Jump to content

The Trumbo/Davis RF situation....


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

And it's this. All the people confused about Davis and his ability to play the OF at anything but a below average level need to reassess. He isn't that much better than Trumbo out there.

It is really simple. If he was a good right fielder he never would have ended up at first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It is really simple. If he was a good right fielder he never would have ended up at first.

Heck, you know I don't think he'll be worth what they're paying him if he plays every game at 1B. If he suddenly turned into David Ortiz (except for the year when he couldn't see) on the back end of the deal I suppose it would mitigate some of my angst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck, you know I don't think he'll be worth what they're paying him if he plays every game at 1B. If he suddenly turned into David Ortiz (except for the year when he couldn't see) on the back end of the deal I suppose it would mitigate some of my angst.

That is close to a best case scenario in my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Davis worth his contract as a RF? Do you pay 23m for a right fielder who had below average defensive skills?

No one is talking about this being a permanent move. Trumbo and Alvarez are signed for just this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is talking about this being a permanent move. Trumbo and Alvarez are signed for just this year.

Pretty lousy planning to take your best player on a new contract in his prime and play him out of position because you signed 2 DHs and no COF

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty lousy planning to take your best player on a new contract in his prime and play him out of position because you signed 2 DHs and no COF

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We signed Machado on a new contract?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty lousy planning to take your best player on a new contract in his prime and play him out of position because you signed 2 DHs and no COF

We signed Machado to a new contract?

Yes.

And he is also being converted to an outfielder to play alongside Adam Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty lousy planning to take your best player on a new contract in his prime and play him out of position because you signed 2 DHs and no COF

We signed Machado to a new contract?

Yes.

And he is also being converted to an outfielder to play alongside Adam Jones.

We know he has the arm for right field.

I'm worried about all the running with those knees though. Will they have to be drained daily?

He can always get a pair of artificial Joe Namath knees.

Whatever it takes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My view is Buck will give Trumbo every opportunity to hold down the job in Right. That is clearly the #1 option. However, if 6 weeks into the season, he is clearly hurting the team in the OF, buck will sit down with Davis and get him to buy in to playing the OF. That's one thing that makes Buck such a good manager is his ability to communicate with the team.

If the team is hurting with Trumbo in RF I don't know why people think Buck will have to convince Davis. Davis is here for 6 years, he has a vested interest in winning, he's moved around for Buck before. Hell, he offered to pitch for Buck. He won't need to be convinced. He will just do it and it may be his idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the team is hurting with Trumbo in RF I don't know why people think Buck will have to convince Davis. Davis is here for 6 years, he has a vested interest in winning, he's moved around for Buck before. Hell, he offered to pitch for Buck. He won't need to be convinced. He will just do it and it may be his idea.

Exactly.

Buck wants to win.

This team wants to win.

Remember their next man up mentality, this is a blue collar team, that will do what it needs to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...