Jump to content

A crazy idea - Felix Hernandez


BohKnowsBmore

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Barnaby Graves said:

Take all the guys who were good for 6 years or so, and then have been declining for 2 years.  In one pile stack up the ones that recovered to 80%+ of their former greatness the next year, and in the other pile the rest.  Which pile is bigger, and by how much?  And what is the discount needed to make that bet worth it?

The shelf life on a professional baseball player is pretty short.  Same with other sports, with varying degrees of exceptions depending on the game.  It also seems greatly affected by the degree of PED policing.

I love the creative thinking but with the number of innings on this guy, and the trending, and the general talent deficit of the team, it's a no for me.  We need to give young talent the chance to compete in the ultimate minimum-pressure environment: where the opposition is toughest and the need to perform is nil.  Cause we won't win more than 60 for some time, it seems.

I both agree and disagree.  I think our young arms need to force their way onto the big club rather than a position being given to them.  As I mentioned above, part of the issue with the "Calvary" era (IMHO of course), was that there was almost no resistance on their path to the majors.  They sort of knew they would make it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

Most everyone in the media, national and local, and on this board seems to be in agreement that this team will not be very good next season.  They might be very very bad (I believe 2018 levels of bad to be unlikely, personally).  Simply put, this team is not going to compete in 2019.  The way the roster is structured going into next season needs to be thinking about how we can best position the team to be successful in 2020 and beyond.

That brings me to Felix Hernandez.  What does a former Cy Young who is pretty bad himself in 2018 have to do with the future of the Orioles? That's a great question.  First, a few statements that I believe to be fairly uncontroversial:

  • The Orioles payroll going into 2019 looks to be significantly lower than going into 2018
  • The Orioles have three definite starters at this point: Bundy, Cobb and Cashner
  • The Mariners have been in the hunt for the second WC for quite some time and have not gone away
  • The Mariners cannot be thrilled about owing Felix Hernandez $27MM for 2019
  • The Orioles and Mariners have dealt with each other with some level of frequency in the past

What if the Orioles took on Felix Hernandez, with the Mariners eating somewhere between $7MM and $13.5MM of his final year?  Additionally, the Mariners would send a B-ish prospect that falls on the back-end of their organizational top-10.  A guy like Juan Querecuto (SS in rookie ball) or Wyatt Mills (RHP in high A).

This would achieve a few things:

  • Continue to add more talent to the O's farm system for 2020 and beyond
  • Make use of newly-found payroll space to add assets
  • Give the team someone who at the very least will eat some innings
  • If he is somehow able to rebound to something like an  4.0 - 4.5 ERA innings eater, he may have some value at the deadline in 2019
  • The Mariners would have additional payroll flexibility to improve their team

Additionally, more veteran arms at the big club will make highly-regarded arms at the farm force their way up with play, rather than being handed a starting spot by default (something that hindered development of the "Calvary" IMO).

I realize that this type of deal is unlikely to happen, but I think it would be a creative way to leverage our position and add more talent to the team.

Now, go ahead and tell me why this is the worst idea ever.

No thank you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would the Orioles be trading? Either way, even if it's just a salary dump I don't think it makes sense for Baltimore. 

If they are in the market for some fringy innings eaters next year just sign them. Maybe they'll get lucky and flip an overachiever at the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

Most everyone in the media, national and local, and on this board seems to be in agreement that this team will not be very good next season.  They might be very very bad (I believe 2018 levels of bad to be unlikely, personally).  Simply put, this team is not going to compete in 2019.  The way the roster is structured going into next season needs to be thinking about how we can best position the team to be successful in 2020 and beyond.

That brings me to Felix Hernandez.  What does a former Cy Young who is pretty bad himself in 2018 have to do with the future of the Orioles? That's a great question.  First, a few statements that I believe to be fairly uncontroversial:

  • The Orioles payroll going into 2019 looks to be significantly lower than going into 2018
  • The Orioles have three definite starters at this point: Bundy, Cobb and Cashner
  • The Mariners have been in the hunt for the second WC for quite some time and have not gone away
  • The Mariners cannot be thrilled about owing Felix Hernandez $27MM for 2019
  • The Orioles and Mariners have dealt with each other with some level of frequency in the past

What if the Orioles took on Felix Hernandez, with the Mariners eating somewhere between $7MM and $13.5MM of his final year?  Additionally, the Mariners would send a B-ish prospect that falls on the back-end of their organizational top-10.  A guy like Juan Querecuto (SS in rookie ball) or Wyatt Mills (RHP in high A).

This would achieve a few things:

  • Continue to add more talent to the O's farm system for 2020 and beyond
  • Make use of newly-found payroll space to add assets
  • Give the team someone who at the very least will eat some innings
  • If he is somehow able to rebound to something like an  4.0 - 4.5 ERA innings eater, he may have some value at the deadline in 2019
  • The Mariners would have additional payroll flexibility to improve their team

Additionally, more veteran arms at the big club will make highly-regarded arms at the farm force their way up with play, rather than being handed a starting spot by default (something that hindered development of the "Calvary" IMO).

I realize that this type of deal is unlikely to happen, but I think it would be a creative way to leverage our position and add more talent to the team.

Now, go ahead and tell me why this is the worst idea ever.

Crazy idea. Camden Yards. Felix is not pitching for 600k. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Finisher said:

So we just traded away a borderline TOR arm and compromised his value by including a salary dump but now we're going to absorb an even worse salary dump to acquire some fringe prospect? Real teams don't give away prospects to salary dump, they just eat the contract and move on.

Gausman was never a borderline TOR arm.  He goes on these runs where he looks like he could turn into an ace.  Then a month later, he looks like a very replaceable #5.  I think his pitch repertoire is too limited to ever be an ace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Blue Jay's did this when they took on Francisco Liriano's contract from the pirates a few years ago.  Along with taking Liriano they took back mid level prospects Harold Ramirez, an outfielder who hit .320/.365./.471 for AA at age 23 and Reese McGuire, a catcher, and September call up this year who is likely a depth piece. 

I dont know if Felix is the guy you do this with but this type of maneuver should certainly be in the bag of tricks to acquire more talent going forward.

Oh, and Liriano also got them Teoscar Hernandez when he was traded.  Not bad for using empty payroll space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 297 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online


  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...