Jump to content

It's Official


Uli2001

Recommended Posts

For the first time this year, the Orioles have to go above .500 the rest of the way to avoid losing 100 games.

At 24-61, they need to go at least 39-38 to avoid losing 100 games for the first time since the Reagan administration. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Not going to happen.  Especially if Manny and others get traded.

They have only won 1 of their last 10 games.  Do you think Manny being on the team really makes a difference?  We are 18 1/2 games behind the Rays.  The Marlins have 12 more wins than us.  These are teams that traded away their best players.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, atomic said:

They have only won 1 of their last 10 games.  Do you think Manny being on the team really makes a difference?  We are 18 1/2 games behind the Rays.  The Marlins have 12 more wins than us.  These are teams that traded away their best players.  

Good point, but this offense might average less than 2 runs a game if Manny, Jones and Valencia are traded.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Good point, but this offense might average less than 2 runs a game if Manny, Jones and Valencia are traded.  

Yeah but the defense will improve.  Bring up Mullins and Stewart plus anything we get in trade. I don't see the team being any worse.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, atomic said:

They have only won 1 of their last 10 games.  Do you think Manny being on the team really makes a difference?  We are 18 1/2 games behind the Rays.  The Marlins have 12 more wins than us.  These are teams that traded away their best players.  

Each loss will count for two after Manny leaves. It’s kind of like lapping yourself in a race to the bottom. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be only the third 100+ loss season since the franchise moved to Baltimore in 1954.  From 2001-2011, the Orioles lost 91+ games 9 times in 11 seasons, including two seasons of 98 losses.  100 losses isn't much of a stretch from those years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

This would be only the third 100+ loss season since the franchise moved to Baltimore in 1954.  From 2001-2011, the Orioles lost 91+ games 9 times in 11 seasons, including two seasons of 98 losses.  100 losses isn't much of a stretch from those years.

Yes, but when you need to play winning baseball just to avoid 100 losses, and there are 77 games left, you know they are likely to lose way more than 100. That's the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Uli2001 said:

Yes, but when you need to play winning baseball just to avoid 100 losses, and there are 77 games left, you know they are likely to lose way more than 100. That's the point.

I get that, which is why I said a few weeks ago, if this team doesn't start playing close to .500 baseball, they'll end up with more losses than the 1988 team (107).
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

I get that, which is why I said a few weeks ago, if this team doesn't start playing close to .500 baseball, they'll end up with more losses than the 1988 team (107).

They are already 2 games behind 1988 teams pace and the 1988 team won their next 3 games.  Amazingly if you even removed Chris Davis stats from the team the position players would still have negative WAR.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

100 losses? Hey, they won't even win 55 games...maybe not even 50..especially with Manny and Britton and Brach likely gone after July....

I think Brach and Britton leaving will be more of a negative than Manny leaving.  You will have lost O'Day, Brach, Britton and Bleier from the bullpen.  That leaves you Castro.  I think if a starter wants to win they have to go a minimum of 8 innings.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I mean, I don't want to denigrate your experience, but I think you're underestimating the power potential of elite athletes.  The leg strength required to send a grown man 20 mph from a dead stop is the same leg strength required to do a deadlift, or do a squat.  Can your buddy run a 4.5 40?
    • The Orioles were 30-16 in one-run games in 2023. They are 6-6 this year so far. Orioles magic hasn’t been there this year, at least so far. What changed?
    • I can’t even believe the grasping of straws going on here.  Why don’t we just bring up every guy at Norfolk who has an .800+ OPS, since they’re obviously better than their major league counterparts?  Oh wait, everyone at Norfolk has an .800+ OPS! As to Mullins, yes he’s looked awful at the plate for a month, but the O’s are nowhere near the point of regularly benching him or pinch hitting for him in key situations vs. RHP.   You know why?   Because even good players have slumps, and the best way to get them out of it is to keep playing them until they emerge from them.  And Mullins has a long enough track record where the odds of him coming out of this eventually are decent.  Not 100%, but a lot more likely than not.  I mean, the guy had an .859 OPS the first 3 weeks of the season.  That guy didn’t have some instantaneous physical decline that has turned him into the second coming of Chris Davis permanently.  I know it’s frustrating to watch him right now.  I’m as frustrated as anyone.   But every major league team would be doing what the Orioles have been doing, for another 4-6 weeks at a minimum.  
    • But it doesn't really matter if correlation implies causation, because we can at least infer that people with fast 40 times have a good chance of being able to squat 2.5x their body weight, regardless of whether there is a causative relationship.  And we have verifiable data thay many football players at skill positions are able to squat large amounts of weight that would be out of reach of many other people even given the same amount of training and diet.  So with both if these things in hand we can safely assume that these lifting numbers are achievable for most elite athletes, which Holliday qualifies as.  So I don't think we should be shocked or skeptical that he's able to pull these numbers.    I'd also be shocked if there wasn't a causative relationship between 40 times and lifting heavy.  Lifting large amounts of weight requires powerful muscles in the legs.  Running really fast also requires powerful muscles in the legs.  You can get in the weeds about muscle fiber type but to me if you're good at one, there's a great chance thay you're at least moderately good at the other.
    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...