Jump to content

Do the O's even name a MVO this year?


Santandah

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TonySoprano said:

Exactly.  They'll give it to him as a going away present.   Book it.  They can't give it to ManNY because the rule is the player has to be present to receive the award.  Mancini should get it, but won't. 

I do agree that the award should be given to someone who has been below replacement level this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I guess if you go by the theory that the MVO should be the player who is most responsible for wherever the team ends up, then you have to go with Davis.  He has IMO contributed the most to our 42-105 record.  Put another way, if you stuck a player's face in the record book next to each season, he would be the face of the 2018 season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I do agree that the award should be given to someone who has been below replacement level this season.

Well, according to Olbermann, that's Machado.?

OPS+ - Jones 104, Mancini 97.   There isn't anyone close to being a  "replacement level" pitcher left in the rotation.  MVO carries slightly less weight than an Orioles HOF'er.  There are ceremonies for both every season, deserving or not.  Besides...
giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By bb-ref's rWAR the team's best player who is still on the team (sort of) is Richard Bleier, at 1.6 WAR.  Among players on the active roster it's Villar at 1.6.

by fWAR, Fangraphs' flavor, the most valuable player who is still an Oriole is Mychal Givens, at 1.6.

I wonder, what is the modern record for lowest team-leading WAR total, among players still on the team at season's end?  The 43-win 2003 Tigers had Dmitri Young, worth 3.4 wins.  The '62 Mets had Roger Craig and Al Jackson at 3.0 rWAR, and Richie Ashburn and the other Frank Thomas over 2.0.  The 43-win 1915 A's had four players over 2.0 wins.  The 42-win '52 Pirates had a five and a four-win player.

The 1951 Browns didn't have a single position player over 1.2 WAR (Sherm Lollar) but had 5.6 win Ned Garver pitching.  He won 20 games for a 52-win team with absolutely no hitting.

Dave Bancroft was the only 1924 Brave to clear 1.0 win as a position player, but Jesse Barnes had a 5.3-win season on the mound.

Ah... here we go.  The 1915 Baltimore Terrapins, who went 47-107 in the Federal League before folding and ending up in a Supreme Court case.  Their best position player (by rWAR) was backup catcher Fred Jacklitsch at 1.3, and their best pitcher was one Rankin Johnson at 1.5.  They did have Jack Quinn (31 but would pitch about 15 more years in the majors and somebody should write a book about) who went 9-22, 3.45 but clocked in at just over 1.0 WAR.

So that's our goal: to try to have someone on the 2018 Orioles better than Rankin Johnson, a journeyman with 450 career innings mostly in a marginal third major league 113 years ago.  Mychal Givens will give it the ol' college try.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Santandah said:

Who should be named the Most Valuable Oriole for 2018?

I can't remember ever seeing a situation like this. In previous suck years, the Orioles always had at least someone who was worthy of being call the Most Valuable Oriole, be it Melvin Mora or Brian Roberts. There was always someone who at least had a moderately standout season.

This year's most valuable player is hands down Manny Machado, both statistically and more abstractly for what trading him meant for the team. (Regardless of what they got back, trading him marked the start of the sea change.) But they can't give the award to a guy no longer on the team.

Adam Jones on the other hand has had a league average season at the plate. Though he's shown no power. Was terrible in the field. And then made a me-first decision that the team sees as a detriment. (I support his right to not accept a trade, but it definitely pissed off the team.)

I guess one could make the case for Jonathan Villar. He's absolutely been the Orioles' best player since the trade. (And seems to fit the Mora mold. Baseball gods  help us if he is the best asset they ultimately get after the fire sale.) But has be been with the team long enough to get the award?

Outside of those three, who could it even be? Caleb Joseph?

Perhaps it'd be best to simply not give out the award at all.

Well written but "clown question",  bro.  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1899 Cleveland Spiders had one pitcher who finished with positive rWAR: Harry Lochhead.  Who was actually their starting shortstop.  He pitched one game of mopup relief where he allowed two unearned runs in 3 and 2/3rds innings, good for 0.1 rWAR.  The 14 other pitchers who appeared in the Spiders' uniform in '99 were all below replacement.

The team's MVP was a virtual dead heat between catcher/utilty guy Ossee Schrecongost, who was transferred in mid-season to their sister team in St. Louis because he was playing well, and 38-year-old backup catcher Chief Zimmer (.342 in 20 games).  Both notched 1.0 rWAR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ScGO's said:

Mike Wright, for finding a way to stay on the team the whole season.

This is outstanding.  He would have been outright released by any respectable organization in baseball.....but the Orioles....we LOVE HIM!  I had not looked at his career stats before now, but perhaps we value his tremendous consistency.  His season ERAs have been 6.04, 5.79, 5.76, and 5.79.  That is a hell of a narrow band. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

By bb-ref's rWAR the team's best player who is still on the team (sort of) is Richard Bleier, at 1.6 WAR.  Among players on the active roster it's Villar at 1.6.

by fWAR, Fangraphs' flavor, the most valuable player who is still an Oriole is Mychal Givens, at 1.6.

I wonder, what is the modern record for lowest team-leading WAR total, among players still on the team at season's end?  The 43-win 2003 Tigers had Dmitri Young, worth 3.4 wins.  The '62 Mets had Roger Craig and Al Jackson at 3.0 rWAR, and Richie Ashburn and the other Frank Thomas over 2.0.  The 43-win 1915 A's had four players over 2.0 wins.  The 42-win '52 Pirates had a five and a four-win player.

The 1951 Browns didn't have a single position player over 1.2 WAR (Sherm Lollar) but had 5.6 win Ned Garver pitching.  He won 20 games for a 52-win team with absolutely no hitting.

Dave Bancroft was the only 1924 Brave to clear 1.0 win as a position player, but Jesse Barnes had a 5.3-win season on the mound.

Ah... here we go.  The 1915 Baltimore Terrapins, who went 47-107 in the Federal League before folding and ending up in a Supreme Court case.  Their best position player (by rWAR) was backup catcher Fred Jacklitsch at 1.3, and their best pitcher was one Rankin Johnson at 1.5.  They did have Jack Quinn (31 but would pitch about 15 more years in the majors and somebody should write a book about) who went 9-22, 3.45 but clocked in at just over 1.0 WAR.

So that's our goal: to try to have someone on the 2018 Orioles better than Rankin Johnson, a journeyman with 450 career innings mostly in a marginal third major league 113 years ago.  Mychal Givens will give it the ol' college try.

 

For anyone interested in a little more about Quinn, without waiting for the book:

https://sabr.org/bioproj/person/cf88d73c

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I vote for Buck.  I still don't think he's come to terms with how bad this team is.  He bats Davis about every game in the 5th spot and stuck with Tillman way longer than he deserves.  He puts veterans over young players in almost every situation.  He's playing for every last win in a season that was over in early May.  He epitomizes this team better than any player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 297 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online



  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...