Jump to content

More Pitching


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Rene88 said:

So all young pitchers are the same? Tyler throws electric stuff in the mid to upper-nineties? Had no idea, thanks.

No, I did not say ALL young pitchers are the same.  I was just pointing out that you seem confused as to what is deemed a proper amount of time for "Young" pitchers to apply their stuff at the MLB Level.  Jake Arrieta started 63 games for Baltimore and appeared in 69 Games and now in hindsight you think he should of been kept while Tyler Wilson has appeared in 33 games with 18 starts.  You think a pitcher that amassed a 1.472 WHIP is better than one that has amassed a 1.415 WHIP.  You think that a 4.78 ERA is worse than a 5.46 ERA.  I suppose that in their heyday, while here, you preferred Daniel Cabrera to Jeremy Guthrie.  To each their own I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I disagree with your assessment.   Were we competing for last place last year with the same staff?     I think it's reasonable to expect growth from Bundy and for one of Ubaldo/Gallardo/Miley to bounce back.    Once we got Wright and Wilson out of the rotation, the starters did pretty well in the second half.    

To me, it's all about how we reconstruct RF/DH, now that we know what's happening at C.

You mean the Bundy that Weams just said isn't a lock for the rotation in another thread?:)

You can disagree all you want, doesn't make you right either. I said it was a mistake to let Cruz walk and it will end up costing us, people said that was nonsense. I told people why LaCava turned down the GM job and said it shows Angelos still isn't out of the picture (he signed Davis over DD). I can be wrong but connected enough to what's going on.

This team is an injury or two in the SP staff from a "blow it up" scenario. I guess we will see how the offseason plays out. 

Davis needs protection, agreed, but much less important than our SP staff. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Rene88 said:

A lot of stuff differently:)

Right now? Man, I wouldn't have signed Gallardo or traded for Miley, that's for sure. But it is what it is.

I would do whatever I could to get rid of Ubaldo, highly unlikely. Same with both Gallardo and or Miley. Get rid of the one with the highest offer, used other 2 as innings eaters and trade away Britton for a haul of young starting pitching talent. Make Brach and/or Joe Jordan's SS of the future, the closer. We will still be competitive. One of those prospects have to be AA or AAA and we plug them in mid-season.

Heck, if we can get a good SP prospect with Grandy for Brach, I would do that and make O'day or Givens the closer and I still think we will be competitive.

I would sadly talk to the Nats about Gio Gonzalez. He might be okay in the AL East for 1 year. Pickings are slim, that's why don't give up on the Jake Arietta's of the world but I digress...

I need to comb over the list of SP available, but I know the list is thin. I would have gone after Dickey, was disappointed he signed with Braves so quickly.

 

Lots of revisionist history here.  You wouldn't sign Gallardo or trade for Miley.  We made the playoffs with both of them on the roster and if either one of them pitches to expectations then we probably win the division.  Then you bring up Jake Arrieta, he was never going to get it together in the AL East.  It's all about confidence.  He didn't have it here.  

Gio Gonzalez isn't "ok" in the NL East.  He's a bum.  Point blank.  

Granderson isn't worth Brach.  We could just sign Rasmus or Pagan for half the contract and keep Brach.  I don't care what prospect you're bringing back.  

There is no rotation in the AL East that is "comfortable" other than the Red Sox.  Should've, Would've, Could've. c Let's see how their 4 LH's play up over the course of a season.  

We have the best bullpen.

This team is real close, and is definitely closer than the NATS.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Rene88 said:

We can get in without Britton, so you reload for young starting pitching prospects now if you care about the long-term competitiveness of the franchise, that's why.

And despite the OH spreading the fallacy that anyone can win the WS if you just get in, starting pitching is a large part of that formula that this team greatly lacks. Is it possible to win with poor starting pitching? Sure. I guess, anything is possible, just look at the events of 2016, but highly unlikely and not a formula for long-term sustainability.

Yet, look at 2014, and they went to the ALDS, without MW and Manny, and even Chris Davis for 50 games.

It is not fallacy, that a Wildcard winner can win the WS, its been done as recently as 2011 and 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

Yet, look at 2014, and they went to the ALDS, without MW and Manny, and even Chris Davis for 50 games.

It is not fallacy, that a Wildcard winner can win the WS, its been done as recently as 2011 and 2014.

And bigots can be elected president, anything is possible these days but odds are against you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rene88 said:

6 years?

http://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/how-many-mlb-wild-card-teams-have-won-the-world-series.html/?a=viewall

I will look up the starting staff of these teams...I be they weren't compiled of Ubaldo and Gallardo.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball_wild_card

 

2011 - St Louis Cards

2014 - San Francisco Giants

Also,

2016 - Toronto Blue Jays went to ALCS.

So it was pretty close to 3 times in 6 years, which is 50%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Rene88 said:

You mean the Bundy that Weams just said isn't a lock for the rotation in another thread?:)

You can disagree all you want, doesn't make you right either.

