Jump to content

Trade Britton


25 Nuggets

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply
There is no way that the Orioles would accept so little. Kimbrel. Plus.

Agreed. Especially with Andrew Miller being the possible MVP of the WS. The elite relievers value will be sky high. Perfect time to sell Britton and if you do you have to get a huge haul. That's the only reason I'm advocating for it. We might take a little hit next year, but if we can keep Machado and Schoop long term, it will be worth it.

How about Francona going to his best pitcher in the 5th inning last night?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Especially with Andrew Miller being the possible MVP of the WS. The elite relievers value will be sky high. Perfect time to sell Britton and if you do you have to get a huge haul. That's the only reason I'm advocating for it. We might take a little hit next year, but if we can keep Machado and Schoop long term, it will be worth it.

How about Francona going to his best pitcher in the 5th inning last night?

The "win rule" in action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2016/10/cafardos-latest-bautista-davis-cespedes-balentien.html?fv-home=true&post-id=75714

Other teams are looking get Giolito back for their closer.

Again, the Nationals can buy their needs and hoard their prospects.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They can't buy Britton. And relief is mostly why they lose in the playoff. Every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can't buy Britton. And relief is mostly why they lose in the playoff. Every time.

They can buy Chapman. They can buy Jensen. They can buy Melancon. They can keep Giolito. They can keep Ross. They can keep Turner. They can keep Robles. They can keep Lopez.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can buy Chapman. They can buy Jensen. They can buy Melancon. They can keep Giolito. They can keep Ross. They can keep Turner. They can keep Robles. They can keep Lopez.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

One would think they would have been higher than 10th in total payroll last year (O's were 12th).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can buy Chapman. They can buy Jensen. They can buy Melancon. They can keep Giolito. They can keep Ross. They can keep Turner. They can keep Robles. They can keep Lopez.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I guess Chapman might help. Melancon didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Malancon pitched to a 1.81 ERA and a 0.80 WHIP and didn't allow an earned run in the playoffs. He helped.

It's kind of like saying Zach Britton didn't help us.

True. But we would be on the trading end. Not the buying. Melancon is no Britton and even you aren't purporting that. The thing is, washing is very desperate to get back. And advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hays and Reyes aren't close to getting Robles. Britton isn't getting Giolito. No way he Nats do this.

Giolito's a fine prospect, but I think his trade value went down considerably with his poor performances with the Nats, and he might not even make their rotation next season. Compare him to Urias of the Dodgers, and he's fallen way behind him in trade value, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giolito's a fine prospect, but I think his trade value went down considerably with his poor performances with the Nats, and he might not even make their rotation next season. Compare him to Urias of the Dodgers, and he's fallen way behind him in trade value, imo.

I never would have put him even with Urias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giolito's a fine prospect, but I think his trade value went down considerably with his poor performances with the Nats, and he might not even make their rotation next season. Compare him to Urias of the Dodgers, and he's fallen way behind him in trade value, imo.

Based on 4 starts you think his trade value is down considerably? That's more than a little premature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on 4 starts you think his trade value is down considerably? That's more than a little premature.

4 starts and 2 long relief appearances. I'd agree with you if we're just talking stats, but watching the kid pitch, I couldn't see how people had him as the #1 pitching prospect in baseball - which is where many experts had him - actually, I think many still have him at #1 going into 2017. His stuff is not overwhelming. And while I didn't expect his command to be great at 22, it was worse than I'd expect for a top prospect. I may be premature, but that's how I see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
    • Realistically I think Adley as the leadoff guy is the best lineup for us but if he has trouble batting leadoff in half the games because he can't get his catcher's gear off fast enough then I get it.   Cowser has continued to be incredibly patient, and if Adley can't be our leadoff guy then Cowser is probably our next best option.  Of course Cowser also hits a lot of bombs, so it'd be interesting if he goes on another heater.   If Cowser gets off the schneid then Cowser leadoff and Gunnar at 2 could be incredibly potent.  I don't think Cowser is actually playing that badly, he's just been running into some bad luck.  And he's starting to wake up a little bit anyway.
    • Agreed, appreciate the stats. Gunnar isn't a leadoff hitter - he's a prototypical #3 hitter or cleanup hitter. Hyde writes poor lineups, and Gunnar hitting leadoff has been one of the consistent problems with the offense this season. Gunnar hitting mostly solo shots is both a consequence and reflection of this offense's flaws - the O's have too many low-OBP hitters in the lineup (hitting in less-than-optimal spots for the most part) and are too reliant on solo homers to generate runs. At least Hyde has started hitting Westburg leadoff against LHP, which is progress, but Hyde is way too stubborn and too slow to make the correct adjustments. He's very similar to Buck Showalter in that respect.  Anyway, I look forward to Hyde waking up and moving Gunnar down to #3/#4 against RHP.  
    • While the return on the Tettleton trade wasn't ideal, 1: I don't think you can really expect a 30 year old catcher to put up a career year and then follow it up with another one, and 2: we had Chris Hoiles who played quite well for us following Tettleton's departure.  If we had forward thinking GMs we probably would split them at C and give them DH/1B/OF games on their non catching days, which is what Detroit did with Tettleton to prolong his career after 1992.  (He was basically the same hitter from 1993-1995 but he stopped catching with regularity so his WAR was much lower.)   The Davis trade was so completely undefensible on every level, not the least of which because we already had a player who was at least as good as Davis was on the team, but he didn't fit the stereotypical batting profile of a 1B.  At least today teams wouldn't be so quick to dismiss a 10 HR first baseman if he's got an OBP of .400.
    • The Glenn Davis trade was so bad it overshadowed another really bad trade in team history. The Orioles traded Mickey Tettleton that same offseason for Jeff Robinson in part because Tettleton had an off year in 1990 with a .223 batting average and a .381 slugging percentage. Except Tettleton drew 116 walks making his OBP .376 and his OPS+ was 116. Jeff Robinson was coming off a 5.96 ERA in 145 innings pitched. I have no idea what the team was thinking with this trade. Robinson did manage to lower his ERA in 1991 to 5.18 his only Orioles season. There's no way this trade is made today in the age of analytics. Tettleton meanwhile put up 171 home runs and an .859 OPS for the remainder of his career. 😬 Just a bad trade that doesn't get talked about enough thanks to Glenn Davis.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...