Jump to content

Fangraphs’ team positional rankings


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Best bet is a bullpen arm.

Remember every team gets an all star, even if it's a pity selection.

Right, maybe Givens will have a solid first half.  Even if it is a pitty selection you hate to see undeserving players making it in due to a rule like that.  Remember a couple years ago when we were complaining about Baltimore not hosting an All Star game? Could you imagine if Camden Yards was the home of the 2019 MLB All Star Game? YIKES

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RVAOsFan said:

Right, maybe Givens will have a solid first half.  Even if it is a pitty selection you hate to see undeserving players making it in due to a rule like that.  Remember a couple years ago when we were complaining about Baltimore not hosting an All Star game? Could you imagine if Camden Yards was the home of the 2019 MLB All Star Game? YIKES

Flat Breezy was a pity selection and he was the hero of his game.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something doesn't make sense with this.  In the Fangraphs writeup they say Villar is an average Major League player.  Are they really telling us that 29 major league teams are above-average (compared to all other players at all positions) at second base?  That seems unlikely, but that's kind of what their projections say.   Their Villar numbers have him regressing on the basis of his poor 2017.

In 2018 there were 41 players who played at least 50 games at second base.  19 of them were above average, Brock Holt was average.  The other 21 were below average.  Villar was 17th of the 41.  

What this also points out is that there's little or no substantive difference between the bottom 15 or 18 teams on the list at 2B.  They're all something like average.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Something doesn't make sense with this.  In the Fangraphs writeup they say Villar is an average Major League player.  Are they really telling us that 29 major league teams are above-average (compared to all other players at all positions) at second base?  That seems unlikely, but that's kind of what their projections say.   Their Villar numbers have him regressing on the basis of his poor 2017.

In 2018 there were 41 players who played at least 50 games at second base.  19 of them were above average, Brock Holt was average.  The other 21 were below average.  Villar was 17th of the 41.  

What this also points out is that there's little or no substantive difference between the bottom 15 or 18 teams on the list at 2B.  They're all something like average.

How exciting a narrative is it to have the O's rank last at every position?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Something doesn't make sense with this.  In the Fangraphs writeup they say Villar is an average Major League player.  Are they really telling us that 29 major league teams are above-average (compared to all other players at all positions) at second base?  That seems unlikely, but that's kind of what their projections say.   Their Villar numbers have him regressing on the basis of his poor 2017.

In 2018 there were 41 players who played at least 50 games at second base.  19 of them were above average, Brock Holt was average.  The other 21 were below average.  Villar was 17th of the 41.  

What this also points out is that there's little or no substantive difference between the bottom 15 or 18 teams on the list at 2B.  They're all something like average.

Agreed.  Villar certainly isn't a superstar, but I guess I figured he'd be someone in the middle of the pack of MLB 2nd baseman.  Maybe in the upper end of the lower half.  I dunno, I guess we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Something doesn't make sense with this.  In the Fangraphs writeup they say Villar is an average Major League player.  Are they really telling us that 29 major league teams are above-average (compared to all other players at all positions) at second base?  That seems unlikely, but that's kind of what their projections say.   Their Villar numbers have him regressing on the basis of his poor 2017.

In 2018 there were 41 players who played at least 50 games at second base.  19 of them were above average, Brock Holt was average.  The other 21 were below average.  Villar was 17th of the 41.  

What this also points out is that there's little or no substantive difference between the bottom 15 or 18 teams on the list at 2B.  They're all something like average.

They only have Villar for 371 PA's and 0.9 fWAR at 2B so he's only about half the 30th place projection with a bunch of replacement or sub-replacement backups, and prorates to about 1.5 in 650 PA's somewhere.  I'm guessing he'll get about 200 PA's of our coming 30th place SS projection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's not just that. But it's all of it (I would argue). It's the message that the org has made to the fans/potential paying customers through their actions, that we are not willing to do what it takes to be excellent. Yes we will give you a good team but we are not ever going to be committed to becoming great. That goes into the crappy ball park, the refusal to add meaningful payroll no matter what, the dogmatic adherence to "budget ball", etc. Who's the face of the Rays? They had Longoria for a long time, but everyone else they got rid of when the time came to trade them or keep them. (Except Franco and who knows what will happen there?) Every time that they have had a team in serious WS discission/contention, they never make meaningful adds to that team to try to win it all. What big FA have they ever signed? IMO all those things matter as the message you send to the potential customer/fan.
    • I didn't know this, I suspect a lot of people who aren't fans of the Padres didn't know this.
    • Stuff+ doesn't look at if a ball is a strike or not. What good is having incredible Stuff+ numbers if you have a WHIP of 1.500. I'm sure Fujinami has great Stuff+ numbers but we all know he can't pitch. I have no idea what PitchingBot is, but Kopech's FIP is 5.67. His xERA is 4.26 and the statcast models do not LOVE Kopech. His Pitching Run Value is negative for every pitch he throws. He's well below average in every area except for xBA, Fastball Velocity, Whiff%, K% and Extension. Every other model is below average to poor. He's prone to giving up HRs as well.
    • I don’t agree at all.  Everyone knows Boras’ reputation for playing hardball with teams and often taking players to free agency.  If you hire him, you do it because that’s the kind of agent you want.  The players’ aren’t innocents being led down the wrong path by Boras.  They’re going down the path they choose.   
    • Oh, please!   There you go again.
    • Sure.  I agree to an extent.   Elias obviously enjoys having depth, both for the ML team and for trading pieces.  It’s just my opinion that there are certain guys he’s unwilling to include.   He should be able to get upgrades even without those three on the table.   Hypothetically, if Elias offered Kjerstad + for Crochet and the WS insisted on Basallo or Mayo, I believe Elias would move to plan B.   He’s willing to give up something for short term gains but he’s going to draw the line somewhere.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...