Jump to content

Will Hosmer be this year's Porcello?


Recommended Posts

The guy who slips very far because he is a HSer and signability issues(ie Boras issues)....What do you guys think?

I think that it is def a possibility. I think that taking a HS kid is already a much bigger risk than a college player. Taking one at 6 million per season is a huge risk IMO. I remember Rowell being the top HS kid the year that we drafted him. I already get frustrated with his development because I am so impatient. I can imagine how frustrated I would be if we gave him that kind of money too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy who slips very far because he is a HSer and signability issues(ie Boras issues)....What do you guys think?

Porcello also stated his strong desire to pitch at UNC. I haven't heard that from Hosmer, yet (re: Arizona State). Porcello looked like he would need to be convinced to sign, Hosmer is just asking for a lot of money. I doubt he drops outside of the Top 15, and I think he goes Top 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy who slips very far because he is a HSer and signability issues(ie Boras issues)....What do you guys think?

I thought Porcello also had an injury last year. It was a combination of things with him if I remember correctly.

EDIT: I was wrong. I think Brackman had injuries that caused him to drop. Not Porcello.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Porcello also had an injury last year. It was a combination of things with him if I remember correctly.

I believe you are thinking of Brackman, who dropped to the Yankees because of signability and cost -- he had TJ after being drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Porcello's slipping to the bottom of the round had as much to do with the fact that he was a hs pitcher, which made him a much more of a risk for injuries, as it did with how much he was asking for. Hosmer doesn't have that problem. I doubt seriously, as things stand right now, that he falls past #8. Someone will pay him $4-5 million, probably not $7 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Porcello's slipping to the bottom of the round had as much to do with the fact that he was a hs pitcher, which made him a much more of a risk for injuries, as it did with how much he was asking for. Hosmer doesn't have that problem. I doubt seriously, as things stand right now, that he falls past #8. Someone will pay him $4-5 million, probably not $7 million.

Maybe, but HS pitchers aren't generally avoided in the 1st round:

'07 -- Parker (1:9), Bumgarner (1:10), Aumont (1:11), Beaven (1:17), Withrow (1:20), Alderson (1:22), Main (1:24), Porcello (1:27)

I'm not sure there is a greater chance of injury for HS kids, either, considering the win-first stance most D-I college coaches take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, but HS pitchers aren't generally avoided in the 1st round:

'07 -- Parker (1:9), Bumgarner (1:10), Aumont (1:11), Beaven (1:17), Withrow (1:20), Alderson (1:22), Main (1:24), Porcello (1:27)

I'm not sure there is a greater chance of injury for HS kids, either, considering the win-first stance most D-I college coaches take.

I understand what you are saying here. The other pitchers were drafted ahead of Porcello because of the $$ he wanted. If not for that, then he would have been the first hs pitcher drafted most likely. That kind of money for a pitcher is more of a risk than it is for a hitter.

Last year's draft was an aberration. Even so, there wasn't any before #9, 10 and 11. They are all studs, but there have been numerous articles outlining the disparity of round 1 hs pitchers making it to the ML in comparison with college pitchers. Hitters are a much safer bet in the top 10 or so picks than pitchers. It has been researched and proven over and over again.

If a pitcher is overused in college, scouts will know about it and it will hurt the kid's draft status.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year's draft was an aberration. Even so, there wasn't any before #9, 10 and 11. They are all studs, but there have been numerous articles outlining the disparity of round 1 hs pitchers making it to the ML in comparison with college pitchers. Hitters are a much safer bet in the top 10 or so picks than pitchers. It has been researched and proven over and over again.

If a pitcher is overused in college, scouts will know about it and it will hurt the kid's draft status.

I don't know about aberration, but it was definitely strong in HS arms (just like this year's is strong in college 1bs).

Almost every elite college pitcher is "overused".

It is certainly a bit more difficult for HS pitchers to make the ML because they have an extra 2-years or so in which they could be injured. Porcello has been absolutely filthy, though, and I could easily see him pitching for the Tigers by the end of next season. His stuff was known to be this good at draft time, so I don't think there is a real issue of whether or not he'd be a good bet to make a ML rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what you are saying here. The other pitchers were drafted ahead of Porcello because of the $$ he wanted. If not for that, then he would have been the first hs pitcher drafted most likely. That kind of money for a pitcher is more of a risk than it is for a hitter.

Last year's draft was an aberration. Even so, there wasn't any before #9, 10 and 11. They are all studs, but there have been numerous articles outlining the disparity of round 1 hs pitchers making it to the ML in comparison with college pitchers. Hitters are a much safer bet in the top 10 or so picks than pitchers. It has been researched and proven over and over again.

If a pitcher is overused in college, scouts will know about it and it will hurt the kid's draft status.

Just like the Orioles knew Ben McDonald was overused. :angryfire:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...