Jump to content

The Buck Showalter Appreciation Thread


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, VaBird1 said:

Not disagreeing, but asking.  Why?  Sample size?

Yes.

Exacerbating the problem is that pitchers can change pretty substantially over time.  A guy struggling against 2012 Ubaldo doesn't mean much when he's facing 2016 Ubaldo.  You are better served looking at how hitters do against pitch types.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yes.

Exacerbating the problem is that pitchers can change pretty substantially over time.  A guy struggling against 2012 Ubaldo doesn't mean much when he's facing 2016 Ubaldo.  You are better served looking at how hitters do against pitch types.

Gotcha. That’s what I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/4/2018 at 3:11 PM, Can_of_corn said:

Lots of folks were happy with the idea of trying to keep the competitive window open.

I hope they enjoy the next few seasons.

What's the difference if you're wandering in the wilderness in 2016 or 2019?  I was one of those happy to try to keep it open as long as possible after having lived through the 1998-2011 strategy of praying to get to .500 in 3, 4, 5 years and never making it.  I remember 0-21.  I remember 30-3.  It'll eventually come back around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

What's the difference if you're wandering in the wilderness in 2016 or 2019?  I was one of those happy to try to keep it open as long as possible after having lived through the 1998-2011 strategy of praying to get to .500 in 3, 4, 5 years and never making it.  I remember 0-21.  I remember 30-3.  It'll eventually come back around.

If you plan properly the down periods should be more infrequent and shorter in duration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

What's the difference if you're wandering in the wilderness in 2016 or 2019?  I was one of those happy to try to keep it open as long as possible after having lived through the 1998-2011 strategy of praying to get to .500 in 3, 4, 5 years and never making it.  I remember 0-21.  I remember 30-3.  It'll eventually come back around.

Same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

99 - 187 from the date that article was written.  .346 baseball turned Bucks overall winning percentage with the Orioles from .534 to .494.  I still have my Buckle Up towel and will remember those days fondly but I’ve turned the page.  Looks like ownership is doing the right things to turn the page as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JimGinSP said:

99 - 187 from the date that article was written.  .346 baseball turned Bucks overall winning percentage with the Orioles from .534 to .494.  I still have my Buckle Up towel and will remember those days fondly but I’ve turned the page.  Looks like ownership is doing the right things to turn the page as well.

It was good until it was bad. He did the most he could without the real stars. Davis not being a star did his deal in as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If Elias could somehow magically combine Stowers and Kjerstad into one player, then the O's would really have something.  I think Kjerstad has a special bat, but his defense anywhere leaves a lot to be desired.  I don't know if Stowers can keep his Ks low enough to be an everyday player, but the O's should find out before Santander hits free agency.
    • Read the ninth post on page one I wrote. That should have been the last post in this dumpster fire of a thread. Lol
    • What if he bats .100 for the next month?
    • I agree. And I think he has a higher upside than Kjerstad because he's actually a very good fielder. He's a guy that I think deserves regular playing time.
    • Back when we DFA'd Bauman, I said the right move would have been sending down Akin. He's just not very good. Sure he'll tease you with a month or two of good ball but he's very average. Cano is Cano. He had his 15 minutes of fame. He intimidates no one. And that's what you need from a high leverage guy. Vieira --- no need mincing words here --- he's not just a project, he stinks. Everyone has tried to fix his command issue and everyone has failed.  On the other hand, while he's no Bautista I don't mind rolling with Kimbrel this year. I like Coulombe. I think Perez, Webb and Tate are "ok".  The overall issue is that this bullpen isn't the bullpen a championship squad needs. Elias should have known that. Maybe he thought the offense and starting pitching would make up for our bullpen deficiencies. No team is perfect, I get that. I just don't know how a guy as bright as Elias thought this bullpen would be good enough coming out of Spring Training. Let's hope he makes some moves to get us a couple quality relievers.
    • From my understanding of the data the impetus for pulling pitchers early is not (usually) due to pitcher fatigue or pitcher injury risk, but rather because they're not as good the 3rd/4th time thru the lineup.  But I think I'd rather have our starters go from good to mediocre the 3rd time thru the lineup, versus trusting the crappy members of our bullpen with the ball.  Granted Akin had a bad game today and he had been pretty good, but we also tried to have Cionel get thru 2 innings and he gives up a leadoff triple.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...