Jump to content

Turning point of the spring for the O's.


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Perspective:

The Almighty Cubs are 1-6 and are losing today. Fowler is batting .100.

Yankees have won only 2.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yankees lost Monday and Tuesday, 1-0 in both games. Bats come around, but having your pitchers show up is important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The

And today we lose to a SS Phillies team, with about 1/2 of our regulars in the lineup and dominated by Phillies farmhands.

No way that a nine game losing streak isn't an indicator of the state of the team

At the very least we can see that our high level prospects are inferior, which I think most realize

and it's not just losing it's getting blown out of almost every game this spring

This team can't get on base, can't run the bases, can't catch a fly ball, and can't put pressure on the other teams defense because of what I expect will be the lowest number of balls in play

in the majors.

Yeah, we will probably go 0-162, or 0-1000 if you count our farm teams.

Let me ask you: do you believe our offense will be above average, average, or below average when it comes to scoring runs? And how important are 10 spring training games in making this assessment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The turning point of the spring is April 4, when the games count. For me, the big takeaway from the last two days is Ubaldo and Gonzo pitched well and erased any big concerns about their rough first outings. Nothing else meant anything to me. I'd like to start winning some games just because I prefer to read about winning, but it's just not important.

Losing a few games because you are pitching the Jeff Beliveau's and batting the Audry Perez's of the world is one thing. Watching your projected starters get beat up on most days, your projected starters in the field not hit, and generally get beat down each and every day without tasting any semblance of winning is not a good idea if you ask me. At best our backups are getting beat by their back ups but at worse this team is showing some warts already.

I don't want to be reactionary but going 0-9-1 to start the spring is ridiculous. I can't think of one good news story so far this spring, but losing tends to be contagious. When the Orioles play well in the spring of late they play well during the season. Last year they were bad in the spring and they started off 15-19. If I'm Buck, I putting my starters out there and I'm pitching my A guys to get off this snide. I realize no one will care about this spring if the Orioles start winning on April 4th, but almost every concern we had coming into this season have been highlighted so far this spring.

At this point I just hope they can win a game before I go down there next week. I don't care how many sound bites you hear about no one caring who wins of loses in spring training. What I see are lot of poor starting pitching performances, stars that are not hitting at all, and a team that has shown no fight. There is no other way to spin this spring as anything other than brutal so far even you don't care about wins and losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The

Yeah, we will probably go 0-162, or 0-1000 if you count our farm teams.

Let me ask you: do you believe our offense will be above average, average, or below average when it comes to scoring runs? And how important are 10 spring training games in making this assessment?

I believe the team will be average in scoring runs but with a bad balance, the occasional double digit runs game with 5-7 game stretches

of scoring 3 or less. Good pitching (like that of the contenders) will completely shut this team down, and they will occcasionaly

take bad pitching to the woodshed. I'm not sure how you spend 200+ million dollars to assemble a team this bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And today we lose to a SS Phillies team, with about 1/2 of our regulars in the lineup and dominated by Phillies farmhands.

No way that a nine game losing streak isn't an indicator of the state of the team

At the very least we can see that our high level prospects are inferior, which I think most realize

and it's not just losing it's getting blown out of almost every game this spring

This team can't get on base, can't run the bases, can't catch a fly ball, and can't put pressure on the other teams defense because of what I expect will be the lowest number of balls in play

in the majors.

:laughlol:

Thank you Lord for the patience you have blessed me with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they can and will improve over the course of the season, but there's little doubt that they have played rather poorly in the first 10 games of the season, as a team.

I just hope that by the last week of spring training they'll start getting it into their heads that it's important to win games instead of just feeling like they're out there to have fun and get some good swings in. A team without a passion to win ends up sub-.500 for the season.

I'm mildly concerned with the offense. The few times so far we've had our BIG offense playing they aren't hitting and scoring. But 26 days til OD. Plenty of ticktockticktock time left.

BTW, Chris Davis asked to go on today's (yesterday's...) road trip. Wanted more ABs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the team will be average in scoring runs but with a bad balance, the occasional double digit runs game with 5-7 game stretches

of scoring 3 or less. Good pitching (like that of the contenders) will completely shut this team down, and they will occcasionaly

take bad pitching to the woodshed. I'm not sure how you spend 200+ million dollars to assemble a team this bad.

I agree. Last year the team scored a lot of runs, but they scored fewer than 2 in 40 or so IIRC. It is tough for any pitcher to win with that type of support. Sometimes a little off field single that other teams give rather than going for the bomb. This team is also SLOW, but I hope smart base runners. Some pretty slow players like Cruz a couple years ago took the extra base by reading the ball off the bat well and hustling. He did get caught a couple of times, but overall it was a plus. I like low scoring games where players take what the other team gives you and can find other ways to win. IMO this team is too one dimensional offensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...