Jump to content

Wright lit up yet again..can we move him to the bp already?


Rene88

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, scOtt said:

A couple ST stints 2 years ago? Can you pick any smaller sample size?

 

onoz_omg.gif

No, I couldn't pick a bigger one either since we haven't seen it.  You are missing the point.  

We've seen his stuff play up as a reliever and he is at the end of his rope as a starter.  It's time to see what he can do a a reliever rather than speculate about it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
28 minutes ago, MDtransplant757 said:

I would love to see us get a younger JJ out of Wright. Who would we target is the question, though

Yeah, Hardy was not considered a good bet at the time because of injuries. The Twins had given up on him. Wright has no value and it would basically be a roll of the dice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

No, I couldn't pick a bigger one either since we haven't seen it.  You are missing the point.  

We've seen his stuff play up as a reliever and he is at the end of his rope as a starter.  It's time to see what he can do a a reliever rather than speculate about it.  

I'm with Frobby. I don't think his stuff plays, starter or reliever. Only 119 ML innings but .864 OPS, 5.72 K/9, 1.48 WHIP. And that deer in the headlights look he gets when he is in trouble. Folds like a bad hand in poker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChuckS said:

No, I couldn't pick a bigger one either since we haven't seen it.  You are missing the point.  

We've seen his stuff play up as a reliever and he is at the end of his rope as a starter.  It's time to see what he can do a a reliever rather than speculate about it.  

Actually, we've seen Wright pitch in relief in the majors numerous times.   He's had 9 relief outings in the majors, and has done OK (2.57 ERA, 1.357 WHIP, 2.6 K/9).   So we don't need to look at spring training performance.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Actually, we've seen Wright pitch in relief in the majors numerous times.   He's had 9 relief outings in the majors, and has done OK (2.57 ERA, 1.357 WHIP, 2.6 K/9).   So we don't need to look at spring training performance.   

 

I didn't know how to weed out starting stats vs. reliever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Actually, we've seen Wright pitch in relief in the majors numerous times.   He's had 9 relief outings in the majors, and has done OK (2.57 ERA, 1.357 WHIP, 2.6 K/9).   So we don't need to look at spring training performance.   

 

I recall him coming out of the pen as a long reliever or pitching multiple innings a few times.  I don't recall a whole lot of short one inning stints.  

Regardless, the numbers you provided show he could use another look as a reliever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

I recall him coming out of the pen as a long reliever or pitching multiple innings a few times.  I don't recall a whole lot of short one inning stints.  

Regardless, the numbers you provided show he could use another look as a reliever. 

He did get a number of shorter stints.   6 of his 9 appearances have been an inning or less.    All the runs he's allowed in relief came in his longer outings.     So, nothing in the small sample disproves your theory.    Oddly, he hasn't struck anybody out in his shorter outings.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...