Jump to content

Trade Machado, Schoop......


vab

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Buck built World Series Championship teams for the New York Yankees, Arizona Diamondbacks and Texas Rangers.  The problem was, Buck was never around to see the teams that he built actually win the World Series.  In each case, Buck was fired and his successor enjoyed the fruits of Buck’s labor.

Buck is a manager that can build a culture, but can't finish the deal. It has happened 3 times. That cannot be a coincidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORIOLE33 said:

Buck is a manager that can build a culture, but can't finish the deal. It has happened 3 times. That cannot be a coincidence.

A younger Buck built teams that went on to win WS. He was fired because he was too much a micro manager to maintain a good clubhouse environment. Clearly he has grown in that regard, He has a great club house here, and as a GM he wouldn't be managing  the team day to day. I feel confident that he could quickly build a competitive team Also he is the best bet among G's would would work for PA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cumberbundy said:

GM Buck would make me very happy. He seems like a guy who would thrive in the position he loves watching the lower level guys & he knows the game as well as just about anyone. I want Buck to be with the O's for a long time. 

I think he is too loyal to his guys.

Do we want to see a repeat of O'Day and Davis when Jones comes up for free agency?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See if you can sign Schoop to an extension BEFORE you make the big pitch to Manny this offseason.   And then trade Manny if we cannot sign him.   But I am keeping Schoop either way.   But, in reality, I think Manny is going to go through free agency at this point (Schoop or not, our offer or not).   I advocated for trading him last winter, but, clearly, we did not and have had this pennant winning season..oops, sorry...  I realize second guessing is easy and it would have been very high wire risk taking to do it last winter, but the fact is his value now is much, much less than it would have been then and the return trade value clock continues to just be ticking away.   If it gets to the trade deadline next year, we will be lucky to get any decent prospects in return because teams will know that we are over the proverbial barrel.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I think he is too loyal to his guys.

Do we want to see a repeat of O'Day and Davis when Jones comes up for free agency?

Maybe I'm too loyal to Buck. ? 

I was unaware of his involvement in the Davis deal. I love AJ but wanted to trade him at the deadline if he could have brought back anything decent. I'm in the trade or extend guys a year too early camp. I would have tried to sign Manny for 10 years while he was recovering from knee surgery and I wanted to trade Tillman 4 years ago which would have cost us our playoff run. I can't stand the idea of paying for past production. Loyalty means being there for guys off the field not helping keep them on it longer, imo. These are my considerations from here, but if looking a guy I cared for in the face....we'd still be paying Sam Horn to play first base. I can talk tough about deals here, but I'd never be worse than Buck which is probably why I like him so much. Corn just made me put myself on the couch. What is this, inception ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

See if you can sign Schoop to an extension BEFORE you make the big pitch to Manny this offseason.   And then trade Manny if we cannot sign him.   But I am keeping Schoop either way.   But, in reality, I think Manny is going to go through free agency at this point (Schoop or not, our offer or not).   I advocated for trading him last winter, but, clearly, we did not and have had this pennant winning season..oops, sorry...  I realize second guessing is easy and it would have been very high wire risk taking to do it last winter, but the fact is his value now is much, much less than it would have been then and the return trade value clock continues to just be ticking away.   If it gets to the trade deadline next year, we will be lucky to get any decent prospects in return because teams will know that we are over the proverbial barrel.    

Corn knows we are losing Manny for a draft pick. I got a head start on coping with this reality when he broke it down pre-mlb draft. It's both unbelievable & the most Orioles thing ever. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't have a feeling one way or another.

My guess (and it's just a guess) is that he would rather sign Jones, and I have no problem with him if that is the way he feels, but as a GM, you can't act on feelings like that, and that's why I want him to just be the manager.  That's what he does best - as well as pretty much anyone in the world.  There are different skills and traits that work for a manager but not sessinarily for a GM.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ruzious said:

My guess (and it's just a guess) is that he would rather sign Jones, and I have no problem with him if that is the way he feels, but as a GM, you can't act on feelings like that, and that's why I want him to just be the manager.  That's what he does best - as well as pretty much anyone in the world.  There are different skills and traits that work for a manager but not sessinarily for a GM.  

Obviously he's not such a great manager if he is so loyal. Or maybe that "loyalty" isn't such a big deal, or maybe it's just patience and wisdom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, El Gordo said:

Obviously he's not such a great manager if he is so loyal. Or maybe that "loyalty" isn't such a big deal, or maybe it's just patience and wisdom.

Interesting - what's obvious to you makes no sense to me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...