be signed for a very reasonable deal (3/20-21). And there is no compensation tied to him. If I were the Orioles, I would be thinking hard about putting Trumbo in RF and signing Alvarez to DH. Trumbo does have a RF arm, not great but better than Fowler or Kim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply
All I can say about Pedro Alvarez is this: IMO, he is the highest upside guy on the market. I think in OPACY and the AL east he is a monster power hitter that could be signed for a very reasonable deal (3/20-21). And there is no compensation tied to him. If I were the Orioles, I would be thinking hard about putting Trumbo in RF and signing Alvarez to DH. Trumbo does have a RF arm, not great but better than Fowler or Kim.

I would enjoy watching this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do. I do dig the long ball. That's where we play. That's who we are. That's where we come from.

Lol, and Earl also dug the long ball. Pitching, defense and the 3 run HR. We have the defense, adding Alvarez puts us over the top on the long ball. Can we get the pitching? These guys are not Palmer, McNally, Cuellar and company are they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I can say about Pedro Alvarez is this: IMO, he is the highest upside guy on the market. I think in OPACY and the AL east he is a monster power hitter that could be signed for a very reasonable deal (3/20-21). And there is no compensation tied to him. If I were the Orioles, I would be thinking hard about putting Trumbo in RF and signing Alvarez to DH. Trumbo does have a RF arm, not great but better than Fowler or Kim.

I've been down with this idea for a while. I would be very happy with that lineup, even accepting Trumbo in right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I can say about Pedro Alvarez is this: IMO, he is the highest upside guy on the market. I think in OPACY and the AL east he is a monster power hitter that could be signed for a very reasonable deal (3/20-21). And there is no compensation tied to him. If I were the Orioles, I would be thinking hard about putting Trumbo in RF and signing Alvarez to DH. Trumbo does have a RF arm, not great but better than Fowler or Kim.

3/21!? Alvarez is going to be lucky if he can do better than 1/5 right now. The Pirates non-tendered him at a projected $8.1MM salary. I do think he's by far the highest upside guy on the market, but part of his appeal is that he has no suitors so he could be had for a below-market deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if Heyman is completely making it up, it's good he's reporting interest in Alvarez because it helps our case with Fowler.

I'm starting to think that we are the only team Boras could even come to for Alvarez. Let's ignore the NL teams for now, since he's such a bad 1B he'd likely only be a pinch hitter for them. To get playing time, he'd need to go to an AL team with a DH with position flexibility to play the OF/1B. Let's look at that team by team:

BOS: Papi. No fit.

NYY: A-Rod. Teixeira at 1B. No fit.

TB: Morrison/Pearce/Dickerson. Very crowded. No real fit, but perhaps some weaker competition.

TOR: Encarnacion. Unless they're down on Smoak and are ok with Encarnacion/Alvarez playing 1B, looks like another no fit.

DET: Martinez. No fit.

KC: Morales. No fit.

CLE: Santana. Napoli signed to be everyday 1B. Just signed Uribe. Looks like another no fit.

MIN: Park. Could play 1B, but Mauer entrenched there. No fit.

CHW: Laroche/Abreu. No fit.

SEA: Cruz. Could play the OF in a pinch, but he's another year older and they want to keep him healthy. Similar to the BAL situation, but likely worse.

LAA: Pujols/Cron. Big hole in LF - maybe Cron could do a Trumbo impression out there? He has no ML experience in the OF. Still a tough fit.

OAK: Butler. Haha.

TEX: Moreland/Fielder. Similar to LAA with a potentially big hole in LF if Hamilton is hurt, but no indication that Moreland could cut it out there. Unlikely fit.

HOU: Gattis. He's played some bad OF but he's had some injury issues and they want him at DH. Singleton is far from a sure thing at 1B. But, they already dumped Carter early in the offseason. Unlikely fit.

To me, it looks like the Orioles have easily the most position flexibility between their DH/1B pairs. Davis and Trumbo may be bad OFers, but at least they've spent some time out there. As far as I can tell, Boras/Alvarez may be best off coming to us to find playing time, even if he's not guaranteed it. They're more likely to play the "waiting for an injury game" but that's a risky proposition IMO.

The Yankees lost Greg Bird for the year. They could use Alvarez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would consider Alvarez even after we get Fowler. There is room on the 25 man. Just no Rickard. It looks like DD is trying to correct the problems of last year. Which were the lack of SP depth and the corner bat we were searching for all year. It would be an insurance plan if a corner guy went down. Reimold, Fowler and Trumbo have all had some injury problems before. I'd be surprised if it happened but then again I never expected us to bring back O'day, CD and sign Gallardo and Fowler(probably).

Our AAA depth is looking pretty solid right now.

SP's-Despaigner, Worley, Wright, Wilson, Jones, Mac

RP's- Drake, Mac, all the above arms

OF-Alvarez, Urrutia, Hoes, Avery, Navarro, Terdaslavich

IF- Janish and Tolleson

1B- Walker, Mancini, Terdaslavich

C: Pena

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Yankees lost Greg Bird for the year. They could use Alvarez.

Greg Bird wasn't in line to get much playing time with them anyway, unless he was playing OF (which Alvarez can't do). Teixeira can only play 1B. A-Rod can't play anywhere. Alvarez could back up both of them but there'd be no playing time for him while both of the veterans are healthy. He has a better chance to get playing time with the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greg Bird wasn't in line to get much playing time with them anyway, unless he was playing OF (which Alvarez can't do). Teixeira can only play 1B. A-Rod can't play anywhere. Alvarez could back up both of them but there'd be no playing time for him while both of the veterans are healthy. He has a better chance to get playing time with the Orioles.

Yankees also just signed Chris Parmelee to a MiLB deal (about 20 min ago). He'd be a better fit than Alvarez to fill the Greg Bird role because he can actually play some OF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yankees also just signed Chris Parmelee to a MiLB deal (about 20 min ago). He'd be a better fit than Alvarez to fill the Greg Bird role because he can actually play some OF.

Bird was strictly a first baseman, so not sure of your point. Plus, Alvarez is much better than Parmalee, who will likely be in AAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bird was strictly a first baseman, so not sure of your point. Plus, Alvarez is much better than Parmalee, who will likely be in AAA.

My mistake. I thought there was some talk of him getting time in the OF but that was just speculation. But it looks like the Yankees' plan was to have Bird in AAA, so they may not want to have Alvarez on the major league roster.

"The expectation was that [bird] would be at Triple-A in the event we had a problem," Cashman said. "We've lost an important piece that benefited us greatly last year when Tex went down...Obviously we're down a big insurance piece for 2016."

http://m.mlb.com/news/article/163380482/yankees-greg-bird-to-miss-season-with-injury

As far as I can tell, their bench is Dustin Ackley, Aaron Hicks, Gary Sanchez, and likely MI to backup Gregorious at SS (probably Kozma). Perhaps if they're comfortable with Ackley backing up Castro at 2B and Castro backing up SS, they could squeeze Alvarez into that last spot, but they're likely better off having a true utility infielder on the bench.

I'm aware Alvarez is better than Parmelee, but my point was more that Parmelee isn't confined to just DH, and that may be better suited for their bench given that neither Teixeira or A-Rod can play the OF. It doesn't appear like that's the case though, Bird was never going to be on the bench and play some OF, so Parmelee is just serving as the minor league depth to replace Bird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...