Jump to content

Will Castillo opt out?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Not really fair to him.  Early in his career he was a slightly above average framer.  His framing ability has declined along with the rest of his defensive skill set.

  • 2009 +29
  • 2010 +39
  • 2011 +25
  • 2012 -31
  • 2013 -81
  • 2014 -11
  • 2015 -65
  • 2016 -55
  • 2017 -86

Yeah, maybe not fair to him early on his career. But certainly fell off a cliff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think we'd be fine with Joseph and Pena to start 2018 with. Sisco and Wynns can start the season in AAA. 

Spend the Castillo money elsewhere. I'm not down on Sisco, just let him be the starting C in Norfolk for a few more months. Like June 1st, when we would get the extra year of control of him plus he'd be cheaper in arbitration. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I think we'd be fine with Joseph and Pena to start 2018 with. Sisco and Wynns can start the season in AAA. 

Spend the Castillo money elsewhere. I'm not down on Sisco, just let him be the starting C in Norfolk for a few more months. Like June 1st, when we would get the extra year of control of him plus he'd be cheaper in arbitration. 

Cheaper in arbitration?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Cheaper in arbitration?

Well more valuable in team cost and control if we wait till June 1st, but would be more costly in Arb. 7 years vs 6. If he's a productive MLB player then that means he won't hit FA until he's 30. 

Nobody here is an expert at the whole keeping a prospect down to start a season or keep him down until June 1. Why?  Because we haven't had to worry about that to start a season in a long time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MDtransplant757 said:

Top 3 should be extended IMO. Jones though....IDK. If Santander does well in Norfolk and we don't get rid of Trumbo, then the outfield and 40 man are clusters. 

Honestly (Don't shoot me here) I think we keep Wade Miley for $9 million next year. Less shopping that DD has to do. 

Miley's option is $12 Million, not $9 Million. $500K buyout, so it would cost $11.5 Million to exercise his option. It's not happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MurphDogg said:

Miley's option is $12 Million, not $9 Million. $500K buyout, so it would cost $11.5 Million to exercise his option. It's not happening.

That's all good and fine until you realize that Duquette was perfectly content paying $9m (Gallardo) in 2016 (and $11m in 2017) for an arm that was barely hanging on by a thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

That's all good and fine until you realize that Duquette was perfectly content paying $9m (Gallardo) in 2016 (and $11m in 2017) for an arm that was barely hanging on by a thread.

Ubaldo and Gallardo were both coming off of career years. Not so with Miley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think:

1) Castillo does not exercise the option

2) I don't want him back.   I agree with Frobby, it appears that most of our pitchers do significantly better with Joseph behind the plate.   If each starter had the "Joseph ERA" instead of the ERA that he has, I think we would probably be a wild card right now.   I don't trust the stat fully but where there's smoke there's fire and there's an awful lot of smoke here.   Some of the differences are stunning, especially with our starters who have control issues.

3) I am willing to start next year with Joseph/Wynn while waiting for Cisco to be ready.   If you want to bring in a veteran to back up Joseph, I'm OK with that too.   You shake a tree every offseason and a bunch of Hundley's, Chirinos's, and Hanigan's fall out.   And they don't cost a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bpilktree said:

That tells me more that the starters have no idea where the ball is going.  The one guy that actually seems to be able to locate a fastball is doing better because when the catcher calls the pitch on the inside he can actually throw it there.  What we need is more guys that can actually throw the ball were it is called.  I haven't had much complaints about the pitch that either catcher calls but more that the pitchers can't throw it were they are calling it. 

Really?   If it's about the starters only, why do they do so much better with Joseph?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Ubaldo and Gallardo were both coming off of career years. Not so with Miley.

Well, it was 1/2 a good season with Ubaldo. The first half of 2012 was pedestrian (4.50 ERA), the second half was fantastic (1.82 ERA). Which therein lies the rub. He was poor in 2011. So Duquette bought high.

As for Gallardo, he faltered in the second half of 2015 to the tune of 4.69 ERA...and there were rumblings of potential arm issues. And then our doctors threw up the red flag on him...and he still signed him.

He had an out on Gallardo. Which is the most frustrating thing in all of this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...