Jump to content

POLL: Yay or nay on Beckham trade?


PaulFolk

POLL: Do you like the Tim Beckham trade?  

133 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the Tim Beckham trade?

    • Yes. Beckham is under control through 2020 and could be the SS of the future.
      92
    • No. We should be acquiring prospects, not trading them away.
      24
    • Meh. Nothing lost, nothing gained.
      17

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 295
  • Created
  • Last Reply
46 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Gimme a break.  He had a 135 OPS+ for the O's.  The O's MVP had a 126 OPS+.  We can debate his defense, but I think it's ridiculous to complain about his offense.      

Frankly, I'd be thrilled if Beckham in 2018 can replicate what he's done overall in 2017 -- .280/.330/.457, 22 HR, 62 RBI, 3.4 rWAR, 3.4 fWAR.   Despite the errors, the advanced metrics have him at about average defensively.     I think there's still a little room for growth here.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Gimme a break.  He had a 135 OPS+ for the O's.  The O's MVP had a 126 OPS+.  We can debate his defense, but I think it's ridiculous to complain about his offense.      

I think his track record on offense is debatable. If he had performed consistently above what he did with the Rays they may have been reticent to move him. Above average offensive production covers a multitude of sins on defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

I think his track record on offense is debatable. If he had performed consistently above what he did with the Rays they may have been reticent to move him. Above average offensive production covers a multitude of sins on defense.

The lowest OPS+ he's had in his career is 93.  There aren't many SS's who can say that - probably none in the O's history.  I stand by my comment.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I'd agree, but I like the trend line.   His K rate leaves him vulnerable but he's got good speed and pop.

 

7 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

The lowest OPS+ he's had in his career is 93.  There aren't many SS's who can say that - probably none in the O's history.  I stand by my comment.  

I'm not arguing except to say there's still a little question about his history and whether  or not he can become a  consistent offensive producer. He is trending upwards and I like his approach at the plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, webbrick2010 said:

In 3 years when Tobias Myers is breaking into the Ray rotation and Beckham has already been dumped after being the worst defensive SS in O's history, someone will dig up this thread/poll

Tim Beckham is not a SS for a good ML team

I think Tobias Myers has the potential to be a good major league pitcher, but I doubt it happens in three years.    The Rays are good at developing pitchers, and their track record is that they're very patient with them and don't skip steps in the development process.   I'd guess the earliest you'd see Myers is the 2nd half of 2021, if then.

I don't want to judge Beckham on two months or even his full year, but I think you're vastly understating his potential.   He's been an above average major league player this season, which is really his first full season in the majors.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think Tobias Myers has the potential to be a good major league pitcher, but I doubt it happens in three years.    The Rays are good at developing pitchers, and their track record is that they're very patient with them and don't skip steps in the development process.   I'd guess the earliest you'd see Myers is the 2nd half of 2021, if then.

I don't want to judge Beckham on two months or even his full year, but I think you're vastly understating his potential.   He's been an above average major league player this season, which is really his first full season in the majors.   

We'll see... someone will bump this thread in a year or two or again in three and just like the recent bumps of Davis and Trumbo threads those who were in the minority will be correct again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

We'll see... someone will bump this thread in a year or two or again in three and just like the recent bumps of Davis and Trumbo threads those who were in the minority will be correct again

Feeling your oats, eh?    Well, can't say I blame you.   You're right that this will get bumped, one way or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

We'll see... someone will bump this thread in a year or two or again in three and just like the recent bumps of Davis and Trumbo threads those who were in the minority will be correct again

You should sue SNL for their Debbie Downer being character infringement on you.  <cue sound effects>    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

We'll see... someone will bump this thread in a year or two or again in three and just like the recent bumps of Davis and Trumbo threads those who were in the minority will be correct again

We shall see but I don't think we know yet. My scout friend  said he got pull happy in Tampa and they wanted him to  use his speed more. Maybe getting traded was a wake up call. Just thought it was weird that Roch mentioned trading him. He usually spouts the company line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After looking at the list of FA shortstops, I think you can pretty much pencil in Beckham as our starter. 

