Jump to content

Buck and Dan's home run strategy did not help the O's


wildcard

Recommended Posts

When ownership forces you to do your Free Agent shopping in March with monopoly money what exactly is the GM and Manager supposed to do? 

By that point you are basically having to select from a pool of undesirables -- the players who can't get on base.  With four homer happy ballparks in the AL-East going with the 1-dimensional slugger probably was our best hope for scoring any runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, notyourbuddy said:

When ownership forces you to do your Free Agent shopping in March with monopoly money what exactly is the GM and Manager supposed to do? 

By that point you are basically having to select from a pool of undesirables -- the players who can't get on base.  With four homer happy ballparks in the AL-East going with the 1-dimensional slugger probably was our best hope for scoring any runs.

I don't think they had monopoly money.

I don't think they spent what they had particularly wisely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

How in the world did Bud Norris keep his era under 4.00 in the AL East? It's a magic trick that stands toe to to with anything David Copperfield has done. 

The best thing for Bud Norris was  being demoted to the bullpen and then being released a bit later. After spending a few years in various teams' bullpens  he became the St Louis Cardinals closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nevermore said:

The best thing for Bud Norris was  being demoted to the bullpen and then being released a bit later. After spending a few years in various teams' bullpens  he became the St Louis Cardinals closer.

...and clubhouse cancer if you buy into the Matheny-related reports. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think they had monopoly money.

I don't think they spent what they had particularly wisely.

They most certainly did not. Again, you don't sign someone just for the sake of signing him. Especially someone as terrible as Cashner. The only thing worse would have been inking Vargas to a multi-year deal. They should have done their homework and directed that money at the Tyson Ross types that were available. Mikolas would have been a great signing too, in hindsight. The Cardinals clearly did their homework on him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Part of a product of having guys with strike zone judgement who don't bite on low and outside sliders.

Stanton struck out 211 times, Judge 152 after missing a lot of time and 208 last year, but whatevs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Morgan423 said:

Being mid-range in the league in runs scored works just fine when you have a decent starting rotation and an elite bullpen to keep opposing runs off the board.

Got a lot uglier once we stopped having those things.

Don't forget declining defense and guys playing out of position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

Many times over their tenure with the O's Dan and Buck expressed the strategy that building their offense around home runs was the right way to win with a home park of Camden Yards.  Looking back that startegy  seems to not have worked for them the way they planned.

2012,   2nd in homers in the AL but  9th in runs

2013,  1st in homers, 4th in runs

2014,  1st in homers, 6th in runs

2015, 3rd in homers, 7th in runs

2016,  1st in homers, 7th in runs

2017,  5th in homers,  8th in runs

2018, 9th in homers,  15th in runs

There are 5 playoff teams in the AL every year.  So the O's should plan to be at least 5th or better in runs.   That happened once  in the 7 years that Buck and Dan were together with the O's.   Maybe going forward the offensive strategy should be different.

But that's the way of the AL. Home runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Let  Westy  play 3B vs right handed pitching and LF vs left-handed pitching.    Urias can play 3B vs lefties.   This is only needed if Cowser can't hit lefties. Mateo and Westy can be platoon in the outfield IMO.
    • O'Neil seems like a perfect fit if he doesn't cost too much in years or dollars.   
    • I don’t think we choked. Stubborn as hell. We literally went down with the same sinking ship philosophy that we had the entire 2nd half of the season.  The young guys just have to adjust. I mean getting completely shut down for 5 post season games has to wear on them. If it doesn’t, then we were never built to win. 
    • Right now the 2025 OF has three LHH OF in Cowser, Mullins, and Kjerstad. I’m not sure what the bench makeup of this team will be, but it looks like we’ll need 1-2 RHH options.  We could bring Slater back on a small “Tony Kemp” like 1 year deal or a milb deal.  With Santander leaving, and Mateo back to being in the CF mix once healthy, do we go with a more COF RHH type? Trades are a possibility as well, but here is a list of upcoming RHH OF Free Agents,    
    • I actually didn't suggest a reliever as the return, that was SG. I was thinking more about trading veterans to acquire pitching prospects, probably lower level lottery tickets. I'd rather pick up ML roster pieces through free agency (assuming of course that Rubenstein will allow a significant payroll boost.).
    • Each player is different. Each player may have a somewhat different hitting philosophy, based on their strengths and weaknesses. Not everyone is a “power hitter.” I would not coach a Tony Santander the same as a Jordan Westburg, or a Jorge Mateo, or a Cedric Mullins. Some should be more selective, while others may need to do more damage and it’s ok for them to K more because the power payoff is worth it. Some should have a more oppo approach, while others may need to try to pull the ball more. The Waltimore certainly has messed with many of our RH bats.  Being a hitting coach is a lot of work, and it is usually not often a position held for many years. They seem to often be a scapegoat when the players do not hit. I wonder what drove the players to swing more at pitches they probably should not have. I seriously doubt it was Ryan Fuller. Hitting coaches have a general philosophical approach, like Fuller would have hitters learn to take pitches they cannot hit well, with less than 2 strikes.. He wanted them to swing only at pitches they can do damage with. They do not dramatically change. For the Orioles to become much more free swinging, that must have driven Fuller to leave. So be it. Going forward, they probably need to be somewhere in between the previous two years. In the playoffs, they get pitched to differently. It’s higher intensity. You have to be proficient in putting the ball in play. You have to be able to take what the game gives you, and execute. There is no excuse for repeatedly having runners in scoring position with less than two outs and repeatedly not being able to get them home. Bases loaded, no outs, hitters 2,3 and 4 coming up…we have to score there. The approach was to hit a grand slam. Awful baseball. A ton of talent on this roster, and something has to change. 
    • I have been pretty happy with Kjerstad's defense in the outfield corners.   Not that I want him in left at home.     I agree with what Elias said about Mayo's body type being more suited for 1B.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...