Jump to content

Duquette in mix for Mets new GM


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Interesting development.    I do think that the O’s should make up their mind whether they want to retain Duquette, and have discussions with him before the season’s over.    Not necessarily right now.   

If I was asking someone to dismantle my team for prospects.  I think I would have had that conversation already....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 minutes ago, foxfield said:

If I was asking someone to dismantle my team for prospects.  I think I would have had that conversation already....

Not if you are just selling the team and your main goal is to cut as much salary from the books and you don't want to sign any GM to a deal beyond this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, atomic said:

If DD has other options why wouldn't he take them?  He could get a 4 year deal and by the time the deal ends he would be retirement age.  

He doesn’t have other options while he’s still under contact here.   He can’t talk to the Mets or anyone else right now.    And if the O’s offer him an extension he has to weigh taking the sure thing versus hoping he’ll get a better offer elsewhere, which may or may not happen.    Not an easy decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

He doesn’t have other options while he’s still under contact here.   He can’t talk to the Mets or anyone else right now.    And if the O’s offer him an extension he has to weigh taking the sure thing versus hoping he’ll get a better offer elsewhere, which may or may not happen.    Not an easy decision.

I think we know that won't stop Dan.

Unless you think he didn't talk to the Blue Jays while under contract?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

He doesn’t have other options while he’s still under contact here.   He can’t talk to the Mets or anyone else right now.    And if the O’s offer him an extension he has to weigh taking the sure thing versus hoping he’ll get a better offer elsewhere, which may or may not happen.    Not an easy decision.

The contract could already be signed with a future date on the top of it for all we know.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think we know that won't stop Dan.

Unless you think he didn't talk to the Blue Jays while under contract?

I think he probably didn’t.   But there likely was some indirect communication.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

 I think he probably didn’t.   But there likely was some indirect communication.    

Of course he talked to them.  Why would we be negotiating with the Blue Jays for compensation if they hadn't contacted him about the job?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, atomic said:

The contract could already be signed with a future date on the top of it for all we know.  

Contract with who, another team?   Pretty sure that would be a blatant violation of MLB Rules.     I think that’s the last thing DD would do with all he’s been through.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Contract with who, another team?   Pretty sure that would be a blatant violation of MLB Rules.     I think that’s the last thing DD would do with all he’s been through.   

As long as he doesn't make any trades with the Mets no one is going to care.  He is unemployed for next season of course he is going to interview with other teams if they want him to.  Pretty naive to think he isn't looking for future employment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, atomic said:

Of course he talked to them.  Why would we be negotiating with the Blue Jays for compensation if they hadn't contacted him about the job?

The rule is that if someone is under contract, the team that wants to hire them has to ask permission to speak with them.    Toronto never asked before their interest in Duquette became public.   I think they played footsie but never actually spoke.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, atomic said:

As long as he doesn't make any trades with the Mets no one is going to care.  He is unemployed for next season of course he is going to interview with other teams if they want him to.  Pretty naive to think he isn't looking for future employment. 

I think you’re very wrong.    Teams aren’t allowed to talk with free agent players before their contracts expire, and the same applies to front office personnel, managers and coaches.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...