Jump to content

Clubhouse Chemistry


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

Especially after some very frustrating losses. Compare them to the Nats tonight: 9th inning at home, down by only one run, with the Mets having already lost--nonetheless, somehow you could feel that they had no life left in them. (Although I guess O'Day had something to do with that.)

I'm just now watching the replay. In the 3rd or 4th inning Harper hit a sharp bouncer to JJ. He fields it easily and takes a stutter step. Then he takes another stutter step. I'm like wth is he doing? An easy throw to Crush and then you see Harper. BARELY jogging to 1st. It was pathetic!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm just now watching the replay. In the 3rd or 4th inning Harper hit a sharp bouncer to JJ. He fields it easily and takes a stutter step. Then he takes another stutter step. I'm like wth is he doing? An easy throw to Crush and then you see Harper. BARELY jogging to 1st. It was pathetic!

Unlike how Crush, Adam, Reimold, Paredes, Parra, et al run their grounders out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just now watching the replay. In the 3rd or 4th inning Harper hit a sharp bouncer to JJ. He fields it easily and takes a stutter step. Then he takes another stutter step. I'm like wth is he doing? An easy throw to Crush and then you see Harper. BARELY jogging to 1st. It was pathetic!

Tea, Scott. You forgot to mention the tea.

In addition to the 2 stutter steps, Hardy also had a cup of caffeine-free tea with lemon and honey.

THEN, he fired the ball to Davis at 1st base to beat Harper by about 6 steps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tea, Scott. You forgot to mention the tea.

In addition to the 2 stutter steps, Hardy also had a cup of caffeine-free tea with lemon and honey.

THEN, he fired the ball to Davis at 1st base to beat Harper by about 6 steps.

Seriously, it's like it surprised JJ how lazy a player could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the team misses the playoffs, it would be nice to see them keep the streak of winning seasons alive. The Orioles had such a streak from 1968 to 1985, which is absurd. I don't remember any of them.

Yep. Even if the playoffs are a longshot, I would at least like to see the team finish over .500.

Also, while the playoffs may be a longshot, the only way that longshot has an even remote chance of coming through is if we keep winning. So here's to the birds keeping on keeping on! :beerchug1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ma----o

It's a thing people do

Except there's no "M" in front of Andino

We dubbed him the Mandino for being such a Red Sox Killer. I remember the Boston announcers admitting how dangerous he was everytime he came to the plate with runners on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there was one team ahead of us I might hold out hope. We have to jump 3 teams.

But... none of the 3 teams play each other the rest of the way.

Yesterday we had to jump 4 teams. And two of the four played each other 6 times remaining. Which made things a lot more problematic for us because there were 6 times when a team ahead of us was guaranteed to win.

So the outlook is a lot sunnier today. I'll bet that 0.4% playoff odds someone quoted a while back has skyrocketed up to 0.9% or maybe even 1.5% by now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...