Jump to content

JJ Cooper of Baseball America on Hays, Sisco and how the O's may have 5 on the 100 list by mid season


wildcard

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Frobby said:

I certainly believe in Harvey, if healthy.    I’m in “show me” mode with DJ Hall.    I hope he justifies Cooper’s high opinion of him.   

DJ Hall looks good. Sedlock could bounce back if they let him pitch like he did in college. Guy I was high on was Alex Faedo, who went to the Tigers last draft. That dude is a stud. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
27 minutes ago, MDtransplant757 said:

DJ Hall looks good. Sedlock could bounce back if they let him pitch like he did in college. Guy I was high on was Alex Faedo, who went to the Tigers last draft. That dude is a stud. 

Again, I've written this before, but I'll repeat, the Orioles didn't change his delivery.  They are working to change it back actually.  I'm harsh on the team when it's deserved, I'm pretty confident it wasn't their fault in this case.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Call me when we get an Acuna/Vlad Jr. talent.

These guys are good but they can easily bomb, too.

I thought this was a little if not even pretty harsh. But then I thought about it and looked at BA's top 100 list. 

Braves 8
Brewers 6
Padres 6
Rays 6
Yankees 6
Phillies 5
Reds 5
Twins 5
White Sox 5
Astros 4
Athletics 4
Blue Jays 4
Cardinals 4
Dodgers 4
Angels 3
Orioles 3

 

It's good that the Orioles are on the list, not every team is represented, but the Orioles are still a middle of the road maybe just above average/median in most respects. The minor league system seems to have improved, but it would be nice if the O's could move up this list, substantially. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

I thought this was a little if not even pretty harsh. But then I thought about it and looked at BA's top 100 list. 

Braves 8
Brewers 6
Padres 6
Rays 6
Yankees 6
Phillies 5
Reds 5
Twins 5
White Sox 5
Astros 4
Athletics 4
Blue Jays 4
Cardinals 4
Dodgers 4
Angels 3
Orioles 3

 

It's good that the Orioles are on the list, not every team is represented, but the Orioles are still a middle of the road maybe just above average/median in most respects. The minor league system seems to have improved, but it would be nice if the O's could move up this list, substantially. 

Well, it was meant to be harsh.

There's value in getting guys that you can count on to play day in and day out but aren't All-Stars, there's no doubt about that.  But when the Orioles refuse to play heavily in international waters and miss out on guys like an Acuna or a Vlad Jr, well...I've got an issue and fans should be harsh.  When you see franchises like the Phillies, Reds and Brewers have higher rankings...it's like, come on...

Even setting that aside, this is as good as the Orioles system can hope to do.  I can't even remember the last time any publication, anywhere had the Orioles system ranked in the top 10.  It just doesn't happen.  Might have been way back when Wieters was an exciting prospect but that's all I can think of.

On top of that, I think we, as a fanbase, overrate our prospects.  This is probably selective memory but I think we were hyping the guys in "The Calvary" 9_9 more than anyone else.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well harsh sometimes is honest.  But, honestly it is good to be mentioned at all with 3 and the fact that they readily admit that there are others who were in the conversation represents improvement.  Just imagine how good we could do if we could play in the international market.....

But I will take the good news unfiltered.  Then simply ask for more!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

 

Even setting that aside, this is as good as the Orioles system can hope to do.  I can't even remember the last time any publication, anywhere had the Orioles system ranked in the top 10.  It just doesn't happen.  Might have been way back when Wieters was an exciting prospect but that's all I can think of.

Baseball America had the system ranked 8th in 2010 and 9th in 2009. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Well, it was meant to be harsh.

There's value in getting guys that you can count on to play day in and day out but aren't All-Stars, there's no doubt about that.  But when the Orioles refuse to play heavily in international waters and miss out on guys like an Acuna or a Vlad Jr, well...I've got an issue and fans should be harsh.  When you see franchises like the Phillies, Reds and Brewers have higher rankings...it's like, come on...

Even setting that aside, this is as good as the Orioles system can hope to do.  I can't even remember the last time any publication, anywhere had the Orioles system ranked in the top 10.  It just doesn't happen.  Might have been way back when Wieters was an exciting prospect but that's all I can think of.

On top of that, I think we, as a fanbase, overrate our prospects.  This is probably selective memory but I think we were hyping the guys in "The Calvary" 9_9 more than anyone else.  

Sir,

I believe the Orioles manager was responsible for that moniker and the media ran crazy with it, and yes, the fans loved it, we sucked, it was faint hope at best, that there was light at the end of a very dark tunnel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luke-OH said:

Yep, I posted in one thread that the Orioles system is the strongest it's been since the period after the Bedard trade (IMO).

Can't even build it right on our own, we've gotta trade a pitcher and get 5 back to get ranked that high.

1 hour ago, MurphDogg said:

Baseball America had the system ranked 8th in 2010 and 9th in 2009. 

Entirely too long.  Especially with the money and the resources that we have.  It's naive to think that we can always be a top 10 system but it's been almost 10 years since we were last considered one.  That's a joke.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

Sir,

I believe the Orioles manager was responsible for that moniker and the media ran crazy with it, and yes, the fans loved it, we sucked, it was faint hope at best, that there was light at the end of a very dark tunnel.

Maybe he was but those guys just weren't that great.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Well, it was meant to be harsh.

There's value in getting guys that you can count on to play day in and day out but aren't All-Stars, there's no doubt about that.  But when the Orioles refuse to play heavily in international waters and miss out on guys like an Acuna or a Vlad Jr, well...I've got an issue and fans should be harsh.  When you see franchises like the Phillies, Reds and Brewers have higher rankings...it's like, come on...

Even setting that aside, this is as good as the Orioles system can hope to do.  I can't even remember the last time any publication, anywhere had the Orioles system ranked in the top 10.  It just doesn't happen.  Might have been way back when Wieters was an exciting prospect but that's all I can think of.

On top of that, I think we, as a fanbase, overrate our prospects.  This is probably selective memory but I think we were hyping the guys in "The Calvary" 9_9 more than anyone else.  

I'm pretty sure it was a church group that was hyping the Calvary.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BirdinBama said:

I was just thinking, which is a dangerous thing. Our system has been much maligned, but then I think about Manny, Mancini, Schoop, Bundy, Gausman....all products of our system. Is it that bad?

Three of those names were top five picks.  While of course it is possible to miss with picks that high your odds are better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MDtransplant757 said:

DJ Hall looks good. Sedlock could bounce back if they let him pitch like he did in college. Guy I was high on was Alex Faedo, who went to the Tigers last draft. That dude is a stud. 

Quote

I certainly believe in Harvey, if healthy.    I’m in “show me” mode with DJ Hall.    I hope he justifies Cooper’s high opinion of him.   

Gentlemen, the man's name is DL Hall, not DJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...