Jump to content

anyone else not sold on Sherrill as closer?


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 201
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I doubt he'll become a lights out, AS-caliber closer. But he'll be good enough to be a decent closer. Its really no different than being any other sort of reliever except for a very small percentage of players who can't handle it.

I still think we should look into moving him if he racks up a bunch of saves. Increase his value then sell high. I'd probably wait until the offseason rather than this July.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His propensity for giving up the HR does worry me (.30 GB/FB ratio), but he's been successful this year and has a decent track record going back to 2004. I don't think he's someone we should target as a closer for 2009 though. His value will be peaking come July 31st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he'll be one of the top closers by the end of the year and I think his ERA will drop in the 2.50 - 3.00 range. He might not be overpowering but his deceptive delivery and his poise make him a good closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at ERA for a closer with limited innings pitched this early in the season just isn't a good way to judge his performance. One bad outing can grossly inflate an ERA. He could be lights out in 10 of 11 performances and that one bad inning can kill an ERA. I'll take what he's given us any time and feel very confident when he comes into a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sherrill is definitely a fly ball pitcher, which is going to be a problem for him going forward as he ages. And take a look at how it's gotten worse the last 4 years

2005: 18/18 GB/FB (1.00)

2006: 29/49 (0.59)

2007: 26/56 (0.46)

2008: 6/20 (0.30)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Chris Ray is looking good late this summer and McCrory is showing promise, I'd see what's out there. But I wouldn't trade him just to trade him.I'd want quality-targeted quality back.

Frankly, Sherrill might have a better future as a setup man to Ray/McCrory. That mite be a hack of a bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One good month and we have people here already losing sight of what this year's about. Worry about Markakis, Jones and the young pitching. Sherrill is fine as closer for now and he may end up overvalued by the trade deadline as desperate as some of these clubs are for relief help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sherrill is definitely a fly ball pitcher, which is going to be a problem for him going forward as he ages. And take a look at how it's gotten worse the last 4 years

2005: 18/18 GB/FB (1.00)

2006: 29/49 (0.59)

2007: 26/56 (0.46)

2008: 6/20 (0.30)

Another thing you have to look at though is that a fly ball is any ball hit in the air. So many, not all, of his fly outs over the past couple of years are indeed pop ups to the infield or catcher. That is one thing to remember -- even a foul out to the catcher is a fly out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There's a lot to like in the minors but if this guy reaches his potential it'll have a huge impact.  
    • Burnes has two years of control left and he will have banked over $15 million dollars in his career by the end of year 1, so he may not be interested in forgoing his first trip into free agency to sign an extension with us. There is simply no way I am trading 6 years of Grayson for 2 years of Burnes, or virtually anyone else for that matter. He is the best pitching prospect in baseball and looks every bit the part of a future rotation anchor for the Orioles.  Cowser, OTOH, I can probably be talked into if other significant moves are going to be made in conjunction with such a trade, but I believe that Elias values 6 years of Cowser (plus the rest of the necessary trade package) higher than he would 2 years of Burnes. You are speaking with the benefit of hindsight and you are discounting just how abnormal (perhaps even unnatural, you might say) his performance was during that 4 year contract. Baseball players generally do not peak in their late 30s, especially injury-prone DH types. There was virtually no reason to expect that outcome and I am not going to criticize the Orioles for not accurately predicting a genuine black swan event.
    • I can see him move guys from the upper-level infield surplus. But I, too, am skeptical he'll trade any higher-level pitchers. Honestly, I doubt he trades much from the pipeline outside of what has proven to be a surplus at the higher-levels. Essentially, with Mateo, Urias, Ortiz, Norby, and Westburg, we have five players for 2 (maybe 3) spots. He'll obviously prefer to move Mateo and Urias as they're the older players, but I could see a couple of the Norby, Westburg, Ortiz (and we can throw Hernaiz in there, too). Given Henderson has arrived, there's some depth in the aforementioned group, plus guys like Holliday, Wagner, Bencosme, etc are just a couple years behind.  
    • I'm a little concerned about this too. As we've discussed before, there's a serious log jam on the horizon. Middle infield and potentially outfield. Gonna have to move some players. The trick of it I suppose, is knowing which ones to move. Elias should have the advantage of being more familiar with his own players than potential suitors would be... but that only gets you so far... you have to move highly regarded players before you get a chance to fully assess their MLB performance... or you run the risk of tipping your hand (exposing players as less or more capable at the MLB level) Elias has the luxury of having both MLB and MiLB resources he can move today... Say for examples Hays, or Mullins... or Mateo and Urias...   that though, only begins to clean up the impending logjam. If you wait too long, you're stuck with a bunch of players you HAVE to unload.. and then you get fleeced
    • Collecting HBP is largely a repeatable "skill."
    • The PFF grade is because they charged the receivers with 5 drops (Kenyan Drake and Duvernay both dropped screen passes that hit them on the chest, and the other 3 were Andrews, Oliver and Robinson.) It looks like they marked him for 3 throwaways too, so he was 21 for 29 in terms of adjusted completion.   I hard disagree on the jump balls, at least this game.  Both jump balls to Andrews and Oliver were more on the receivers, Andrews' ball especially.  That ball was exactly where it needed to be.  When you have a 6'5" superstar tight end that requires a defensive back in coverage, I think it's almost always the right play to throw it over the head of his defenders so no one else can catch it.  Andrews didn't have to reach for it, it just clanked off his fingers.  And I think Oliver's ball was like 2 inches higher than maybe he would have liked, but I'm not really calling that a miss anymore because Oliver slowed down for no reason, and he mistimed his jump.  He 100% should have caught that.
    • The greatest I ever saw at getting hit by pitches was Ernie Pantusso.  You could not miss him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...