Jump to content

Either overhaul the starting pitching development staff, or stop burning high draft picks on pitchers


FanSince88

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Good points.

Which is why I am going to advocate for my previous idea of selecting nothing but pitchers.  100% pitchers, every round, 3 years in a row. 40 rounds in the MLB draft x 3 years = 120 new pitchers in our system.  

I'm not sure what we'll do for positional players but we we can have some of the pitchers play in the field when they're not pitching.  They only have to make a few throws a game, it shouldn't be any significant wear and tear.  How many chances does a 3rd baseman get in a game, 6 or 7 max?  No problem.  Just think of it as long toss on an off-day.  Same with the pitchers in the outfield.  And if they pitched the day before they get put at first base where they don't have to make any throws.  

Think how awesome it'll be.  Just pitchers drafted.  Our minor league teams will have never ending bullpens.  We won't have to scramble to find pitching depth because every team from Bowie to Delmarva will have nothing but pitchers.  120 pitchers!  Some will HAVE TO pan out. 

Someone blows out their elbow and needs Tommy John?  No problem!  We got plenty more where that came from!  

How many minor league teams would we need to keep 120 new pitchers busy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Finisher said:

He was excellent that year but it's actually pretty surprising how average he was the rest of his career.

2005 - 2009 ERA+ 108, 120, 146, 116, 151. That's pretty good. Unfortunately for Seattle, those last two years were basically half seasons. He would have had a longer run, but injuries...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gausman has produced more than you would expect, with 2 full years + rest of this season remaining of pre-FA time, from a 75 FV pitching prospect.  I think pitching is really hard over long periods, and coaching pitchers/keeping them healthy is really hard.

The Orioles suck at developing pitchers.  But no one is particularly good at it other than maybe the Braves, and the O’s have had some moderate successes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple years ago things were looking up on this front. In the second half of '16 Gausman was awesome, Bundy held his own in his first half-season of starting, and we didn't know Tillman's reverse-metamorphosis was beginning.

I remember the optimism going into last year that we had just made the playoffs with a pretty poor rotation that figured to get better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've already overhauled the development process, but when most 18 year olds don't see the majors until 21-23, you are going to have to wait and see for 3-5 years of those changes are worth it.  

Someone posted an article on here a few weeks ago about how our philosophy on drafting pitching has changed since signing John Wasdin as our director of pitching (or similar title.)  He did a lot of work as a pitching coach in the Athletics organization after wrapping up his career, and learned from one of the best saber metric organizations about drafting and developing pitching.  That is why our last two drafts have been graded pretty well from the start.  And like I said, to see this through, you have to wait 3-5 years before the fruits of this changed philosophy have made it to the majors.  

I do wish we would stop three things: 

1.) Eliminating pitches from being thrown.  Let the pitchers pitch.  Having no one with a cutter is ridiculous.  

2.) Get rid of the cookie cutter minimalist wind-up.  Let a pitcher's windup work for them.  

3.) Stop speeding pitchers up with the lsidestep.  Teach it as a tool, not the primary way to approach things.  Hardly anyone steals anymore, so why put such an emphasis on it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first Orioles draft with the current leadership in the Warehouse was 2011, I believe.  In that June draft 791 Pitchers were drafted.  Of those 791 Pitchers only 152 have played in the MLB Show.  Of those 152 pitchers the highest Accumulated W.A.R. is held by Gerritt Cole at 16.0. 

The following year has 630 pitchers drafted.  Of those 102 have made the Show.  Alex Wood has the highest accumulated W.A.R. at 12.0

In 2013, 653 Drafted Pitchers, 91 made the Show, Sean Manaea has an Accumulated W.A.R. of 7.0

Would these three high WAR Pitchers per draft be considered ACES or Number Ones on their Staffs???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hallas said:

Gausman has produced more than you would expect, with 2 full years + rest of this season remaining of pre-FA time, from a 75 FV pitching prospect.  I think pitching is really hard over long periods, and coaching pitchers/keeping them healthy is really hard.

The Orioles suck at developing pitchers.  But no one is particularly good at it other than maybe the Braves, and the O’s have had some moderate successes.

The Rays have developed quite a few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, thezeroes said:

The first Orioles draft with the current leadership in the Warehouse was 2011, I believe.  In that June draft 791 Pitchers were drafted.  Of those 791 Pitchers only 152 have played in the MLB Show.  Of those 152 pitchers the highest Accumulated W.A.R. is held by Gerritt Cole at 16.0. 

The following year has 630 pitchers drafted.  Of those 102 have made the Show.  Alex Wood has the highest accumulated W.A.R. at 12.0

In 2013, 653 Drafted Pitchers, 91 made the Show, Sean Manaea has an Accumulated W.A.R. of 7.0

Would these three high WAR Pitchers per draft be considered ACES or Number Ones on their Staffs???

Great post!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...