 

PLAYER (12)
POS.
AGE
TEAM
H
RBI
HR
AVG
OPS
IP
ERA
W
SV
2017 SALARY
MARKET VALUE (AAV)
Zack Cozart SS 32 CIN 129 62 24 .299 .941         $5,325,000 $13,684,786
Eduardo Nunez SS 30 BOS 146 58 12 .313 .801         $4,200,000 $15,219,014
Andres Blanco SS 33 PHI 25 13 3 .192 .549 0.3       $3,000,000 -
Darwin Barney SS 31 TOR 76 24 5 .232 .597         $2,887,500 -
Alcides Escobar SS 30 KC 146 51 6 .250 .625         $6,500,000 $9,907,443
Cliff Pennington SS 33 LAA 48 19 3 .259 .652         $2,250,000 -
Erick Aybar SS 33 SD 75 21 7 .228 .635 1.3       $1,750,000 -
Ruben Tejada SS 27 BAL 26 5   .230 .576         $1,350,000 -
Chris Volstad SS 31 CHW           13.3       $535,000 -
Danny Espinosa SS 30 TB 46 31 6 .173 .523         $535,000 -
Paul Janish SS 34 BAL 2 3   .077 .188         $535,000 -
Everth Cabrera SS 30 CHW      
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Let  Westy  play 3B vs right handed pitching and LF vs left-handed pitching.    Urias can play 3B vs lefties.   This is only needed if Cowser can't hit lefties. Mateo and Westy can be platoon in the outfield IMO.
    • O'Neil seems like a perfect fit if he doesn't cost too much in years or dollars.   
    • I don’t think we choked. Stubborn as hell. We literally went down with the same sinking ship philosophy that we had the entire 2nd half of the season.  The young guys just have to adjust. I mean getting completely shut down for 5 post season games has to wear on them. If it doesn’t, then we were never built to win. 
    • Right now the 2025 OF has three LHH OF in Cowser, Mullins, and Kjerstad. I’m not sure what the bench makeup of this team will be, but it looks like we’ll need 1-2 RHH options.  We could bring Slater back on a small “Tony Kemp” like 1 year deal or a milb deal.  With Santander leaving, and Mateo back to being in the CF mix once healthy, do we go with a more COF RHH type? Trades are a possibility as well, but here is a list of upcoming RHH OF Free Agents,    
    • I actually didn't suggest a reliever as the return, that was SG. I was thinking more about trading veterans to acquire pitching prospects, probably lower level lottery tickets. I'd rather pick up ML roster pieces through free agency (assuming of course that Rubenstein will allow a significant payroll boost.).
    • Each player is different. Each player may have a somewhat different hitting philosophy, based on their strengths and weaknesses. Not everyone is a “power hitter.” I would not coach a Tony Santander the same as a Jordan Westburg, or a Jorge Mateo, or a Cedric Mullins. Some should be more selective, while others may need to do more damage and it’s ok for them to K more because the power payoff is worth it. Some should have a more oppo approach, while others may need to try to pull the ball more. The Waltimore certainly has messed with many of our RH bats.  Being a hitting coach is a lot of work, and it is usually not often a position held for many years. They seem to often be a scapegoat when the players do not hit. I wonder what drove the players to swing more at pitches they probably should not have. I seriously doubt it was Ryan Fuller. Hitting coaches have a general philosophical approach, like Fuller would have hitters learn to take pitches they cannot hit well, with less than 2 strikes.. He wanted them to swing only at pitches they can do damage with. They do not dramatically change. For the Orioles to become much more free swinging, that must have driven Fuller to leave. So be it. Going forward, they probably need to be somewhere in between the previous two years. In the playoffs, they get pitched to differently. It’s higher intensity. You have to be proficient in putting the ball in play. You have to be able to take what the game gives you, and execute. There is no excuse for repeatedly having runners in scoring position with less than two outs and repeatedly not being able to get them home. Bases loaded, no outs, hitters 2,3 and 4 coming up…we have to score there. The approach was to hit a grand slam. Awful baseball. A ton of talent on this roster, and something has to change. 
    • I have been pretty happy with Kjerstad's defense in the outfield corners.   Not that I want him in left at home.     I agree with what Elias said about Mayo's body type being more suited for 1B.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...