Jump to content

Ryan Adams keeps a hot hand...


Lucky Jim

Recommended Posts

I just don't see where he would have value in the OF - unless he develops some power all of a sudden.

I know nothing of Adams. Does he have the speed to convert to CF? That could hide some of the lack of power. If he can play a good defensive CF and hit for high AVG and OBP the lack of power wouldn't be a big issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I know nothing of Adams. Does he have the speed to convert to CF? That could hide some of the lack of power. If he can play a good defensive CF and hit for high AVG and OBP the lack of power wouldn't be a big issue.

If his bat is truly developing to where we thought it would be when we drafted him (and we drafted him for his bat, not his glove) then I'm not too worried about power.

If he's the kind of guy who can put up a .300/.375/.450 line, spray line drives all over the field pretty regularly and play a competent LF, then that can work.

Understand, we're likely to get above-average power from both CF and C in the near term. Having a true #2 hitter in LF won't kill us.

We should worry less about "fit" and more about whether this is the real Ryan Adams we're seeing at the plate and not just another, uh.....heartbreaker.*

*Sorry, had to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the bright side. With Henson, Adams and maybe Blake Davis in the minors...it looks like we are beginning to have a few MI prospects in the system. I really like what I have seen so far from Adams and Henson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

considering the strikeout % , It may not matter where he plays.

If he can keep his Ks at his May rate (1:4) and his walk BB:K ratio similar (8:19) then he'll be okay.

Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised to see improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he can keep his Ks at his May rate (1:4) and his walk BB:K ratio similar (8:19) then he'll be okay.

Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised to see improvement.

I agree with this. But his K rate was so bad in April that it's hard to tell whether he's just on a hot streak or has actually made notable adjustments in his approach (ala Brandon Snyder last year) that allow him to make better contact. His current BABIP is like .415, which is not sustainable long-term. So yes, if he can at least be around 25% or lower on the K rate and around 8-10% on the walk rate then he may be able to sustain his performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony, does Adams have enough power to succeed as an OF?

Not sure really. He seems to have some pop, and obviously he'd be more valuable at second base, but even before the Steve Sax thing, I really never thought he was a very good second baseman anyways.

I agree with everyone that he'll need to hit for more power to play in the outfield, but he is showing some pop with the doubles so that's good to see. I could see him possibly developing into an Eric Brynes type of left fielder as a best case scenario.

Something has to be done with him at second though. 29 errors at this point in the season is not fair for the pitching staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure really. He seems to have some pop, and obviously he'd be more valuable at second base, but even before the Steve Sax thing, I really never thought he was a very good second baseman anyways.

I agree with everyone that he'll need to hit for more power to play in the outfield, but he is showing some pop with the doubles so that's good to see. I could see him possibly developing into an Eric Brynes type of left fielder as a best case scenario.

Something has to be done with him at second though. 29 errors at this point in the season is not fair for the pitching staff.

Until this last game, things had calmed down a little - "only" two errors in 13 games, I think.

I'd like to hear from Doc Shorebird on this. Are these almost all throwing errors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's apparently is his problem. He's got that Steve Sax syndrome where he can't make the throws. I'm impressed myself that he hasn't let it effect his hitting.

Wow, that's odd.

I remember from my playing days when I was a pitcher, I messed that "easy" throw up to first a time or two. You field the ball, you have all the time in the world to get it there. It's not a far throw, so you don't want to gun it, then you start to think about it instead of react and do what's natural...and thats where the problems start.

Fortunately it never became like Knoblauch/Sax for me...as rare as it is, I can see how it happens if one were to let it consume them.

It is impressive that it hasn't effected his offensive game, though, I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Looks like Adams was possibly pulled from yesterday's game. Had just 2 plate appearances. He's sort've become my "favorite guy to follow" because I'm impresssed that he's kept his bat going with all the fielding troubles.

Was he injured at all yesterday?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adams finished off the suspended game from 6/9 today with a 4 for 4 effort, then went 2 for 3 in the second game. His line now reads .308/.372/.441.

This guy is proving he can hit, though he's still striking out a lot (once every 4 PAs). Now if we could just hide him in the field somewhere. Last I looked, he had 32 errors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adams finished off the suspended game from 6/9 today with a 4 for 4 effort, then went 2 for 3 in the second game. His line now reads .308/.372/.441.

This guy is proving he can hit, though he's still striking out a lot (once every 4 PAs). Now if we could just hide him in the field somewhere. Last I looked, he had 32 errors.

I love seeing this...when a guy with skills just suddenly "figures it out" at the minor-league level.

Now, if that could only happen for me at my firm...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoosiers was high on Adams when we drafted him. I was coming pretty close to teasing him recently because he was looking like a total bust. I'm glad I didn't. The defense struggles seem like they were mostly mental and he seems to have settled down some in that area. If he can stay at 2B, he's got a good chance to succeed. The bat is really coming around. The plate discipline needs to improve and I do remember someone who's seen him saying that he couldn't hit a curveball to save his life. Well, he's either learned to hit a curveball or he doesn't miss any of the fastballs that he gets. He's using the whole field and getting his share of doubles with the occasional jack. I think we might have another positional prospect here.

I don't want to jinx him as he's been on fire for over a month - very nice stats. At this pace, he will be among the better hitting prospects to go through DelMarva.

I would do everything possible to keep him at second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...