 

 

It's a matter of opinion.    We won't know whose opinion was correct until next season plays out.    But I've given you my reasons why I think our starting rotation will be better in 2017 than it was in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Rene88 said:

6 years?

http://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/how-many-mlb-wild-card-teams-have-won-the-world-series.html/?a=viewall

I will look up the starting staff of these teams...I be they weren't compiled of Ubaldo and Gallardo.

Maybe you would have better luck and less frustration just rooting for the Nats only then...just an option. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball_wild_card

 

2011 - St Louis Cards

2014 - San Francisco Giants

Also,

2016 - Toronto Blue Jays went to ALCS.

So it was pretty close to 3 times in 6 years, which is 50%

Great starting pitching with the exception of Toronto is my guess without looking it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Rene88 said:

Great starting pitching with the exception of Toronto is my guess without looking it up.

I did look it up, and both 2011 and 2014, had good starting pitching, but neither would be what I would consider Great.

San Fran did have Bumgarner, who was very good 18-10, but they also had 2 also SP, with sub .500 records and 13 loses a piece.

Cards have a 11-9. 13-7, 14-8 and 12-9. Not exactly stellar, but good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I did look it up, and both 2011 and 2014, had good starting pitching, but neither would be what I would consider Great.

San Fran did have Bumgarner, who was very good 18-10, but they also had 2 also SP, with sub .500 records and 13 loses a piece.

Cards have a 11-9. 13-7, 14-8 and 12-9. Not exactly stellar, but good.

Thank you sir. Agree to disagree. I don't think the way the SP staff is currently assembled we can get to the WS. That is my opinion. I think if we have an injury to Tillman, Gausman or Bundy the wheels fall off very rapidly.

I am pulling for your Skins though. I went to the Packers game and that was fun, very cold out there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Rene88 said:

Great starting pitching with the exception of Toronto is my guess without looking it up.

 

8 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I did look it up, and both 2011 and 2014, had good starting pitching, but neither would be what I would consider Great.

San Fran did have Bumgarner, who was very good 18-10, but they also had 2 also SP, with sub .500 records and 13 loses a piece.

Cards have a 11-9. 13-7, 14-8 and 12-9. Not exactly stellar, but good.

2011: Cardinals starters were 8th in the NL in ERA.

2014: Giants' starters were 10th in the NL in ERA.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Only ones I’d look to extend now are Gunnar, and maybe Holliday or Basallo. Premium defensive positions and young enough to not worry about going past their primes. Westburg would need to be a team friendly deal as he’s older and I wonder if we’re getting his best years now. 
    • I've never played in a beer league software league.  Is it drunk programming?  Sounds fun. Don't a lot of beer leagues limit the amount of Homeruns you can hit? With the way pitching and defense is currently don't all team struggle to score when they don't hit HR?  Seven players hit .300.  It's pretty hard to string together three hits in an inning with what pitching looks like these days.
    • Gunnar is the only one you worry about. I would still sign Holliday as well but I think Gunnar is the bigger fish to fry. I no longer would consider an extension for Adley. I would wait on anyone else.
    • Something that doesn't show up on the stat sheet is something like being able to hit behind the runner to advance him.   The O's have been successful in building an analytics offense.   Focus on hitting homeruns, develop a swing to achieve optimum launch angle and exit velocity to hit the ball over the fence.  Result is they have a team of beer league software players and not baseball players and struggle to score when not hitting homeruns.   Analytically, if you review their offensive rankings for the season, it says, nothing wrong with the offense, at least from a macro review, but we all know that this offense has issues.   Runs - 4th Home runs - 3rd AVG - 7th OBP - 11th SLG - 3rd OPS - 4th  K's - 18th (this was interesting to see considering how much they seem to strikeout) All of the above looks good, nothing to fix. The O's had 6 sacrifice hits for the season, ranking 30th.  Interestingly, Arizona who led the league in runs scored also led the league in sacrifice hits with 34.   The O's do not need to necessarily to focus on small ball, but they do need to be able to add that skillset to their offensive arsenal.  
    • Sounds like Buck. Anything to get a slight advantage. It’s something this team sorely misses. 
    • Detroit has been so much fun to watch. They have Skubal and literally 11 completely interchangeable pitchers who Hinch uses at any time and in any situation. They all can start games, throw in middle relief, and close. Every Tigers pitcher has to be ready to come in at any time because nobody other than Skubal actually has a defined role, which can certainly help keep them focused.  That guy Holton who started Game 1 in Cleveland closed Game 3 yesterday.  Of course he did! And Hinch seems to have complete faith in everybody, which I guess works since they all seem to have rubber arms and never get tired. It must be so annoying as an opposing manager to try and game plan against them or to be a hitter and have absolutely no idea who you are going to be facing until you actually walk up to the plate.  Not sure how long this "gimmick" will last, but it has been really enjoyable.
    • So if Westburg ends up being a very good but not MVP level player you aren't interesting in extending him at a team friendly rate? I disagree with your strategy. If you can lock up even a young 3 win player at a team friendly rate I say do it.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...