Jump to content

Poll: What should the Orioles do with Trumbo?


Spy Fox

What should the Orioles do with Trumbo?  

88 members have voted

  1. 1. What should the Orioles do with Trumbo?

    • They should sign Trumbo even if it costs more than 3/$50M
      0
    • They should sign Trumbo but not for more than about 3/$50M
    • They should sign Trumbo but not for more than about 3/$40M
    • They should maybe sign Trumbo, and multi-year is OK, but only if his price drops below 3/$40M
    • They should maybe sign Trumbo, but only if his price drops to a one-year deal
    • They should not sign Trumbo regardless of his price


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

So from the poll it seems that a slight majority of people are for signing Trumbo at a good cost, while a solid chunk still prefers going another direction regardless.

I count myself in the latter group while other options still remain, but won't be too disappointed if we sign Trumbo to a team-friendly deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we didn't have Davis signed, I'd be fine with giving him a 3 year deal for 50M and having him be the everyday first baseman.  But he's a liability in RF, and the O's are already locked in to bad defense at one corner outfield position.  There should be a home for him in a major league starting lineup, but not with the O's.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dan-O said:

Pretty much a foregone conclusion that he signs with us at 3/$40, I'd say. His agent I'm sure is just holding out a bit longer and/or they are negotiating particulars of the deal.

3/$40 may not the be the best option but it's a bit more palatable than 4/$56.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

If we didn't have Davis signed, I'd be fine with giving him a 3 year deal for 50M and having him be the everyday first baseman.  But he's a liability in RF, and the O's are already locked in to bad defense at one corner outfield position.  There should be a home for him in a major league starting lineup, but not with the O's.  

Sure - Colorado.  They really don't need to be playing Gerardo Parra every day.  We Oriole fans know about that.

-edit- forgot about David Dahl.  But still...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mayor McCheese said:

I have been saying this all offseason.  The Orioles will sign Trumbo to a 1 year deal.  He's not going to get the 3/4 year deal he wants.... I think its best for the Orioles to just pay him the $18-$20MM this year with incentives.

 

Do you think that if the O's don't sign him he will go unsigned until June?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mayor McCheese said:

I have been saying this all offseason.  The Orioles will sign Trumbo to a 1 year deal.  He's not going to get the 3/4 year deal he wants.... I think its best for the Orioles to just pay him the $18-$20MM this year with incentives.

 

If he has no takers at this point in the Off-Season then why would the Orioles "Overpay" at $18 to $20 Million??  It seems that the market would be more around the $10 Million mark for a year of service.  Add incentives for games played/plate appearances that would get it to $11 Million.  Add MVP voting $$$, HR Title $$$, that could get it to a $12/$13 million figure.  This would be more inline with the lost pick associated with the QO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thezeroes said:

If he has no takers at this point in the Off-Season then why would the Orioles "Overpay" at $18 to $20 Million??  It seems that the market would be more around the $10 Million mark for a year of service.  Add incentives for games played/plate appearances that would get it to $11 Million.  Add MVP voting $$$, HR Title $$$, that could get it to a $12/$13 million figure.  This would be more inline with the lost pick associated with the QO.

I think sometimes people mistakenly see that a player hasn't signed by mid-January and infer that means there is no market for that player.   But sometimes it's just the agent stubbornly holding out for a slightly better deal than decent deals that already have been offered.    I don't know if that's the case here, but it could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think sometimes people mistakenly see that a player hasn't signed by mid-January and infer that means there is no market for that player.   But sometimes it's just the agent stubbornly holding out for a slightly better deal than decent deals that already have been offered.    I don't know if that's the case here, but it could be.

I agree that the agents sometimes overshoot the market for players.  I do not think that this should be rewarded by an overpay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • ???. Cowser took more swings against LF than any other LH hitter on the team ( not named  Henderson). He was one of the guys they did not platoon.
    • I think Kevin Seiyltzer was the fall guy for a team that thought they were a championship team.  This guy has overseen more a decade of hitting in Atlanta, has been through developing and helping young batters succeed when the league adjusts.  Most importantly, he has a ring! 
    • Glad one poseur AL team is out.  I hope CLE wins and knocks the other one out tomorrow. 
    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...