Jump to content

Joey Rickard is the real deal


Diehard_O's_Fan

Recommended Posts

He's 1.5 runs better than average with the bat, appears 2.3 runs below average with the glove (relative to an average defender at an average position), tiny fractions of a run one way or the other in positional adjustment and baserunning and league strength, and 1.7 runs to the positive to convert average to replacement, all in a sampling of PAs and defensive innings a tiny fraction of what's necessary to draw any conclusions.
Enough said.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply
What do people mean when they say bad routes? The player runs around constantly changing direction? He runs straight to where he thinks the ball is going only to find it isn't there? He should take an arch to the ball just to be safe? I don't see Joey doing any of these things.

The other night he had a false step backwards before running in, diving and missing a ball he should have caught. Bad jump, bad route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must you?

Must I what, trample on your daises?

There is no logical reason to expect someone his age to improve on defense.

You think he didn't know all along that his glove would be his ticket to the majors?

You think the Rays can't or don't want to emphasis outfield defense?

Defense peaks earliest of all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bad read, late jump maybe, but not a poor route IMO.

I agree with you on the read and late jump. But will add if the player's route on a fly ball that's going to land 30 feet in front of him involves going backwards, I'd say it's a bad route.

I think he does look a little hesitant at times, but he's fast enough and athletic enough to be an above average OF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had four seasons in the Rays system to get better. You think the O's have better instructors?

Real life is a great instructor. The kid hasn't even filled out yet, for Buck's sake. With his natural speed, he could surely be a nice defensive asset someday, no Pearce mind you, but a real asset. :rolleyestf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like his determination and he's been better than we thought. I don't think he's a long term solution though. He can hit. But he can't really throw, defend, walk or hit for power. He's kind of a one dimensional player.

Didn't he have a pretty good throw towards the end of the game last night? I thought it wasn't decent throw home, good arm accurate enough to get the job done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My comment was that "I think" he has "a chance" to improve. It's just my opinion. I don't really feel the need to back up my little cursory opinion with hard facts or historical evidence. By all account, you're right, I'm sure.

We have a pretty small ML sample of Rickard playing LF and CF. He's been decent - I think he's a bit better in CF, but again, that's just my eyeballs. I think as he gets comfortable in the big leagues and in LF, he could get better.

Certainly we've seen Chris Davis get better at 1B. He spent a million years in the minors also.

Actually you said "a lot" better. Small improvements are a lot more likely than large ones.

I would expect increased familiarity with ballparks and competition would lead to a small improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you on the read and late jump. But will add if the player's route on a fly ball that's going to land 30 feet in front of him involves going backwards, I'd say it's a bad route.

I think he does look a little hesitant at times, but he's fast enough and athletic enough to be an above average OF.

Did you ever play the OF?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After Jimmy Paredes straight up raked for 1/3 of last season before looking like he was swinging a dead fish for the last three months of the season, I'm not going to make any major assessments of Rickard's long-term ability at the plate. He's hot right now and there is probably not much of a book on him. He's taking advantage of it and helping us win games in the present, so I'll ride that train while he's rolling. He's only drawn two walks, but he has shown a good eye at the plate and worked pitchers deep into counts.

Defensively, you can't teach speed or hustle and he certainly has both. He's probably relied on his speed too often throughout his career as an outfielder and that's hurt his development in reading balls off the bat. At worst, he's the outfield equivalent to Flaherty and I'm satisfied with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I also went with Burnes because of his better durability. Since 2019 Snell has pitched more then 128 innings in a season one time (180 innings in 2023). While Burnes has pitched over 167 inning or more every season since becoming a full time starter in 2021. Burnes is also two years younger so in theory while a six year contract is riskier it would end at the same age as Snell on a four year deal. I'd be happy with either one, but my preference in Burnes.
    • Adding that I would go for Roki over either of them.
    • I'd go for Snell. He has true Cy Young stuff. Burnes is really good but his K rate keeps dropping and the years scare me. The box score for his playoff start was solid but he actually gave up a lot of hard contact. I just don't trust him enough to commit all those years and dollars.
    • I go Burnes because to me the higher floor is very important with this sort of deal. I feel like Snell's skillset is more on a razor's edge-- if you didn't like how Burnes pitched in August, Snell is almost certainly more prone to stretches of poor performance like that. Even if he is more dominant at other times to balance it out. Plus, the extra length of Burnes' deal is offset a bit by being 2 years younger. 
    • Snell is injury prone and Burnes is a tough workhorse.
    • Didn't see the video? The ball went maybe 15 feet before it bounced, it was rolling by the dugout.  It was nothing and the Dodgers look soft. Was he supposed to let the discarded ball stay on the field?
    • Rojas pulled from the bases in the 3rd inning after he couldn't manage 2nd to home on a Mookie single (and Ohtani couldn't 1st to 3rd behind him) as the Dodgers try to dig out of 6-1.    Rojas' limited mobility hurt the Dodgers defense on a Bogaerts ground ball where Merrill was too quick going first to second, and Rojas ended up getting no outs on a routine ground ball. Manny with a cagey zigzag baserunning move during the Padres 6-run inning off Buehler, getting into Freeman's throwing lane to put Buehler into the jam. Teoscar grand slam brings it back to 6-5 in the 3rd inning...get your popcorn ready.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...