Jump to content

Bigdomke1


bigdomke1

Recommended Posts

Sometimes I wish we could stop relitigating the wisdom of the Davis contract, and just focus on what we can hope to get out of Davis the next few years and exactly what's wrong with him.

Taken in isolation, a .744 OPS season with above average defense isn't the end of the world.   But for me, the really worrisome issue is Davis' inability to pull the trigger and swing at pitches that obviously are strikes.    It was a bit of a problem last year, but a much bigger problem this year.   I'm not sure I see how it can get better.   I'd like to hope he can bounce back but to be honest I'm not that hopeful.    As between him and Trumbo, I think Trumbo has a better chance of a rebound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply
33 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Sometimes I wish we could stop relitigating the wisdom of the Davis contract, and just focus on what we can hope to get out of Davis the next few years and exactly what's wrong with him.

Taken in isolation, a .744 OPS season with above average defense isn't the end of the world.   But for me, the really worrisome issue is Davis' inability to pull the trigger and swing at pitches that obviously are strikes.    It was a bit of a problem last year, but a much bigger problem this year.   I'm not sure I see how it can get better.   I'd like to hope he can bounce back but to be honest I'm not that hopeful.    As between him and Trumbo, I think Trumbo has a better chance of a rebound.

I wonder if there has been anything diagnosed like the yips in MLB, but for batting? Someone, maybe even Dave Johnson on some postgame radio show, that Davis has seemed like an automatic out for some time now. 

It's really sad how many teams have passed us in the WC race in the last week. The only positive I have today is that I bought a new baseball glove today, my first new one in 18 years. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we traded for Trumbo, that should have been it for Davis. When Trumbo became a FA and we had Mancini, that should have been it for Trumbo. Either one of them by themselves, without the other or Mancini would not have been so bad. Having two expensive players around when we have someone who can do it for cheap is the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/12/2017 at 9:28 PM, bigdomke1 said:

I've got a crazy idea, and would love some input. What if we traded Davis for a solid starter. Mancini could take 1st base. Defense would take a small hit, but the rotation would improve offense should be a push, and money could be banked for machado. Then trade trumBo for another solid starter. Beckham could dh, with JJ at shortsop. We now would have the money to keep Machado, have a rotation that wouldn't be the laughing stock of mlb, and I think, the potential to win a string of championships. Let me know if I'm nuts.

You asked for it. You're nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wonder what happened to Chris.. I mean he looks like he doesn't have a clue at the plate anymore. He's totally guessing at pitches and that's why he's looking at so many strike 3 pitches. He's just so unproductive at the plate, it's really hard to watch anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MDK02 said:

I just wonder what happened to Chris.. I mean he looks like he doesn't have a clue at the plate anymore. He's totally guessing at pitches and that's why he's looking at so many strike 3 pitches. He's just so unproductive at the plate, it's really hard to watch anymore.

Extremely hard to watch.  I feel bad for the guy.  He's a lost soul up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we need to remember that, for all his struggles, Davis has a .744 OPS for the season.    That's awful for a guy making $23 mm/yr, and very subpar for a 1B, but it's not minor league material.   There are several 1B in the league who are worse.     It's the salary and the optics of the called strikeouts that make it seem worse than it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Frobby said:

Sometimes I wish we could stop relitigating the wisdom of the Davis contract, and just focus on what we can hope to get out of Davis the next few years and exactly what's wrong with him.

Taken in isolation, a .744 OPS season with above average defense isn't the end of the world.   But for me, the really worrisome issue is Davis' inability to pull the trigger and swing at pitches that obviously are strikes.    It was a bit of a problem last year, but a much bigger problem this year.   I'm not sure I see how it can get better.   I'd like to hope he can bounce back but to be honest I'm not that hopeful.    As between him and Trumbo, I think Trumbo has a better chance of a rebound.

But isn't this year more like Trumbo then the previous year? 

2014- 14 hrs,61 RBI's only 362 AB's.

2015- 22 hrs, 64 RB''s.

Since 2014 he has been average except for last year. He is also going to be 32, 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

But isn't this year more like Trumbo then the previous year? 

2014- 14 hrs,61 RBI's only 362 AB's.

2015- 22 hrs, 64 RB''s.

Since 2014 he has been average except for last year. He is also going to be 32, 

 

 

Davis is also going to be 32.    I'm not saying I think a bounce back by Trumbo is highly likely, I'm just saying I like his chances better than Davis'.   And the reason I like his chances better is that he's not having a problem getting the bat off his shoulder or identifying pitches in the way Davis is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with Frobby, at this point there is no reason to debate trading CD or his contract because it ain't happening. My only hope- and I am probably grasping at straws- is that he has a history of being very hot or very cold, and this is a prolonged cold spell. Unlikely, but I'm hoping he gets his groove back, because he isn't going anywhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...