Jump to content

General MLB Draft Thread - Rounds 1-4


markpolis

Recommended Posts

Guys, I got this off another site. Looks a little better::002_scool:

4th round pick, Tim Bascom, RHP out of UCF - tore his ACL after being drafted in the 6th by the Padres last year, and has returned to the mound for an independent league.

"Bascom, the ace of Bradenton's staff, wowed scouts and fans early this year with a mid 90's fast ball. Virtually untouchable for the Juice, he posted a 0.00 ERA over 10 innings of work. Opponents hit a lowly .094 against him, including 11 strike outs.

A three-year starter at the University of Central Florida, Bascom compiled a 19-11 record with the Golden Knights and was a two time conference All-Star. Bascom was taken by the Padres in the 6th round of the 2006 amateur draft, but failed a physical, thus putting his big league dreams on hold. He is eligible to be drafted again later this week and hopes to make an impact in 2007 and beyond."

Well that certainly makes him sound a lot better than a fingy-stuff signable guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 306
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Whew! That pick took me awhile to recover from.

Here's some more picks:

130 - Nats - Derek Norris, HS, C,

131 - Brewers - Eric Farris, Loyola, 2B.

132 - Rockies - Isiah Froneberger, HS, LHP

133 - D-Backs - Sean Morgan, Tulane, RHP.

134 - Padres - Corey Kluber, Stenson, RHP

135 - Mariners - Nolan Gallagher - Stanford U, RHP

136 - Bryan Peterson, UC Irvine, RF

137 - Indians - Tim McFarland, HS, LHP

138 - Braves - Cory Gearrin, Mercer, RHP

139 - Reds - Blake Stouffer, Texas A&M, 1B

140 - Rangers - Garrett Nash - Utah HS, CF

Nash came into the draft season with high expectations and has had difficulty living up to them. He's a switch-hitter who'll have to play second or the outfield at the next level and he hasn't swung the bat well enough this season. Still, he's got as much speed as anyone in the draft class, a tool that's sure to intrigue some, though it seems more likely that he'll head to Oregon State.

141 - Brett Elbner, HS, RHP

142 - Cardinals - Kyle Russell, Texas, RF, LL

Russell certainly made a splash this season by obliterating the school record for home runs in a season. The power is legit, but there is concern about his ability to make contact consistently enough for the power to come into play at the next level. The power with the arm strength, though, does fit the right-field profile in the future. A draft-eligible sophomore, he does hold some leverage in terms of returning for his junior season at Texas.

143 - Phillies - Tyler Mach, Ok. St., 2B, R/R

144 - Red Sox - Chris Province - SE Louisana U, RHP

145 - Blue Jays - Brad Mills - U of Arizona, LHP

Mills was a 22nd round draft pick by the Toronto Blue Jays a year ago, but turned down their offer to return for a senior season. He has the chance to be a starter with an average fastball and above-average curve and changeup. He'd be considered much more highly if he had exhibited more consistent fastball command. At the very least, he could be an effective lefty bullpen type.

1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Bascom, the ace of Bradenton's staff, wowed scouts and fans early this year with a mid 90's fast ball. Virtually untouchable for the Juice, he posted a 0.00 ERA over 10 innings of work.

i have to laugh at this - does Bradenton play 8 ballgames a year? gimme a break. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Agreed, but it just seems a little more pronounced with Jorge.
    • That can be said about most hitters in the major leagues. 
    • If you execute your slider, you are in good shape against Mateo. If you hang your slider, RIP.
    • Yes - see Tony’s top 75 prospect ratings for last offseason. Miguel was ranked 35th. Strong defensive catcher with plus contact skills. Power was absent last year but emerged yesterday. I’d expect he’ll be top 15 by end of year. 
    • Baseball will change, there's almost no doubt about that. But it's very unlikely to change back to the ways of 50 or 100 years ago because there's no competitive advantage to do so. It will probably change in ways that we don't fully expect, and that haven't happened before. Unless the powers-that-be change the rules and conditions, which they've always been very reluctant to do, the strategies of today are the strategies of today because they win a lot more games than the strategies of 1970. I think it's more likely that we see individual pitchers pitch even less in each outing (although possibly more frequently) than it is we go back to complete games. Even if the rules are changed, say you can only have nine pitchers on the roster like was common 50 years ago, today's GMs and managers would just use each pitcher for three innings every three games instead of a four-man rotation with lots of complete games.
    • I try to not get too caught up in Mateo but I have to be honest. Watching him in person is just a treat. Love that he is playing so well and continue to be happy he is still an Oriole. 
    • Isn't is just weird that it took 100+ years to figure that out? Hey, that guy hits a bunch of balls right through the box, maybe we should have the second baseman move over that direction a little? Nah, if we do it so will everybody, and we like .350 hitters even when they're on the other team. It would be like a football game where there's a formation where a WR keeps getting completely open downfield and busting 40 yard plays, and it takes 35 years for defenses to adjust. "It's just how it is! If we cover that guy, then the running back might average five yards a carry!"
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...