Jump to content

Connolly: Orioles starting pitching historically bad


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

http://www.baltimorebaseball.com/2017/06/20/orioles-allowed-5-runs-16-straight-al-least-104-years/

"After losing 12-0 to the Cleveland Indians on Monday, the Orioles have allowed their opponents to score five runs or more in 16 straight games. According to baseball-reference.com, which has a database that goes back to 1913, that’s never been done in the American League – or at least not in the past 104 years."

"Although it’s not exactly record-worthy, the Orioles also have allowed 10 runs or more in five of their last 10 games. In those five games, the Orioles have been outscored 63-15. In the 16 games in which they’ve given up five or more runs, the Orioles have been outscored 123-64."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm picking nits here, but the record we just set falls on the entire staff, not just the starting pitchers.    The streak includes:

June 3 - Bundy allows 2 runs in 5 IP, bullpen allows 3.

June 9 - Bundy allows 3 runs in 6 IP, bullpen allows 5.

June 18 - Ubaldo allows 2 runs in 7 IP, bullpen allows 3.    

The starter allowed 4 runs on June 6-7, but I won't fault the bullpen in those for allowing the 5th run.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's good this team can bash once and awhile, it's amazing they even won 5 games during that 16 game stretch. O.o

The only time I remember anything this bad is like that 0-21 start in 88.

Yeah this is historically BAD pitching. There is NOT ONE guy who's been on that Norfolk express who should sniff a MLB stadium they are HORRIFIC.

 ADD starters Gausman, Tillman, and Ublado and it adds up to and all time O's BAD ALL STAR pitching staff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Imagine if we had mediocre pitching. We'd be running away with this division.:)

I get the joke, but the fact is that just mediocre pitching and the O's would be in first place. There are no dominant teams in the AL East this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, pastorfan said:

Yet not everyone is convinced we should look to sell this year. That, my friend, is amazingly bad!

I think everyone is thinking sell but not everyone thinks now is the time.  If we look like this a month from now then everyone will say sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...