Jump to content

Blake Swihart an option?


jamalshw

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

I'd pass.  He hasn't had a good offensive season since 2014 in AA.  From what I have read he is not a good defensive catcher.  I don't see the upside.   Elias likes to see guys develop in the minors.   He was never good at AAA and he is 27.   

I don’t get the love for the guy. If Swihart wasn’t with the Red Sox would be ever have been considered a top prospect?

27 years old and hasn’t put up stats at any level in 5 years. The Orioles can do better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

People were making jokes about Swihart being an Oriole (on Twitter) as soon as he was dropped. And I agree with the poster who said Swihart won't clear waivers. 

The Marlin's have also promised some "big" moves today which leads me to think they might DFA Wei Yin Chen. If they do I'm thinking that might set a precedent for the O's eating Davis' contract when he inevitably slumps again. Chen's adjusted salary through 2021 is $58M versus Davis who's adjusted salary through 2022 is roughly $84M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

People were making jokes about Swihart being an Oriole (on Twitter) as soon as he was dropped. And I agree with the poster who said Swihart won't clear waivers. 

The Marlin's have also promised some "big" moves today which leads me to think they might DFA Wei Yin Chen. If they do I'm thinking that might set a precedent for the O's eating Davis' contract when he inevitably slumps again. Chen's adjusted salary through 2021 is $58M versus Davis who's adjusted salary through 2022 is roughly $84M.

Hmm would the Orioles claim Chen to help  the starting rotation to eat innings this year. ?

Chen might be damaged goods at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

Are you sure? I thought the waiver position was determined by last season’s record throughout the year. Does it reset on a game by game basis?

I was corrected about part of it. Until April 30th, the order is based on last season. After April 30th, it is based on current season. So it can change game by game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Hmm would the Orioles claim Chen to help  the starting rotation to eat innings this year. ?

Chen might be damaged goods at this point. 

Not sure, but I'm not it's so much that he's damaged goods it's that the Marlins seem to be really committed to letting their young SPs play and there doesn't appear to be room for him. They might not all work out, but they have a stable of some very good young arms with upside. Trevor Richards, Caleb Joseph, Pablo Lopez, Sandy Alcantara, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Not sure, but I'm not it's so much that he's damaged goods it's that the Marlins seem to be really committed to letting their young SPs play and there doesn't appear to be room for him. They might not all work out, but they have a stable of some very good young arms with upside. Trevor Richards, Caleb Joseph, Pablo Lopez, Sandy Alcantara, etc.

Is there another Caleb Joseph or is that a typo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jrobb21613 said:

No thanks. I’m happy with the job Sucre and Severino are doing.

Sucre is nearly a 4A player and perhaps a back up because he has no bat. Severino was a nice grab due to availability but should not block this move. I would look to trade the AAA backup (I can remember his name Perez?)

 

*****it wouldn’t surprise me if f they work out a trade for him with somebody***

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I don’t get the love for the guy. If Swihart wasn’t with the Red Sox would be ever have been considered a top prospect?

27 years old and hasn’t put up stats at any level in 5 years. The Orioles can do better. 

His MLB career OPS of .679 would be like 5th best on our team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

His MLB career OPS of .679 would be like 5th best on our team. 

Which is mostly bolstered by Swihart's first two seasons with the Red Sox. His OPS since 2017 is .624.  I would rather ride with the current guys on the 40 man roster.

Year Tm G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS OPS+ TB GDP HBP SH SF IBB
2017-2019 BOS 100 243 223 33 51 11 0 4 22 6 1 19 67 .229 .292 .332 .624 69 74 4 1 0 0 0

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because we can doesn’t mean we should.You should never get something that merely duplicates what you already have. And Swihart Apparently isn’t even as good as what we already have. Plus, adding him would require dumping somebody from the roster, and we’ve already done that. MoveOn folks, nothing to see here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Which is mostly bolstered by Swihart's first two seasons with the Red Sox. His OPS since 2017 is .624.  I would rather ride with the current guys on the 40 man roster.

 
Year Tm G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS OPS+ TB GDP HBP SH SF IBB
2017-2019 BOS 100 243 223 33 51 11 0 4 22 6 1 19 67 .229 .292 .332 .624 69 74 4 1 0 0 0

 

You dismiss his first two season but dont mention his injury in 2017.  Seems like selective bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

Just because we can doesn’t mean we should.You should never get something that merely duplicates what you already have. And Swihart Apparently isn’t even as good as what we already have. Plus, adding him would require dumping somebody from the roster, and we’ve already done that. MoveOn folks, nothing to see here.

I’m not sure he’s duplicative. We have two glove first catchers with limited upside now. Swihart is a former top prospect who switch hits, was projected as a plus bat with adequate or average defensive skills. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

I’m not sure he’s duplicative. We have two glove first catchers with limited upside now. Swihart is a former top prospect who switch hits, was projected as a plus bat with adequate or average defensive skills. 

So was Andrew Susac. How well did that go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think Norby is going to be a very good MLB offensive player. I’m ok trading him but not for 1/2 season rental types.
    • Yeah I think they need to staggar the lefties in the rotation order. R-R-L-R-L like that.
    • Trading Mayo Kjerstad and Povich for one guy to become a relief pitcher is nuts.
    • We don't need starting pitchers. We need Relief Pitchers. We don't need average Relief Pitchers, we need consistent high leverage/high K Relief Pitchers.
    • If you feel comfortable putting Aiken and Baker (or even Tate) in during an elimination series, that's your prerogative. But I do not. Too inconsistent, which is the same reason why Mike Baumann pitched himself off the active roster. when spot was needed for returning starters off the IL. Currently Coulombe is on IL so we can't even count on one of our best. Cano has regressed from last season. We've also witnessed last season how Webb broke down from over use and was ineffective in the playoff series against Texas. Perez goes in streaks of either really good or concernedly bad (he loses his command). Akin's problem is he leaves the ball over the heart of the plate and he doesn't have good enough stuff to get away with it. They're meatballs. We might get some good times from Baker now that he's up, but I would only expect a month or 2 at best from him before he returns to old habits. And Suarez is a starter who wants to be a starter. Who knows if he will go back to the bullpen? He'll have to go deeper into games if he wants to stay in the rotation, otherwise, I think he should be in the bullpen. But that's not what he is right now in this moment. He's a starter with a ERA in the 1s.
    • It's pretty hard to say definitively that the bolded is true.  It might be, but there's also the loss in ability you have to account for.  30 year olds are slower than 26 year olds too.  Maybe their game knowledge and practice have made it so they can overcome the meager loss in bat speed/athleticism over that time span.  But the picture is a bit muddy.   I also don't think the aging issue is limited to people in their mid-late 30s.  Bat speed peaks at like 24 or 25 based on the data we have right now on it, and after 31 starts falling off fairly fast.  Obviously this is population data and individuals are likely to see different curves.   But outside of the stars that have a lot of ability to lose, it's becoming pretty clear that once you hit your early 30s it's pretty hard to maintain your skills without all the "help" that is extensively tested for.   I think that even for early-30s players teams are much more willing to drop them over giving them expensive market-rate deals, especially since they can abuse young talent so readily.
    • After a really dumb day at work, this was an absolutely delightful read. Seeing a diamond expert and a can of corn detonate a yoked PBA pro was absolutely wonderful. I love this website. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...