Jump to content

If Buck is benching Kim based on poor defense, why is Trumbo still getting regular at bats?


TINSTAAPP

Recommended Posts

Both are poor defensively but Trumbo has been considerably worse at the plate since the all-star break. He has a line of .184/.263/.422 with a 78 wRC+ in the second half. Throw in his terrible outfield defense and Trumbo's basically been a replacement-level player in the last couple months. Why does Buck give a pass to Trumbo for his poor play while looking for any reason to glue Kim to the bench?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This is flat out asinine at this point. I'm tired of all the excuses from Roch carrying the team's water too. It is as blatant as it gets right now, and it could very well be costing us games, and a playoff spot.

I don't think I have ever been this furious over something Buck has done. But I am there. Been there for a while actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is flat out asinine at this point. I'm tired of all the excuses from Roch carrying the team's water too. It is as blatant as it gets right now, and it could very well be costing us games, and a playoff spot.

I don't think I have ever been this furious over something Buck has done. But I am there. Been there for a while actually.

I posted this in the game thread:

Buck decided on Kim in spring training and was only using him because he had no choice. Now that he has a choice, he's back to not using him again. It's the same thing Buck did in Texas and it's one thing that holds him back from being better than he is. He plays favorites and makes judgments and does not do what's best for the team when it clashes with his biases for or against certain players. Kim is hitting .308 and OPSing .810 and he's on the bench; .389 OBP. Buck is a fool sometimes.

This is exactly the kind of stuff that makes me say what I say about Buck. He puts his biases above the team too much. There is no excuse for a guy who is as good as hitter as Kim to be playing second fiddle to a guy like Stubbs and certainly Flaherty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Jim Hunter is to be believed, Kim was actually going to pinch hit for Flaherty, but then he was called back because of the game situation, which was two out and none on. That doesn't make a lick of sense to me. It was a one-run game, so a two-out rally isn't out of the question. Besides, doesn't Kim have just as many homers as Flaherty?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Jim Hunter is to be believed, Kim was actually going to pinch hit for Flaherty, but then he was called back because of the game situation, which was two out and none on. That doesn't make a lick of sense to me. It was a one-run game, so a two-out rally isn't out of the question. Besides, doesn't Kim have just as many homers as Flaherty?

Flaherty has more pop I am thinking what Buck is saying.

To me the benching vs lefties makes sense, I don't get the benching vs RHP. He better be playing tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is flat out asinine at this point. I'm tired of all the excuses from Roch carrying the team's water too. It is as blatant as it gets right now, and it could very well be costing us games, and a playoff spot.

I don't think I have ever been this furious over something Buck has done. But I am there. Been there for a while actually.

Right now? He has been this team's Baghdad Bob as far back as I can remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flaherty has more pop I am thinking what Buck is saying.

To me the benching vs lefties makes sense, I don't get the benching vs RHP. He better be playing tomorrow.

Flaherty is slugging a cool .321 right now. The only pop he has is in his fridge. Kim's slugging is like 100 points higher.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this in the game thread:

Buck decided on Kim in spring training and was only using him because he had no choice. Now that he has a choice, he's back to not using him again. It's the same thing Buck did in Texas and it's one thing that holds him back from being better than he is. He plays favorites and makes judgments and does not do what's best for the team when it clashes with his biases for or against certain players. Kim is hitting .308 and OPSing .810 and he's on the bench; .389 OBP. Buck is a fool sometimes.

This is exactly the kind of stuff that makes me say what I say about Buck. He puts his biases above the team too much. There is no excuse for a guy who is as good as hitter as Kim to be playing second fiddle to a guy like Stubbs and certainly Flaherty.

Can't say I disagree with any of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The arguments all sound great in theory, but you aren't going to just bench the league homerun leader.

I think he should be sitting a couple games a week though until he finds his stroke. I agree, him and Davis both in the lineup can be a killer when they are struggling. Very frustrating game tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I also went with Burnes because of his better durability. Since 2019 Snell has pitched more then 128 innings in a season one time (180 innings in 2023). While Burnes has pitched over 167 inning or more every season since becoming a full time starter in 2021. Burnes is also two years younger so in theory while a six year contract is riskier it would end at the same age as Snell on a four year deal. I'd be happy with either one, but my preference in Burnes.
    • Adding that I would go for Roki over either of them.
    • I'd go for Snell. He has true Cy Young stuff. Burnes is really good but his K rate keeps dropping and the years scare me. The box score for his playoff start was solid but he actually gave up a lot of hard contact. I just don't trust him enough to commit all those years and dollars.
    • I go Burnes because to me the higher floor is very important with this sort of deal. I feel like Snell's skillset is more on a razor's edge-- if you didn't like how Burnes pitched in August, Snell is almost certainly more prone to stretches of poor performance like that. Even if he is more dominant at other times to balance it out. Plus, the extra length of Burnes' deal is offset a bit by being 2 years younger. 
    • Snell is injury prone and Burnes is a tough workhorse.
    • Didn't see the video? The ball went maybe 15 feet before it bounced, it was rolling by the dugout.  It was nothing and the Dodgers look soft. Was he supposed to let the discarded ball stay on the field?
    • Rojas pulled from the bases in the 3rd inning after he couldn't manage 2nd to home on a Mookie single (and Ohtani couldn't 1st to 3rd behind him) as the Dodgers try to dig out of 6-1.    Rojas' limited mobility hurt the Dodgers defense on a Bogaerts ground ball where Merrill was too quick going first to second, and Rojas ended up getting no outs on a routine ground ball. Manny with a cagey zigzag baserunning move during the Padres 6-run inning off Buehler, getting into Freeman's throwing lane to put Buehler into the jam. Teoscar grand slam brings it back to 6-5 in the 3rd inning...get your popcorn ready.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...