Jump to content

What is the next move to find the hitter we thought we had?


oriolediehard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm sorry, but why would the Orioles even consider this?
I'm saying what the O's would consider, I am saying what CIN would probably want. Didn't they ask for Gausman earlier? Everybody does. We aren't getting Bruce for some one we might DFA or a prospect who doesn't fill a need.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CIN would have little interest in Walker they are set at 1B for a while. The might like Reyes or Sisco and Wright/Wilson.

I have a feeling the front office wants to hold onto Sisco. Maybe not long term but for another season at least. If this kid has the same production this year between AA and AAA his value will be through the roof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their back up plan to losing Fowler all along was Jay Bruce. Something will get done within the week.

Most will disagree but after losing out on Fowler, Bruce was my #2 choice. He could hit 40 over the left field wall, he's a decent RF and he's coming to a team that will contend that will motivate him. Plus, he has an option for 2017 IF he does well and we want to hold on to him after next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm saying what the O's would consider, I am saying what CIN would probably want. Didn't they ask for Gausman earlier? Everybody does. We aren't getting Bruce for some one we might DFA or a prospect who doesn't fill a need.

Bruce is not that great, gets paid a decent amount and he's on a rebuilding team. I think you offer a less than stellar prospect and be done with it. No way does Reyes or Sisco enter the mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he doesn't want to play Davis in RF, then why does anybody think he'd ever play Trumbo in RF, considering that Davis is a better outfielder than Trumbo?
What evidence do you have for that? CD has had very few IN in the OF. Not enough to make any determination about his defense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he doesn't want to play Davis in RF, then why does anybody think he'd ever play Trumbo in RF, considering that Davis is a better outfielder than Trumbo?

David wants to play 1B and that is the main difference between the two. He seems to have an understanding with Buck, a big new contract, and Trumbo is just happy to fit in and wants AB in his contract year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...